LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Association of Three Novel Inflammatory Markers: Lymphocyte to HDL-C Ratio, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to HDL-C Ratio and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to Lymphocyte Ratio With Metabolic Syndrome.

Kolahi Ahari, Rana / Akbari, Nazanin / Babaeepoor, Negin / Fallahi, Zahra / Saffar Soflaei, Sara / Ferns, Gordon / Ebrahimi, Mahmoud / Moohebati, Mohsen / Esmaily, Habibollah / Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid

Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism

2024  Volume 7, Issue 3, Page(s) e00479

Abstract: Objective: We aimed to compare the association of three novel inflammatory indicators with metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Mashhad stroke and heart atherosclerotic disorder (MASHAD) cohort participants.: Methods: According to the International ... ...

Abstract Objective: We aimed to compare the association of three novel inflammatory indicators with metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Mashhad stroke and heart atherosclerotic disorder (MASHAD) cohort participants.
Methods: According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, the cohort participants were divided into the MetS(+) and MetS(-) groups. The lymphocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (LHR), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) to HDL-C ratio (HCHR) and hs-CRP to lymphocyte ratio (HCLR) were calculated and were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed to find the association of the indices with the presence of MetS among men and women. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to establish cut-off values in predicting MetS for men and women. p-Values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results: Among a total of 8890 participants (5500 MetS(-) and 3390 MetS(+)), LHR, HCHR and HCLR were significantly higher in the MetS(+) group than in MetS(-) group (p < 0.001). In LR analysis, after adjusting for multiple cofounders, LHR remained an independent factor for the presence of MetS among men (OR: 1.254; 95% CI: 1.202-1.308; p < 0.001) and women (OR: 1.393; 95% CI: 1.340-1.448; p < 0.001). HCHR also remained an independent factor for the presence of MetS only in women (OR: 1.058; 95% CI: 1.043-1.073; p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that LHR had the higher AUC for predicting MetS in both men (AUC: 0.627; 95% CI: 0.611-0.643; p < 0.001) and women (AUC: 0.683; 95% CI: 0.670, 0.696; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This suggests that among both genders, the LHR as an inexpensive and easy-to-access marker has a better diagnostic performance and could be a promising alternative to the traditional expensive inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP for the evaluation of inflammation in patients with MetS.
MeSH term(s) Humans ; Male ; Female ; Metabolic Syndrome/diagnosis ; Metabolic Syndrome/etiology ; Metabolic Syndrome/metabolism ; C-Reactive Protein/metabolism ; Cholesterol, HDL ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Lymphocytes/metabolism
Chemical Substances C-Reactive Protein (9007-41-4) ; Cholesterol, HDL
Language English
Publishing date 2024-04-08
Publishing country England
Document type Journal Article
ISSN 2398-9238
ISSN (online) 2398-9238
DOI 10.1002/edm2.479
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top