LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 10

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Antiviral metabolite 3'-deoxy-3',4'-didehydro-cytidine is detectable in serum and identifies acute viral infections including COVID-19.

    Mehta, Ravi / Chekmeneva, Elena / Jackson, Heather / Sands, Caroline / Mills, Ewurabena / Arancon, Dominique / Li, Ho Kwong / Arkell, Paul / Rawson, Timothy M / Hammond, Robert / Amran, Maisarah / Haber, Anna / Cooke, Graham S / Noursadeghi, Mahdad / Kaforou, Myrsini / Lewis, Matthew R / Takats, Zoltan / Sriskandan, Shiranee

    Med (New York, N.Y.)

    2022  Volume 3, Issue 3, Page(s) 204–215.e6

    Abstract: Background: There is a critical need for rapid viral infection diagnostics to enable prompt case identification in pandemic settings and support targeted antimicrobial prescribing.: Methods: Using untargeted high-resolution liquid chromatography ... ...

    Abstract Background: There is a critical need for rapid viral infection diagnostics to enable prompt case identification in pandemic settings and support targeted antimicrobial prescribing.
    Methods: Using untargeted high-resolution liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, we compared the admission serum metabolome of emergency department patients with viral infections (including COVID-19), bacterial infections, inflammatory conditions, and healthy controls. Sera from an independent cohort of emergency department patients admitted with viral or bacterial infections underwent profiling to validate findings. Associations between whole-blood gene expression and the identified metabolite of interest were examined.
    Findings: 3'-Deoxy-3',4'-didehydro-cytidine (ddhC), a free base of the only known human antiviral small molecule ddhC-triphosphate (ddhCTP), was detected for the first time in serum. When comparing 60 viral with 101 non-viral cases in the discovery cohort, ddhC was the most significantly differentially abundant metabolite, generating an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.954 (95% CI: 0.923-0.986). In the validation cohort, ddhC was again the most significantly differentially abundant metabolite when comparing 40 viral with 40 bacterial cases, generating an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.708-0.915). Transcripts of viperin and
    Conclusions: The antiviral precursor molecule ddhC is detectable in serum and an accurate marker for acute viral infection. Interferon-inducible genes viperin and
    Funding: NIHR Imperial BRC; UKRI.
    MeSH term(s) Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use ; Bacterial Infections ; COVID-19/diagnosis ; Cytidine ; Humans ; Virus Diseases
    Chemical Substances Antiviral Agents ; Cytidine (5CSZ8459RP)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-31
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ISSN 2666-6340
    ISSN (online) 2666-6340
    DOI 10.1016/j.medj.2022.01.009
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Differentiation of COVID-19 from other emergency infectious disease presentations using whole blood transcriptomics then rapid qPCR: a case-control and observational cohort study

    Li, Ho Kwong / Jackson, Heather R. / Miglietta, Luca / Habgood-Coote, Dominic / Mills, Ewurabena / Mehta, Ravi / Hamady, Ali / Haber, Anna / Amran, Maisarah / Hammond, Robert / Arancon, Dominique / Cooke, Graham S. / Noursadeghi, Mahdad / Openshaw, Peter J.M. / Rodriguez-Manzano, Jesus / Kaforou, Myrsini / Sriskandan, Shiranee

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background. The overlapping clinical presentations of patients with acute respiratory disease can complicate disease diagnosis. Whilst PCR diagnostic methods to identify SARS-CoV-2 are highly sensitive, they have their shortcomings including false- ... ...

    Abstract Background. The overlapping clinical presentations of patients with acute respiratory disease can complicate disease diagnosis. Whilst PCR diagnostic methods to identify SARS-CoV-2 are highly sensitive, they have their shortcomings including false-positive risk and slow turnaround times. Changes in host gene expression can be used to distinguish between disease groups of interest, providing a viable alternative to infectious disease diagnosis. Methods. We interrogated the whole blood gene expression profiles of patients with COVID-19 (n=87), bacterial infections (n=88), viral infections (n=36), and not-infected controls (n=27) to identify a sparse diagnostic signature for distinguishing COVID-19 from other clinically similar infectious and non-infectious conditions. The sparse diagnostic signature underwent validation in a new cohort using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and then underwent further external validation in an independent in silico RNA-seq cohort. Findings. We identified a 10-gene signature (OASL, UBP1, IL1RN, ZNF684, ENTPD7, NFKBIE, CDKN1C, CD44, OTOF, MSR1) that distinguished COVID-19 from other infectious and non-infectious diseases with an AUC of 87.1% (95% CI: 82.6%-91.7%) in the discovery cohort and 88.7% and 93.6% when evaluated in the RT-qPCR validation, and in silico cohorts respectively. Interpretation. Using well-phenotyped samples collected from patients admitted acutely with a spectrum of infectious and non-infectious syndromes, we provide a detailed catalogue of blood gene expression at the time of hospital admission. The findings result in the identification of a 10-gene host diagnostic signature to accurately distinguish COVID-19 from other infection syndromes presenting to hospital. This could be developed into a rapid point-of-care diagnostic test, providing a valuable syndromic diagnostic tool for future early pandemic use.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-05
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2023.09.03.23294989
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Differentiation of COVID-19 from other emergency infectious disease presentations using whole blood transcriptomics then rapid qPCR: a case-control and observational cohort study

    Li, Ho Kwong / Jackson, Heather R. / Miglietta, Luca / Habgood-Coote, Dominic / Mills, Ewurabena / Mehta, Ravi / Hamady, Ali / Haber, Anna / Amran, Maisarah / Hammond, Robert / Arancon, Dominique / Cooke, Graham S. / Noursadeghi, Mahdad / Openshaw, Peter JM / Rodriguez Manzano, Jesus / Kaforou, Myrsini / Sriskandan, Shiranee

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background. The overlapping clinical presentations of patients with acute respiratory disease can complicate disease diagnosis. Whilst PCR diagnostic methods to identify SARS-CoV-2 are highly sensitive, they have their shortcomings including false- ... ...

    Abstract Background. The overlapping clinical presentations of patients with acute respiratory disease can complicate disease diagnosis. Whilst PCR diagnostic methods to identify SARS-CoV-2 are highly sensitive, they have their shortcomings including false-positive risk and slow turnaround times. Changes in host gene expression can be used to distinguish between disease groups of interest, providing a viable alternative to infectious disease diagnosis. Methods. We interrogated the whole blood gene expression profiles of patients with COVID-19 (n=87), bacterial infections (n=88), viral infections (n=36), and not-infected controls (n=27) to identify a sparse diagnostic signature for distinguishing COVID-19 from other clinically similar infectious and non-infectious conditions. The sparse diagnostic signature underwent validation in a new cohort using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and then underwent further external validation in an independent in silico RNA-seq cohort. Findings. We identified a 10-gene signature (OASL, UBP1, IL1RN, ZNF684, ENTPD7, NFKBIE, CDKN1C, CD44, OTOF, MSR1) that distinguished COVID-19 from other infectious and non-infectious diseases with an AUC of 87.1% (95% CI: 82.6%-91.7%) in the discovery cohort and 88.7% and 93.6% when evaluated in the RT-qPCR validation, and in silico cohorts respectively. Interpretation. Using well-phenotyped samples collected from patients admitted acutely with a spectrum of infectious and non-infectious syndromes, we provide a detailed catalogue of blood gene expression at the time of hospital admission. The findings result in the identification of a 10-gene host diagnostic signature to accurately distinguish COVID-19 from other infection syndromes presenting to hospital. This could be developed into a rapid point-of-care diagnostic test, providing a valuable syndromic diagnostic tool for future early pandemic use.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-05
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2023.09.03.23294989
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Cost analysis of open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

    Bansal, Sukhchain S / Dogra, Tara / Smith, Peter W / Amran, Maisarah / Auluck, Ishna / Bhambra, Maninder / Sura, Manraj S / Rowe, Edward / Koupparis, Anthony

    BJU international

    2017  

    Abstract: Objectives: To perform a cost analysis comparing the cost of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with open RC (ORC) in a UK tertiary referral centre and to identify the key cost drivers.: Patients and methods: Data on hospital length of stay ( ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: To perform a cost analysis comparing the cost of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with open RC (ORC) in a UK tertiary referral centre and to identify the key cost drivers.
    Patients and methods: Data on hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time (OT), transfusion rate, and volume and complication rate were obtained from a prospectively updated institutional database for patients undergoing RARC or ORC. A cost decision tree model was created. Sensitivity analysis was performed to find key drivers of overall cost and to find breakeven points with ORC. Monte Carlo analysis was performed to quantify the variability in the dataset.
    Results: One RARC procedure costs £12 449.87, or £12 106.12 if the robot was donated via charitable funds. In comparison, one ORC procedure costs £10 474.54. RARC is 18.9% more expensive than ORC. The key cost drivers were OT, LOS, and the number of cases performed per annum.
    Conclusion: High ongoing equipment costs remain a large barrier to the cost of RARC falling. However, minimal improvements in patient quality of life would be required to offset this difference.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-10-06
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1462191-5
    ISSN 1464-410X ; 1464-4096 ; 1358-8672
    ISSN (online) 1464-410X
    ISSN 1464-4096 ; 1358-8672
    DOI 10.1111/bju.14044
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Antiviral metabolite 3'-Deoxy-3',4'-didehydro-cytidine is detectable in serum and identifies acute viral infections including COVID-19

    Mehta, Ravi / Chekmeneva, Elena / Jackson, Heather / Sands, Caroline / Mills, Ewurabena / Arancon, Dominique / Li, Ho Kwong / Arkell, Paul / Rawson, Timothy Miles / Hammond, Robert / Amran, Maisarah / Haber, Anna / Cooke, Graham / Noursadeghi, Mahdad / Kaforou, Myrsini / Lewis, Matthew / Takats, Zoltan / Sriskandan, Shiranee

    medRxiv

    Abstract: There is a critical need for improved infectious disease diagnostics to enable rapid case identification in a viral pandemic and support targeted antimicrobial prescribing. Here we use high-resolution liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry ... ...

    Abstract There is a critical need for improved infectious disease diagnostics to enable rapid case identification in a viral pandemic and support targeted antimicrobial prescribing. Here we use high-resolution liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to compare the admission serum metabolome of patients attending hospital with a range of viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2, to those with bacterial infections, non-infected inflammatory conditions and healthy controls. We demonstrate for the first time that 39-Deoxy-39,49-didehydro-cytidine (ddhC), a free base of the only known human antiviral small molecule ddhC-triphosphate (ddhCTP), is detectable in serum. ddhC acts as an accurate biomarker for viral infections, generating an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.954 (95% confidence interval 0.923-0.986) when comparing viral to non-viral cases. Gene expression of viperin, the enzyme responsible for ddhCTP synthesis, is highly correlated with ddhC, providing a biological mechanism for its increase during viral infection. These findings underline a key future diagnostic role of ddhC in the context of pandemic preparedness and antimicrobial stewardship.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-25
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2021.07.23.21260740
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study.

    Gibani, Malick M / Toumazou, Christofer / Sohbati, Mohammadreza / Sahoo, Rashmita / Karvela, Maria / Hon, Tsz-Kin / De Mateo, Sara / Burdett, Alison / Leung, K Y Felice / Barnett, Jake / Orbeladze, Arman / Luan, Song / Pournias, Stavros / Sun, Jiayang / Flower, Barney / Bedzo-Nutakor, Judith / Amran, Maisarah / Quinlan, Rachael / Skolimowska, Keira /
    Herrera, Carolina / Rowan, Aileen / Badhan, Anjna / Klaber, Robert / Davies, Gary / Muir, David / Randell, Paul / Crook, Derrick / Taylor, Graham P / Barclay, Wendy / Mughal, Nabeela / Moore, Luke S P / Jeffery, Katie / Cooke, Graham S

    The Lancet. Microbe

    2020  Volume 1, Issue 7, Page(s) e300–e307

    Abstract: Background: Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Laboratory RT-PCR testing is the current standard of care but usually requires a centralised laboratory and ... ...

    Abstract Background: Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Laboratory RT-PCR testing is the current standard of care but usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe our diagnostic accuracy assessment of a novel, rapid point-of-care real time RT-PCR CovidNudge test, which requires no laboratory handling or sample pre-processing.
    Methods: Between April and May, 2020, we obtained two nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals in three hospitals in London and Oxford (UK). Samples were collected from three groups: self-referred health-care workers with suspected COVID-19; patients attending emergency departments with suspected COVID-19; and hospital inpatient admissions with or without suspected COVID-19. For the CovidNudge test, nasopharyngeal swabs were inserted directly into a cartridge which contains all reagents and components required for RT-PCR reactions, including multiple technical replicates of seven SARS-CoV-2 gene targets (
    Findings: We obtained 386 paired samples: 280 (73%) from self-referred health-care workers, 15 (4%) from patients in the emergency department, and 91 (23%) hospital inpatient admissions. Of the 386 paired samples, 67 tested positive on the CovidNudge point-of-care platform and 71 with standard laboratory RT-PCR. The overall sensitivity of the point-of-care test compared with laboratory-based testing was 94% (95% CI 86-98) with an overall specificity of 100% (99-100). The sensitivity of the test varied by group (self-referred healthcare workers 94% [95% CI 85-98]; patients in the emergency department 100% [48-100]; and hospital inpatient admissions 100% [29-100]). Specificity was consistent between groups (self-referred health-care workers 100% [95% CI 98-100]; patients in the emergency department 100% [69-100]; and hospital inpatient admissions 100% [96-100]). Point of care testing performance was similar during a period of high background prevalence of laboratory positive tests (25% [95% 20-31] in April, 2020) and low prevalence (3% [95% 1-9] in inpatient screening). Amplification of viral nucleocapsid (n1, n2, and n3) and envelope protein gene (e-gene) were most sensitive for detection of spiked SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
    Interpretation: The CovidNudge platform was a sensitive, specific, and rapid point of care test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 without laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. The device, which has been implemented in UK hospitals since May, 2020, could enable rapid decisions for clinical care and testing programmes.
    Funding: National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Oxford University in partnership with Public Health England, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, and DnaNudge.
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/diagnosis ; Humans ; Point-of-Care Testing ; RNA, Viral/genetics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity
    Chemical Substances RNA, Viral
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-09-17
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ISSN 2666-5247
    ISSN (online) 2666-5247
    DOI 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30121-X
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: CovidNudge: diagnostic accuracy of a novel lab-free point-of-care diagnostic for SARS-CoV-2

    Gibani, Malick M / Toumazou, Christofer / Sohbati, Mohammadreza / Sahoo, Rashmita / Karvela, Maria / Hon, Tsz-Kin / Mateo, Sara De / Burdett, Alison / Leung, K Y Felice / Barnett, Jake / Orbeladze, Arman / Luan, Song / Pournias, Stavros / Sun, Jiayang / Flower, Barnaby / Bedzo-Nutakor, Judith / Amran, Maisarah / Quinlan, Rachael / Skolimowska, Keira /
    Klaber, Robert / Davies, Gary / Muir, David / Randell, Paul / Crook, Derrick W M / Taylor, Graham P / Barclay, Wendy / Mughal, Nabeela / Moore, Luke S P / Jeffery, Katie / Cooke, Graham S

    Abstract: Background Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of SARS-CoV-2. Reverse Transcriptase- Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) testing usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe the ... ...

    Abstract Background Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of SARS-CoV-2. Reverse Transcriptase- Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) testing usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe the development and diagnostic accuracy assessment of a novel, rapid point-of-care RT-PCR test, the DnaNudge platform CovidNudge test, which requires no laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. Methods Nasopharyngeal swabs are inserted directly into a cartridge which contains all reagents and components required for RT-PCR reactions, including multiple technical replicates of seven SARS-CoV-2 gene targets (rdrp1, rdrp2, e-gene, n-gene, n1, n2 and n3) and human ribonuclease P (RNaseP) as a positive control. Between April and May 2020, swab samples were tested in parallel using the CovidNudge direct-to-cartridge platform and standard laboratory RT-PCR using swabs in viral transport medium. Samples were collected from three groups: self-referred healthcare workers with suspected COVID-19 (Group 1, n=280/386; 73%); patients attending the emergency department with suspected COVID-19 (Group 2, n=15/386; 4%) and hospital inpatient admissions with or without suspected COVID-19 (Group 3, n=91/386; 23%). Results Of 386 paired samples tested across all groups, 67 tested positive on the CovidNudge platform and 71 with standard laboratory RT-PCR. The sensitivity of the test varied by group (Group 1 93% [84-98%], Group 2 100% [48-100%] and Group 3 100% [29-100%], giving an average sensitivity of 94.4% (95% confidence interval 86-98%) and an overall specificity of 100% (95%CI 99-100%; Group 1 100% [98-100%]; Group 2 100% [69-100%] and Group 3 100% [96-100%]). Point of care testing performance was comparable during a period of high (25%) and low (3%) background prevalence. Amplification of the viral nucleocapsid (n1, n2, n3) targets were most sensitive for detection of SARS-CoV2, with the assay able to detect 1x104 viral particles in a single swab. Conclusions The CovidNudge platform offers a sensitive, specific and rapid point of care test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 without laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. The implementation of such a device could be used to enable rapid decisions for clinical care and testing programs.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher MedRxiv; WHO
    Document type Article ; Online
    Note WHO #Covidence: #20174193
    DOI 10.1101/2020.08.13.20174193
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: CovidNudge: diagnostic accuracy of a novel lab-free point-of-care diagnostic for SARS-CoV-2

    Gibani, Malick M / Toumazou, Christofer / Sohbati, Mohammadreza / Sahoo, Rashmita / Karvela, Maria / Hon, Tsz-Kin / De Mateo, Sara / Burdett, Alison / Leung, K Y Felice / Barnett, Jake / Orbeladze, Arman / Luan, Song / Pournias, Stavros / Sun, Jiayang / Flower, Barnaby / Bedzo-Nutakor, Judith / Amran, Maisarah / Quinlan, Rachael / Skolimowska, Keira /
    Klaber, Robert / Davies, Gary / Muir, David / Randell, Paul / Crook, Derrick W M / Taylor, Graham P / Barclay, Wendy / Mughal, Nabeela / Moore, Luke S P / Jeffery, Katie / Cooke, Graham S

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of SARS-CoV-2. Reverse Transcriptase- Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) testing usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe the ... ...

    Abstract Background Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of SARS-CoV-2. Reverse Transcriptase- Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) testing usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe the development and diagnostic accuracy assessment of a novel, rapid point-of-care RT-PCR test, the DnaNudge platform CovidNudge test, which requires no laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. Methods Nasopharyngeal swabs are inserted directly into a cartridge which contains all reagents and components required for RT-PCR reactions, including multiple technical replicates of seven SARS-CoV-2 gene targets (rdrp1, rdrp2, e-gene, n-gene, n1, n2 and n3) and human ribonuclease P (RNaseP) as a positive control. Between April and May 2020, swab samples were tested in parallel using the CovidNudge direct-to-cartridge platform and standard laboratory RT-PCR using swabs in viral transport medium. Samples were collected from three groups: self-referred healthcare workers with suspected COVID-19 (Group 1, n=280/386; 73%); patients attending the emergency department with suspected COVID-19 (Group 2, n=15/386; 4%) and hospital inpatient admissions with or without suspected COVID-19 (Group 3, n=91/386; 23%). Results Of 386 paired samples tested across all groups, 67 tested positive on the CovidNudge platform and 71 with standard laboratory RT-PCR. The sensitivity of the test varied by group (Group 1 93% [84-98%], Group 2 100% [48-100%] and Group 3 100% [29-100%], giving an average sensitivity of 94.4% (95% confidence interval 86-98%) and an overall specificity of 100% (95%CI 99-100%; Group 1 100% [98-100%]; Group 2 100% [69-100%] and Group 3 100% [96-100%]). Point of care testing performance was comparable during a period of high (25%) and low (3%) background prevalence. Amplification of the viral nucleocapsid (n1, n2, n3) targets were most sensitive for detection of SARS-CoV2, with the assay able to detect 1x104 viral particles in a single swab. Conclusions The CovidNudge platform offers a sensitive, specific and rapid point of care test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 without laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. The implementation of such a device could be used to enable rapid decisions for clinical care and testing programs.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-15
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.08.13.20174193
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study

    Gibani, Malick M / Toumazou, Christofer / Sohbati, Mohammadreza / Sahoo, Rashmita / Karvela, Maria / Hon, Tsz-Kin / De Mateo, Sara / Burdett, Alison / Leung, K Y Felice / Barnett, Jake / Orbeladze, Arman / Luan, Song / Pournias, Stavros / Sun, Jiayang / Flower, Barney / Bedzo-Nutakor, Judith / Amran, Maisarah / Quinlan, Rachael / Skolimowska, Keira /
    Herrera, Carolina / Rowan, Aileen / Badhan, Anjna / Klaber, Robert / Davies, Gary / Muir, David / Randell, Paul / Crook, Derrick / Taylor, Graham P / Barclay, Wendy / Mughal, Nabeela / Moore, Luke S P / Jeffery, Katie / Cooke, Graham S

    Abstract: Background: Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Laboratory RT-PCR testing is the current standard of care but usually requires a centralised laboratory and ... ...

    Abstract Background: Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Laboratory RT-PCR testing is the current standard of care but usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe our diagnostic accuracy assessment of a novel, rapid point-of-care real time RT-PCR CovidNudge test, which requires no laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. Methods: Between April and May, 2020, we obtained two nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals in three hospitals in London and Oxford (UK). Samples were collected from three groups: self-referred health-care workers with suspected COVID-19; patients attending emergency departments with suspected COVID-19; and hospital inpatient admissions with or without suspected COVID-19. For the CovidNudge test, nasopharyngeal swabs were inserted directly into a cartridge which contains all reagents and components required for RT-PCR reactions, including multiple technical replicates of seven SARS-CoV-2 gene targets (rdrp1, rdrp2, e-gene, n-gene, n1, n2 and n3) and human ribonuclease P (RNaseP) as sample adequacy control. Swab samples were tested in parallel using the CovidNudge platform, and with standard laboratory RT-PCR using swabs in viral transport medium for processing in a central laboratory. The primary analysis was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the point-of-care CovidNudge test with laboratory-based testing. Findings: We obtained 386 paired samples: 280 (73%) from self-referred health-care workers, 15 (4%) from patients in the emergency department, and 91 (23%) hospital inpatient admissions. Of the 386 paired samples, 67 tested positive on the CovidNudge point-of-care platform and 71 with standard laboratory RT-PCR. The overall sensitivity of the point-of-care test compared with laboratory-based testing was 94% (95% CI 86-98) with an overall specificity of 100% (99-100). The sensitivity of the test varied by group (self-referred healthcare workers 93% [95% CI 84-98]; patients in the emergency department 100% [48-100]; and hospital inpatient admissions 100% [29-100]). Specificity was consistent between groups (self-referred health-care workers 100% [95% CI 98-100%]; patients in the emergency department 100% [69-100]; and hospital inpatient admissions 100% [96-100]). Point of care testing performance was similar during a period of high background prevalence of laboratory positive tests (25% [95% 20-31] in April, 2020) and low prevalence (3% [95% 1-9] in inpatient screening). Amplification of viral nucleocapsid (n1, n2, and n3) and envelope protein gene (e-gene) were most sensitive for detection of spiked SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Interpretation: The CovidNudge platform was a sensitive, specific, and rapid point of care test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 without laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. The device, which has been implemented in UK hospitals since May, 2020, could enable rapid decisions for clinical care and testing programmes. Funding: National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Oxford University in partnership with Public Health England, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, and DnaNudge.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #786465
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge)

    Gibani, Malick M / Toumazou, Christofer / Sohbati, Mohammadreza / Sahoo, Rashmita / Karvela, Maria / Hon, Tsz-Kin / De Mateo, Sara / Burdett, Alison / Leung, K Y Felice / Barnett, Jake / Orbeladze, Arman / Luan, Song / Pournias, Stavros / Sun, Jiayang / Flower, Barney / Bedzo-Nutakor, Judith / Amran, Maisarah / Quinlan, Rachael / Skolimowska, Keira /
    Herrera, Carolina / Rowan, Aileen / Badhan, Anjna / Klaber, Robert / Davies, Gary / Muir, David / Randell, Paul / Crook, Derrick / Taylor, Graham P / Barclay, Wendy / Mughal, Nabeela / Moore, Luke S P / Jeffery, Katie / Cooke, Graham S

    The Lancet Microbe

    a diagnostic accuracy study

    2020  Volume 1, Issue 7, Page(s) e300–e307

    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publisher Elsevier BV
    Publishing country us
    Document type Article ; Online
    ISSN 2666-5247
    DOI 10.1016/s2666-5247(20)30121-x
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top