LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Your last searches

  1. AU="Azarkamand, Sahar"
  2. AU="Murata, Chiori"
  3. AU="Lin, Chao-Hsu"
  4. AU="Hachach-Haram, Nadine"
  5. AU="Hayashi, Marito"
  6. AU="Long, Wanjun"
  7. AU="Tan, Yu-Qing"
  8. AU="Bellonzi, A."
  9. AU="Mesina, Anna"
  10. AU="Barrios, Joshua"
  11. AU="Mackridge, Adam J"
  12. AU="Shin, Da Wi"
  13. AU="Musmarra, Isidoro"
  14. AU="Mendenhall, Emily"
  15. AU="Hesselmann, Felicitas"

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article: Comparative assessment of two circularity indicators for the case of reusable versus single-use secondary packages for fresh foods in Spain.

    Sazdovski, Ilija / Batlle-Bayer, Laura / Bala, Alba / Margallo, Maria / Azarkamand, Sahar / Aldaco, Ruben / Fullana-I-Palmer, Pere

    Heliyon

    2024  Volume 10, Issue 6, Page(s) e27922

    Abstract: Sustainable packaging is a crucial focus in the context of circular economy efforts. This study evaluates the circularity of two secondary packaging systems used in Spanish fresh food produces: Reusable Plastic Crates and Single-use Cardboard Boxes. A ... ...

    Abstract Sustainable packaging is a crucial focus in the context of circular economy efforts. This study evaluates the circularity of two secondary packaging systems used in Spanish fresh food produces: Reusable Plastic Crates and Single-use Cardboard Boxes. A Mass Flow Analysis was performed to assess the material flows in the production and use phases of both systems and two circular indicators were applied: the Material Circularity Indicator and Product Circular Indicator. While most previous studies for single-use packaging use these indicators at the product level, this study applies a system approach since the Reusable Plastic Crates can be reused 100 times. The functional unit was defined as the distribution of 1000 tonnes of fresh products, resulting in the distribution of 6,666,700 packages with 15 kg of products. The Material Circularity Indicator and Product Circular Indicator results show that Reusable Plastic Crates are more circular than Single-use Cardboard Boxes. The Product Circular Indicator provides a more comprehensive assessment of circularity by considering multiple life cycle stages, efficiency, and unrecoverable waste, resulting in a difference in circularity evaluations. The indicators used have limitations as they do not consider the resource stock. Further research is needed to explore this aspect.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-12
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2835763-2
    ISSN 2405-8440
    ISSN 2405-8440
    DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27922
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Insights on the environmental management system of the European port sector

    Puig, Martí / Azarkamand, Sahar / Wooldridge, Chris / Selén, Valter / Darbra, R.M.

    Science of the total environment. 2022 Feb. 01, v. 806

    2022  

    Abstract: This research focusses on assessing the environmental performance of European Ports based on a wide representation of EcoPorts members. The data is extracted from the Self-Diagnosis Method (SDM), a concise checklist against which port managers can self- ... ...

    Abstract This research focusses on assessing the environmental performance of European Ports based on a wide representation of EcoPorts members. The data is extracted from the Self-Diagnosis Method (SDM), a concise checklist against which port managers can self-assess the environmental management of their port in relation to the performance of the EcoPorts membership. A total number of 97 ports from 18 different European Maritime States contributed to this evaluation. They have answered questions related to the main components of internationally recognized Environmental Management System (EMS) standards. Similar periodic assessments have been carried out since 2013, allowing for the identification of benchmark performance. The geographical representation and characteristics of the participating ports are given along with the perceived ranking of priority environmental issues based on regular reviews. Air quality has been the top environmental priority for many years, followed by climate change, which has risen rapidly to the second position. Most of the ports have an environmental policy in place (96%) and a compilation of an inventory of significant environmental aspects (92%). Transparency is also very important to ports, with 91% of ports communicating their environmental policy to stakeholders, and 86% of ports making it publicly available on their website.Around 80% of ports have set up an environmental monitoring program, with port waste being the most monitored issue.With regard to services to shipping, more than half of the responding ports are offering on shore power supply (OPS), and one third of them have made LNG bunkering available. In parallel, an increasing number of ports compared with previous exercises (57%) provide differentiated dues for ships that go beyond regulatory standards, with air emissions, waste and climate change being the main target of these discounts. In general, trends over the years have shown a clear improvement of the environmental port performance.
    Keywords air ; air quality ; climate change ; environment ; environmental performance ; environmental policy ; inventories ; management systems ; stakeholders ; wastes
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2022-0201
    Publishing place Elsevier B.V.
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 121506-1
    ISSN 1879-1026 ; 0048-9697
    ISSN (online) 1879-1026
    ISSN 0048-9697
    DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150550
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Review of Initiatives and Methodologies to Reduce CO

    Azarkamand, Sahar / Wooldridge, Chris / Darbra, R M

    International journal of environmental research and public health

    2020  Volume 17, Issue 11

    Abstract: Ports are important infrastructures for economic growth and development. Among the most significant environmental aspects of ports that contribute to the issue of climate change are those due to carbon dioxide emissions generated by port activities. ... ...

    Abstract Ports are important infrastructures for economic growth and development. Among the most significant environmental aspects of ports that contribute to the issue of climate change are those due to carbon dioxide emissions generated by port activities. Given the importance of this topic, this paper gathers initiatives and methodologies that have been undertaken to calculate and reduce CO
    MeSH term(s) Carbon Dioxide ; Carbon Footprint ; Climate Change ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Gases ; Greenhouse Effect
    Chemical Substances Gases ; Carbon Dioxide (142M471B3J)
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-29
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 1660-4601
    ISSN (online) 1660-4601
    DOI 10.3390/ijerph17113858
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Calculating the Carbon Footprint in ports by using a standardized tool.

    Azarkamand, Sahar / Ferré, Guillem / Darbra, R M

    The Science of the total environment

    2020  Volume 734, Page(s) 139407

    Abstract: One of the significant environmental threats in ports in recent years are carbon dioxide emissions generated by different activities carried out in these areas, which lead to Climate Change. In the maritime industry, this topic is getting more critical ... ...

    Abstract One of the significant environmental threats in ports in recent years are carbon dioxide emissions generated by different activities carried out in these areas, which lead to Climate Change. In the maritime industry, this topic is getting more critical every day. The main cause of Climate Change is the emission of Greenhouse Gases (GHG). The total amount of GHG that are emitted both directly and indirectly by an activity are calculated by the following indicator: the Carbon Footprint. The review of different case studies shows while in recent years many ports calculate their Carbon Footprint and report it, each port uses its own method and there is not any unified and complete method to calculate Carbon Footprint. This makes comparing results among different ports a difficult task and proves the need for such a method. Therefore, it has been developed a standardized tool to calculate GHG emissions in ports. The tool has been developed by using Excel and Visual Basic software and it is based on the WPCI (World Ports Climate Initiative) and IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) guidelines and the GHG Protocol. Such tool is specifically designed so that port authorities can calculate their Carbon Footprint and report it accordingly. The tool has different steps taking into account the three scopes of emissions defined by the WPCI guideline for ports. Once developed, it was validated by a set of selected ports and environmental experts. The final aim is to distribute this tool to all ports and make it freely available.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-15
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 121506-1
    ISSN 1879-1026 ; 0048-9697
    ISSN (online) 1879-1026
    ISSN 0048-9697
    DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139407
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Insights on the environmental management system of the European port sector.

    Puig, Martí / Azarkamand, Sahar / Wooldridge, Chris / Selén, Valter / Darbra, R M

    The Science of the total environment

    2021  Volume 806, Issue Pt 2, Page(s) 150550

    Abstract: This research focusses on assessing the environmental performance of European Ports based on a wide representation of EcoPorts members. The data is extracted from the Self-Diagnosis Method (SDM), a concise checklist against which port managers can self- ... ...

    Abstract This research focusses on assessing the environmental performance of European Ports based on a wide representation of EcoPorts members. The data is extracted from the Self-Diagnosis Method (SDM), a concise checklist against which port managers can self-assess the environmental management of their port in relation to the performance of the EcoPorts membership. A total number of 97 ports from 18 different European Maritime States contributed to this evaluation. They have answered questions related to the main components of internationally recognized Environmental Management System (EMS) standards. Similar periodic assessments have been carried out since 2013, allowing for the identification of benchmark performance. The geographical representation and characteristics of the participating ports are given along with the perceived ranking of priority environmental issues based on regular reviews. Air quality has been the top environmental priority for many years, followed by climate change, which has risen rapidly to the second position. Most of the ports have an environmental policy in place (96%) and a compilation of an inventory of significant environmental aspects (92%). Transparency is also very important to ports, with 91% of ports communicating their environmental policy to stakeholders, and 86% of ports making it publicly available on their website. Around 80% of ports have set up an environmental monitoring program, with port waste being the most monitored issue. With regard to services to shipping, more than half of the responding ports are offering on shore power supply (OPS), and one third of them have made LNG bunkering available. In parallel, an increasing number of ports compared with previous exercises (57%) provide differentiated dues for ships that go beyond regulatory standards, with air emissions, waste and climate change being the main target of these discounts. In general, trends over the years have shown a clear improvement of the environmental port performance.
    MeSH term(s) Air Pollution ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Policy ; Ships
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-24
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 121506-1
    ISSN 1879-1026 ; 0048-9697
    ISSN (online) 1879-1026
    ISSN 0048-9697
    DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150550
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top