LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Naltrexone Compared With Buprenorphine or Methadone in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

    Atluru, Sreevalli / Bruehlman, Alyssa K / Vaughn, Porcia / Schauberger, Charles W / Smid, Marcela C

    Obstetrics and gynecology

    2024  Volume 143, Issue 3, Page(s) 403–410

    Abstract: Objective: Although naltrexone is an evidence-based medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), few data are available with use in pregnancy. Our objective was to assess outcomes of pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) taking naltrexone ... ...

    Abstract Objective: Although naltrexone is an evidence-based medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), few data are available with use in pregnancy. Our objective was to assess outcomes of pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) taking naltrexone compared with those taking methadone or buprenorphine.
    Data sources: We undertook a systematic review using electronic database search (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo), conference proceedings, and trial registries including ClinicalTrials.gov .
    Methods of study selection: We conducted an electronic search of research articles through May 2023 for randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort, and retrospective cohort studies of naltrexone (oral, implant, or extended release) compared with methadone or buprenorphine (sublingual or extended release) among pregnant individuals with OUD. After double review of all articles, we abstracted obstetric (primary outcome: gestational age at delivery), neonatal (primary outcome: neonatal abstinence syndrome [NAS]), and substance use outcomes.
    Tabulation, integration, and results: Five studies met eligibility criteria; four were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a prospective cohort study. Four studies included data on gestational age at delivery (weeks) with no difference detected between the two groups in any study (mean difference ranging -0.20, 95% CI, -1.49-1.09 to 0.8, 95% CI, -0.15 to 1.75). Three studies included data on NAS with all studies detecting a lower risk in the naltrexone group compared with methadone or buprenorphine (relative risk ranging from 0.08, 95% CI, 0.01-1.16 to 0.15, 95% CI, 0.06-0.36). Most studies (four of five) had a moderate or high potential for selection bias primarily driven by small sample size and lack of controlling for confounders.
    Conclusion: Although the evidence base is limited, available data suggest that naltrexone use in pregnancy is a reasonable MOUD option with reassuring perinatal outcomes. To enhance confidence in this conclusion and to assess substance use outcomes, further comparative studies of pregnant people with OUD taking naltrexone and other MOUD types are needed.
    Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, 42017074249.
    MeSH term(s) Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Pregnancy ; Buprenorphine/therapeutic use ; Methadone/therapeutic use ; Naltrexone/therapeutic use ; Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods ; Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy ; Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies
    Chemical Substances Buprenorphine (40D3SCR4GZ) ; Methadone (UC6VBE7V1Z) ; Naltrexone (5S6W795CQM)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Systematic Review ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 207330-4
    ISSN 1873-233X ; 0029-7844
    ISSN (online) 1873-233X
    ISSN 0029-7844
    DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005510
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Sustainability of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Surrogate Decision Maker Documentation for Hospitalized Adults.

    Luty, Jacob / Waagmeester, Garrett / Ketterer, Briana / Atluru, Sreevalli / Toney, Keane / Love, Michael / DeVane, Kenneth / Sallay, Scott / DiVeronica, Matthew

    American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality

    2022  Volume 37, Issue 6, Page(s) 495–503

    Abstract: Documenting surrogate decision makers (SDMs) is an important step in advance care planning (ACP) for hospitalized adults. The authors performed a quality improvement study of clinical and electronic health record (EHR) workflows aiming to increase SDM ... ...

    Abstract Documenting surrogate decision makers (SDMs) is an important step in advance care planning (ACP) for hospitalized adults. The authors performed a quality improvement study of clinical and electronic health record (EHR) workflows aiming to increase SDM documentation for hospitalized adults. The intervention included an ACP education module, audit and feedback, as well as workflow and EHR adaptations. The authors prospectively tracked SDM documentation using control charts and used chart review to assess secondary outcome, process, and balancing measures. SDM documentation significantly increased from 69.5% to 80.2% ( P < 0.001) for intervention patients, sustained over 3 years, and was unchanged for control patients (34.6% to 36.3%; P = 0.355). There were no significant differences in secondary ACP outcomes in intervention or control patients. Clinical and EHR adaptations increased SDM documentation for hospitalized adults with minimal risk, although did not affect other ACP metrics. Future studies are needed to determine the effects of such changes on goal-concordant care.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Humans ; Documentation ; Advance Care Planning ; Electronic Health Records ; Quality Improvement ; Decision Making
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-09-26
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1131772-3
    ISSN 1555-824X ; 1062-8606
    ISSN (online) 1555-824X
    ISSN 1062-8606
    DOI 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000081
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top