LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Reply to the editor: Potential contributors to implant losses following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

    Alberga, Jamie M / Vissink, Arjan / Korfage, Anke / de Visscher, Sebastiaan A H J / Witjes, Max J H / Langendijk, Johannes A / Raghoebar, Gerry M

    Oral diseases

    2024  

    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-20
    Publishing country Denmark
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 1290529-x
    ISSN 1601-0825 ; 1354-523X
    ISSN (online) 1601-0825
    ISSN 1354-523X
    DOI 10.1111/odi.14888
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Site-specific radiation dosage and implant survival in oral cancer patients: A cohort study.

    Alberga, Jamie M / Vissink, Arjan / Korfage, Anke / de Visscher, Sebastiaan A H J / Witjes, Max J H / Langendijk, Johannes A / Raghoebar, Gerry M

    Oral diseases

    2023  

    Abstract: Objectives: We assessed the radiation dosages (D: Materials and methods: Data was collected prospectively from 28 patients treated surgically for an intraoral malignancy, followed by postoperative radiotherapy (VMAT) and analyzed retrospectively. ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: We assessed the radiation dosages (D
    Materials and methods: Data was collected prospectively from 28 patients treated surgically for an intraoral malignancy, followed by postoperative radiotherapy (VMAT) and analyzed retrospectively. Patients received 2 implants in the native mandible during ablative surgery. Implant-specific D
    Results: Five out of 56 placed implants were lost during follow-up (median 36.0 months, IQR 39.0). Radiographically, peri-implant bone loss occurred in implants with a D
    Conclusion: An implant-specific D
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-11-20
    Publishing country Denmark
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1290529-x
    ISSN 1601-0825 ; 1354-523X
    ISSN (online) 1601-0825
    ISSN 1354-523X
    DOI 10.1111/odi.14813
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Mandibular dental implant placement immediately after teeth removal in head and neck cancer patients.

    Alberga, Jamie M / Korfage, Anke / Bonnema, Ilse / Witjes, Max J H / Vissink, Arjan / Raghoebar, Gerry M

    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer

    2020  Volume 28, Issue 12, Page(s) 5911–5918

    Abstract: Background: Little is known about immediate implant placement in head and neck cancer patients. We studied implant survival and functional outcomes of overdentures fabricated on implants placed immediately after removal of the lower dentition during ... ...

    Abstract Background: Little is known about immediate implant placement in head and neck cancer patients. We studied implant survival and functional outcomes of overdentures fabricated on implants placed immediately after removal of the lower dentition during ablative surgery or preceding primary radiotherapy (RT).
    Methods: Inclusion criteria were primary head and neck cancer, dentate lower jaw, and indication for removal of remaining teeth. Two implants to support a mandibular overdenture were placed immediately after extraction of the dentition during ablative surgery, or prior to starting primary radiotherapy. Standardized questionnaires and clinical assessments were conducted (median follow-up 18.5 months, IQR 13.3).
    Results: Fifty-eight implants were placed in 29 patients. Four implants were lost (implant survival rate 93.1%). In 9 patients, no functional overdenture could be made. All patients were satisfied with their dentures.
    Conclusions: Combining dental implant placement with removal of remaining teeth preceding head neck oncology treatment results in a favorable treatment outcome.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Dental Implantation/methods ; Dental Implants ; Dental Restoration Failure/statistics & numerical data ; Denture, Overlay ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy ; Humans ; Jaw, Edentulous/surgery ; Male ; Mandible/surgery ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life/psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tooth Extraction ; Treatment Outcome
    Chemical Substances Dental Implants
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-11
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1134446-5
    ISSN 1433-7339 ; 0941-4355
    ISSN (online) 1433-7339
    ISSN 0941-4355
    DOI 10.1007/s00520-020-05431-y
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review.

    Alberga, Jamie M / Vosselman, Nathalie / Korfage, Anke / Delli, Konstantina / Witjes, Max J H / Raghoebar, Gerry M / Vissink, Arjan

    Oral diseases

    2020  Volume 27, Issue 1, Page(s) 94–110

    Abstract: Background: Oral cancer patients can benefit from dental implant placement. Traditionally, implants are placed after completing oncologic treatment (secondary implant placement). Implant placement during ablative surgery (primary placement) in oral ... ...

    Abstract Background: Oral cancer patients can benefit from dental implant placement. Traditionally, implants are placed after completing oncologic treatment (secondary implant placement). Implant placement during ablative surgery (primary placement) in oral cancer patients seems beneficial in terms of early start of oral rehabilitation and limiting additional surgical interventions. Guidelines on the ideal timing of implant placement in oral cancer patients are missing.
    Objective: To perform a scoping literature review on studies examining the timing of dental implant placement in oral cancer patients and propose a clinical practice recommendations guideline.
    Methods: A literature search for studies dealing with primary and/or secondary implant placement in MEDLINE was conducted (last search December 27, 2019). The primary outcome was 5-year implant survival.
    Results: Sixteen out of 808 studies were considered eligible. Both primary and secondary implant placement showed acceptable overall implant survival ratios with a higher pooled 5-year implant survival rate for primary implant placement 92.8% (95% CI: 87.1%-98.5%) than secondary placed implants (86.4%, 95% CI: 77.0%-95.8%). Primary implant placement is accompanied by earlier prosthetic rehabilitation after tumor surgery.
    Conclusion: Patients with oral cancer greatly benefit from, preferably primary placed, dental implants in their prosthetic rehabilitation. The combination of tumor surgery with implant placement in native mandibular bone should be provided as standard care.
    MeSH term(s) Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Dental Implants ; Humans ; Mandible ; Mouth Neoplasms/surgery
    Chemical Substances Dental Implants
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-03-19
    Publishing country Denmark
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1290529-x
    ISSN 1601-0825 ; 1354-523X
    ISSN (online) 1601-0825
    ISSN 1354-523X
    DOI 10.1111/odi.13312
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top