LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy as revisional bariatric procedures after adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective cohort study.

    Santos-Sousa, Hugo / Nogueiro, Jorge / Lindeza, Luis / Carmona, Maria Neves / Amorim-Cruz, Filipe / Resende, Fernando / Costa-Pinho, André / Preto, John / Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo / Carneiro, Silvestre / Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo

    Langenbeck's archives of surgery

    2023  Volume 408, Issue 1, Page(s) 441

    Abstract: Introduction: The frequency of revisional bariatric surgery is increasing, but its effectiveness and safety are not yet fully established. The aim of our study was to compare short-term outcomes of primary (pRYGB and pSG) and revisional bariatric ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: The frequency of revisional bariatric surgery is increasing, but its effectiveness and safety are not yet fully established. The aim of our study was to compare short-term outcomes of primary (pRYGB and pSG) and revisional bariatric surgeries (rRYGB and rSG).
    Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study assessing all patients submitted to primary and revisional (after a failed AGB) RYGB and SG in 2019. Each patient was followed-up at 6 months and 12 months after surgery. We compared pRYGB vs. rRYGB, pSG vs. rSG and rRYGB vs. rSG on weight loss, surgical complications, and resolution of comorbidities.
    Results: We assessed 494 patients, of which 18.8% had undergone a revisional procedure. Higher weight loss at 6 and 12 months was observed in patients undergoing primary vs. revisional procedures. Patients submitted to rRYGB lost more weight than those with rSG (%EWL 12 months = 82.6% vs. 69.0%, p < 0.001). Regarding the resolution of obesity-related comorbidities, diabetes resolution was more frequent in pRYGB than rRYGB (54.2% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.038). Also, 41.7% of the patients who underwent rRYGB had dyslipidemia resolution vs. 0% from the rSG group (p = 0.035). Dyslipidemia resolution was also more common in pSG vs. rSG (68.6% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.001). No significant differences in surgical complications were found.
    Conclusion: Revisional bariatric surgery is effective and safe treating obesity and related comorbidities after AGB. Primary procedures appear to be associated with better weight loss outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to better understand the role of revisional bariatric surgery.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Bariatric Surgery ; Bariatrics ; Dyslipidemias ; Gastrectomy ; Gastric Bypass ; Gastroplasty ; Obesity/surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Weight Loss
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-11-21
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1423681-3
    ISSN 1435-2451 ; 1435-2443
    ISSN (online) 1435-2451
    ISSN 1435-2443
    DOI 10.1007/s00423-023-03174-y
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Risk and Prophylactic Management of Gallstone Disease in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and A Bayesian meta-analysis.

    Amorim-Cruz, Filipe / Santos-Sousa, Hugo / Ribeiro, Miguel / Nogueiro, Jorge / Pereira, André / Resende, Fernando / Costa-Pinho, André / Preto, John / Lima-da-Costa, Eduardo / Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo

    Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

    2023  Volume 27, Issue 2, Page(s) 433–448

    Abstract: Background: The frequency and management of gallstone disease (GD) in bariatric patients, including the role of routine prophylactic concomitant cholecystectomy (CCY), are still a matter of debate. This study aims to assess the risk of de novo GD in ... ...

    Abstract Background: The frequency and management of gallstone disease (GD) in bariatric patients, including the role of routine prophylactic concomitant cholecystectomy (CCY), are still a matter of debate. This study aims to assess the risk of de novo GD in patients undergoing bariatric surgery (BS) and their predictive factors, as well as mortality and morbidity in prophylactic CCY compared to BS alone.
    Methods: We performed a systematic review, searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science until April 2021. We performed a Bayesian meta-analysis to estimate the risk of GD development after BS and the morbidity and mortality associated with BS alone versus BS + prophylactic CCY. Sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis.
    Results: The risk of de novo post bariatric GD was 20.7% (95% credible interval [95% CrI] = 13.0-29.7%; I
    Conclusion: The risk of de novo symptomatic GD after BS is not substantially high. Although mortality is similar between groups, odds of major postoperative complications were higher in patients submitted to BS + prophylactic CCY. It is still arguable if prophylactic CCY is a fitting approach for patients with a preoperative lithiasic gallbladder.
    MeSH term(s) Female ; Humans ; Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects ; Bayes Theorem ; Cholecystectomy/adverse effects ; Cholelithiasis/surgery ; Obesity, Morbid/surgery ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-01-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2012365-6
    ISSN 1873-4626 ; 1934-3213 ; 1091-255X
    ISSN (online) 1873-4626 ; 1934-3213
    ISSN 1091-255X
    DOI 10.1007/s11605-022-05567-8
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top