LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Predictive factors of COVID-19 in patients with negative RT-qPCR.

    López de la Iglesia, J / Fernández-Villa, T / Rivero, A / Carvajal, A / Bay Simon, E / Martínez Martínez, M / Argüello, H / Puente, H / Fernández Vázquez, J P

    Semergen

    2020  Volume 46 Suppl 1, Page(s) 6–11

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the factors associated with false negatives in RT-qPCR in patients with mild-moderate symptoms of COVID-19.: Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study that used a random sample of non-hospitalized patients from ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To evaluate the factors associated with false negatives in RT-qPCR in patients with mild-moderate symptoms of COVID-19.
    Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study that used a random sample of non-hospitalized patients from the primary care management division of the Healthcare Area of Leon (58 RT-qPCR-positive cases and 52 RT-qPCR-negative cases). Information regarding symptoms was collected and all patients were simultaneously tested using two rapid diagnostic tests - RDTs (Combined - cRDT and Differentiated - dRDT). The association between symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 infection was evaluated by non-conditional logistic regression, with estimation of Odds Ratio.
    Results: A total of 110 subjects were studied, 52% of whom were women (mean age: 48.2±11.0 years). There were 42.3% of negative RT-qPCRs that were positive in some RDTs. Fever over 38°C (present in 35.5% of cases) and anosmia (present in 41.8%) were the symptoms most associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, a relationship that remained statistically significant in patients with negative RT-qPCR and some positive RDT (aOR=6.64; 95%CI=1.33-33.13 and aOR=19.38; 95% CI=3.69-101.89, respectively).
    Conclusions: RT-qPCR is the technique of choice in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it is not exempt from false negatives. Our results show that patients who present mild or moderate symptoms with negative RT-qPCR, but with fever and/or anosmia, should be considered as suspicious cases and should be evaluated with other diagnostic methods.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques ; Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-23
    Publishing country Spain
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 1578-8865
    ISSN (online) 1578-8865
    DOI 10.1016/j.semerg.2020.06.010
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Predictive factors of COVID-19 in patients with negative RT-qPCR

    López de la Iglesia, J / Fernández-Villa, T / Rivero, A / Carvajal, A / Bay Simon, E / Martínez Martínez, M / Argüello, H / Puente, H / Fernández Vázquez, J P

    Semergen

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors associated with false negatives in RT-qPCR in patients with mild-moderate symptoms of COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that used a random sample of non-hospitalized patients from the ... ...

    Abstract OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors associated with false negatives in RT-qPCR in patients with mild-moderate symptoms of COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that used a random sample of non-hospitalized patients from the primary care management division of the Healthcare Area of Leon (58 RT-qPCR-positive cases and 52 RT-qPCR-negative cases). Information regarding symptoms was collected and all patients were simultaneously tested using two rapid diagnostic tests - RDTs (Combined - cRDT and Differentiated - dRDT). The association between symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 infection was evaluated by non-conditional logistic regression, with estimation of Odds Ratio. RESULTS: A total of 110 subjects were studied, 52% of whom were women (mean age: 48.2±11.0 years). There were 42.3% of negative RT-qPCRs that were positive in some RDTs. Fever over 38°C (present in 35.5% of cases) and anosmia (present in 41.8%) were the symptoms most associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, a relationship that remained statistically significant in patients with negative RT-qPCR and some positive RDT (aOR=6.64; 95%CI=1.33-33.13 and aOR=19.38; 95% CI=3.69-101.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RT-qPCR is the technique of choice in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it is not exempt from false negatives. Our results show that patients who present mild or moderate symptoms with negative RT-qPCR, but with fever and/or anosmia, should be considered as suspicious cases and should be evaluated with other diagnostic methods.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #611306
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Predictive factors of COVID-19 in patients with negative RT-qPCR

    López de la Iglesia, J. / Fernández-Villa, T. / Rivero, A. / Carvajal, A. / Bay Simon, E. / Martínez Martínez, M. / Argüello, H. / Puente, H. / Fernández Vázquez, J.P.

    Medicina de Familia. SEMERGEN

    2020  Volume 46, Page(s) 6–11

    Keywords Family Practice ; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher Elsevier BV
    Publishing country us
    Document type Article ; Online
    ISSN 1138-3593
    DOI 10.1016/j.semerg.2020.06.010
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top