LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Acceptability and usefulness of the EORTC 'Write In three Symptoms/Problems' (WISP): a brief open-ended instrument for symptom assessment in cancer patients.

    Rojas-Concha, Leslye / Arrarrás, Juan Ignacio / Conroy, Thierry / Chalk, Tara / Guberti, Monica / Holzner, Bernhard / Husson, Olga / Kuliś, Dagmara / Shamieh, Omar / Piccinin, Claire / Puga, María José / Rohde, Gudrun / Groenvold, Mogens

    Health and quality of life outcomes

    2024  Volume 22, Issue 1, Page(s) 28

    Abstract: Background: The use of open-ended questions supplementing static questionnaires with closed questions may facilitate the recognition of symptoms and toxicities. The open-ended 'Write In three Symptoms/Problems (WISP)' instrument permits patients to ... ...

    Abstract Background: The use of open-ended questions supplementing static questionnaires with closed questions may facilitate the recognition of symptoms and toxicities. The open-ended 'Write In three Symptoms/Problems (WISP)' instrument permits patients to report additional symptoms/problems not covered by selected EORTC questionnaires. We evaluated the acceptability and usefulness of WISP with cancer patients receiving active and palliative care/treatment in Austria, Chile, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom.
    Methods: We conducted a literature search on validated instruments for cancer patients including open-ended questions and analyzing their responses. WISP was translated into eight languages and pilot tested. WISP translations were pre-tested together with EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-C15-PAL and relevant modules, followed by patient interviews to evaluate their understanding about WISP. Proportions were used to summarize patient responses obtained from interviews and WISP.
    Results: From the seven instruments identified in the literature, only the free text collected from the PRO-CTAE has been analyzed previously. In our study, 161 cancer patients participated in the pre-testing and interviews (50% in active treatment). Qualitative interviews showed high acceptability of WISP. Among the 295 symptoms/problems reported using WISP, skin problems, sore mouth and bleeding were more prevalent in patients in active treatment, whereas numbness/tingling, dry mouth and existential problems were more prevalent in patients in palliative care/treatment.
    Conclusions: The EORTC WISP instrument was found to be acceptable and useful for symptom assessment in cancer patients. WISP improves the identification of symptoms/problems not assessed by cancer-generic questionnaires and therefore, we recommend its use alongside the EORTC questionnaires.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Quality of Life ; Symptom Assessment ; Neoplasms ; Palliative Care ; Pain ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-26
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2098765-1
    ISSN 1477-7525 ; 1477-7525
    ISSN (online) 1477-7525
    ISSN 1477-7525
    DOI 10.1186/s12955-024-02244-z
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: A systematic review of the use and validation of health-related quality of life instruments in older cancer patients.

    Fitzsimmons, Deborah / Gilbert, Jacqueline / Howse, Frances / Young, Teresa / Arrarras, Juan-Ignacio / Brédart, Anne / Hawker, Sheila / George, Steve / Aapro, Matti / Johnson, Colin D

    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)

    2009  Volume 45, Issue 1, Page(s) 19–32

    Abstract: Aim: The aim of this paper is to systematically review the use and validation of HRQOL instruments in older cancer patients.: Method: A systematic review of 5 databases and 3 research registers identified studies reporting the use and validation of ... ...

    Abstract Aim: The aim of this paper is to systematically review the use and validation of HRQOL instruments in older cancer patients.
    Method: A systematic review of 5 databases and 3 research registers identified studies reporting the use and validation of HRQOL instruments in cancer patients aged over 65 years from 1995 to mid 2007.
    Results: Thirty-one studies reported the use of HRQOL measures in older people, using a range of generic and disease-specific instruments. Little work was reported in patients aged over 80 years. All studies exhibited methodological limitations. Fourteen studies were identified with variable evidence on the psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of identified instruments.
    Conclusion: Our review identified that the development, validation and use of HRQOL instruments often ignore the specific needs of older people. This review highlights the need for a HRQOL instrument specifically designed to capture the issues and concerns most relevant to older cancer patients.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Databases, Factual ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Validation Studies as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2009-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review
    ZDB-ID 82061-1
    ISSN 1879-0852 ; 0277-5379 ; 0959-8049 ; 0964-1947
    ISSN (online) 1879-0852
    ISSN 0277-5379 ; 0959-8049 ; 0964-1947
    DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.036
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Development of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire module for older people with cancer: The EORTC QLQ-ELD15.

    Johnson, Colin / Fitzsimmons, Deborah / Gilbert, Jacqueline / Arrarras, Juan-Ignacio / Hammerlid, Eva / Bredart, Anne / Ozmen, Mahir / Dilektasli, Evren / Coolbrandt, Anne / Kenis, Cindy / Young, Teresa / Chow, Edward / Venkitaraman, Ramachandran / Howse, Frances / George, Steve / O'Connor, Steve / Yadegarfar, Ghasem

    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)

    2010  Volume 46, Issue 12, Page(s) 2242–2252

    Abstract: Background and aim: There is a lack of instruments that focus on the specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) issues that affect older people with cancer. The aim of this study was to develop a HRQOL questionnaire module to supplement the ... ...

    Abstract Background and aim: There is a lack of instruments that focus on the specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) issues that affect older people with cancer. The aim of this study was to develop a HRQOL questionnaire module to supplement the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30 for older (>70years) patients with cancer.
    Methods: Phases 1-3 were conducted in seven countries following modified EORTC Quality of Life Group guidelines for module development. Phase 1: potentially relevant issues were identified by a systematic literature review, a questionnaire survey of 17 multi-disciplinary health professionals and two rounds of qualitative interviews. The first round included 9 patients aged >70. The second round was a comparative series of interviews with 49 patients >70years with a range of cancer diagnoses and 40 patients aged 50-69years matched for gender and disease site. In Phase 2 the issues were formulated into a long provisional item list. This was administered in Phase 3 together with the QLQ-C30 to two further groups of cancer patients aged >70 (n=97) or 50-69years (n=85) to determine the importance, relevance and acceptability of each item. Redundant and duplicate items were removed; issues specific to the older group were selected for the final questionnaire.
    Results: In Phase 1, 75 issues were identified. These were reduced in Phase 2 to create a 45 item provisional list. Phase 3 testing of the provisional list led to the selection of 15 items with good range of response, high scores of importance and relevance in the older patients. This resulted in the EORTC QLQ-ELD15, containing five conceptually coherent scales (functional independence, relationships with family and friends, worries about the future, autonomy and burden of illness).
    Conclusion: The EORTC QLQ-ELD15 in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30 is ready for large-scale validation studies, and will assess HRQOL issues of most relevance and concern for older people with cancer across a wide range of cancer sites and treatment stages.
    MeSH term(s) Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Health Status ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms/psychology ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-08
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review
    ZDB-ID 82061-1
    ISSN 1879-0852 ; 0277-5379 ; 0959-8049 ; 0964-1947
    ISSN (online) 1879-0852
    ISSN 0277-5379 ; 0959-8049 ; 0964-1947
    DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.014
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top