LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review.

van den Akker, Amber / Fabbri, Alice / Alardah, Dima I / Gilmore, Anna B / Rutter, Harry

Health research policy and systems

2023  Volume 21, Issue 1, Page(s) 69

Abstract: Context: Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors.: Objectives: To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems ... ...

Abstract Context: Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors.
Objectives: To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases.
Design: Scoping review.
Eligibility criteria: Peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2022.
Study selection: Studies that focused on NCDs and/or related risk factors, and included participants at any stage of their system's mapping process, were included.
Categories for analysis: The main categories for analysis were: (1) problem definition and goal-setting, (2) participant involvement, (3) structure of the mapping process, (4) validation of the systems map, and (5) evaluation of the mapping process.
Results: We identified 57 studies that used participatory systems mapping for a variety of purposes, including to inform or evaluate policies or interventions and to identify potential leverage points within a system. The number of participants ranged from 6 to 590. While policymakers and professionals were the stakeholder groups most often included, some studies described significant added value from including marginalized communities. There was a general lack of formal evaluation in most studies. However, reported benefits related mostly to individual and group learning, whereas limitations described included a lack of concrete actions following from systems mapping exercises.
Conclusions: Based on the findings of this review, we argue that research using participatory systems mapping would benefit from considering three different but intertwined actions: explicitly considering how different participants and the power imbalances between them may influence the participatory process, considering how the results from a systems mapping exercise may effectively inform policy or translate into action, and including and reporting on evaluation and outcomes of the process, wherever possible.
MeSH term(s) Humans ; Noncommunicable Diseases ; Risk Factors ; Exercise ; Policy
Language English
Publishing date 2023-07-06
Publishing country England
Document type Journal Article ; Review
ZDB-ID 2101196-5
ISSN 1478-4505 ; 1478-4505
ISSN (online) 1478-4505
ISSN 1478-4505
DOI 10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top