LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 66

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Author Response to Sahrmann.

    Joyce, Christopher T / Beneciuk, Jason M / George, Steven Z

    Physical therapy

    2024  

    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 415886-6
    ISSN 1538-6724 ; 0031-9023
    ISSN (online) 1538-6724
    ISSN 0031-9023
    DOI 10.1093/ptj/pzae035
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Concerns on the Science and Practice of a Movement System.

    Joyce, Christopher T / Beneciuk, Jason M / George, Steven Z

    Physical therapy

    2023  Volume 103, Issue 12

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Movement ; Science
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 415886-6
    ISSN 1538-6724 ; 0031-9023
    ISSN (online) 1538-6724
    ISSN 0031-9023
    DOI 10.1093/ptj/pzad087
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Emergency Department Discharge Teaching Interventions: A Scoping Review.

    Carey, Alexandria / Starkweather, Angela / Bai, Ailiya / Horgas, Ann / Cho, Hwayoung / Beneciuk, Jason M

    Journal of emergency nursing

    2024  

    Abstract: Introduction: Emergency department discharge education is intended to provide patients with information to self-manage their condition or injury, identify potential complications, and follow-up or referral. However, most patients cannot recall the ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Emergency department discharge education is intended to provide patients with information to self-manage their condition or injury, identify potential complications, and follow-up or referral. However, most patients cannot recall the discharge information provided, leading to adverse clinical outcomes, return visits, and higher costs. A scoping review was undertaken to explore discharge education interventions that have been studied in the emergency department setting and outcomes that have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.
    Methods: A literature review was conducted using the databases PubMed/Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Education Resources Information Center, with search terms focused on emergency nursing and patient discharge education interventions.
    Results: Of the publications identified, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was variation among studies on the conditions/injuries and populations of focus for the intervention. The interventions were categorized by learning styles, including auditory (n=10), kinesthetic (n=1), visual (n=15), reading/writing (n=1), and multimodal (n=7). Outcomes evaluated included those that were patient-specific (education, self-management, clinical, and adherence) and metrics of the health system and public health.
    Discussion: Multimodal discharge education that addresses various learning styles and levels of health literacy improved patient education, self-management, and clinical outcomes. Additional support and reminders improved patient adherence. Identified gaps included limited kinesthetic interventions and culturally tailored education. Translational science for advancing sustainable interventions in clinical practice is needed to enhance the emergency department discharge process and patient, system, and public health outcomes.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 604632-0
    ISSN 1527-2966 ; 0099-1767
    ISSN (online) 1527-2966
    ISSN 0099-1767
    DOI 10.1016/j.jen.2023.12.012
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Procedural Drift: An Underappreciated Element of Clinical Treatment Fidelity.

    Cook, Chad E / Beneciuk, Jason M / George, Steven Z

    The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy

    2022  Volume 52, Issue 2, Page(s) 63–66

    Abstract: Synopsis: Procedural fidelity involves delivering the correct guideline-supported treatment choice, in its designed manner, over the full care episode of the patient. Procedural drift is a subcomponent of procedural fidelity that involves performing the ...

    Abstract Synopsis: Procedural fidelity involves delivering the correct guideline-supported treatment choice, in its designed manner, over the full care episode of the patient. Procedural drift is a subcomponent of procedural fidelity that involves performing the right treatment the right way initially, then drifting toward suboptimal treatment over time. Procedural drift occurs most often when providing intricate, patient-centered interventions that require attention to subtle nuances that potentially maximize their effectiveness. Drift comes from the belief that subtle nuances do not matter, or from a lack of motivation or incentive to maintain high fidelity. Strategies to reduce drift in practice include investment in early, high-quality training; using checklists and manuals when providing an intervention; using risk-adjusted patient data as a checks-and-balances system; and incorporating measures of drift in the practitioner's annual review.
    MeSH term(s) Checklist ; Humans ; Research Report
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-31
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 604640-x
    ISSN 1938-1344 ; 0190-6011
    ISSN (online) 1938-1344
    ISSN 0190-6011
    DOI 10.2519/jospt.2022.10961
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Adding Physical Impairment to Risk Stratification Improved Outcome Prediction in Low Back Pain.

    Beneciuk, Jason M / George, Steven Z

    Physical therapy

    2020  Volume 101, Issue 1

    Abstract: Objective: Identifying subgroups of low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve prediction of clinical outcomes. Risk stratification is one such strategy that identifies similar characteristics indicative of a common clinical outcome trajectory. ... ...

    Abstract Objective: Identifying subgroups of low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve prediction of clinical outcomes. Risk stratification is one such strategy that identifies similar characteristics indicative of a common clinical outcome trajectory. The purpose of this study was to determine if an empirically derived subgrouping approach based on physical impairment measures improves information provided from the STarT Back Tool (SBT).
    Methods: At baseline in this secondary analysis of a cohort study, patients (N = 144) receiving physical therapy for LBP completed the SBT and tests (active lumbar flexion, extension, lateral bending, and passive straight-leg raise) from a validated physical impairment index. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 4 weeks and included the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index. Exploratory hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis identified empirically derived subgroups based on physical impairment measures. Independent samples t testing and chi-square analysis were used to assess baseline subgroup differences in demographic and clinical measures. Spearman rho correlation coefficient was used to assess baseline SBT risk and impairment subgroup relationships, and a 3-way mixed-model ANOVA was used to assessed SBT risk and impairment subgroup relationships with clinical outcomes at 4 weeks.
    Results: Two physical impairment-based subgroups emerged from cluster analysis: (1) low-risk impairment (n = 119, 81.5%), characterized by greater lumbar mobility; and (2) high-risk impairment (n = 25, 17.1%), characterized by less lumbar mobility. A weak, positive relationship was observed between baseline SBT risk and impairment subgroups (rs = .170). An impairment-by-SBT risk-by-time interaction effect was observed for Oswestry Disability Index scores but not for Numerical Pain Rating Scale scores at 4 weeks.
    Conclusions: Physical impairment subgroups were not redundant with SBT risk categories and could improve prediction of 4-week LBP disability outcomes. Physical impairment subgroups did not improve the prediction of 4-week pain intensity scores.
    Impact: Subgroups based on physical impairment and psychosocial risk could lead to better prediction of LBP disability outcomes and eventually allow for treatment options tailored to physical and psychosocial risk.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain/physiopathology ; Low Back Pain/rehabilitation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Physical Examination ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Prognosis ; Risk Assessment
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-09-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Observational Study ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 415886-6
    ISSN 1538-6724 ; 0031-9023
    ISSN (online) 1538-6724
    ISSN 0031-9023
    DOI 10.1093/ptj/pzaa179
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Virtual Rehabilitation and COVID-19: Varied Adoption and Satisfaction Among Patients and Providers Participating in a Multi-Site Survey Study.

    Manes, Mindi R / Burnfield, Judith M / Boersma, Kelsey / Peoples, Jason / Davis, Anita / Beneciuk, Jason M / Bialosky, Joel / Jordan, Katelyn / Osborne, Raine

    Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

    2024  Volume 61, Page(s) 469580231222334

    Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic compelled rapid healthcare adaptations including increased use of telehealth (TH) and virtual care (VC) to provide rehabilitation services. This multi-site cross-sectional survey study examined rehabilitation patients' and providers' ...

    Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic compelled rapid healthcare adaptations including increased use of telehealth (TH) and virtual care (VC) to provide rehabilitation services. This multi-site cross-sectional survey study examined rehabilitation patients' and providers' experiences with service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of TH/VC. Patients and providers who received or provided rehabilitation services were recruited from 1 of 3 large, post-acute rehabilitation systems located in the Southeastern and Midwestern United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants rated personal satisfaction with rehabilitation services received or rendered during the pandemic and willingness to use TH/VC in the future. Questions also addressed accessibility, ease of use, and perceived barriers to TH/VC use. The adoption and personal satisfaction of TH/VC for rehabilitation care varied between patients and providers. Patients reported higher levels of satisfaction compared to providers (
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Patient Satisfaction ; Telerehabilitation ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Pandemics ; COVID-19 ; Telemedicine ; Personal Satisfaction
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 42153-4
    ISSN 1945-7243 ; 0046-9580
    ISSN (online) 1945-7243
    ISSN 0046-9580
    DOI 10.1177/00469580231222334
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Management of acute neck pain: A case series describing immediate and short term clinical outcomes following use of the Multifidus Isometric Technique.

    Viti, James A / Beneciuk, Jason M

    Journal of bodywork and movement therapies

    2019  Volume 23, Issue 4, Page(s) 888–893

    Abstract: Background: Acute facet capsular entrapment results in sudden onset of pain and reduced ability to perform active cervical motions. The Multifidus Isometric Technique (MIT) is a type of manual therapy intervention theorized to target the entrapped facet ...

    Abstract Background: Acute facet capsular entrapment results in sudden onset of pain and reduced ability to perform active cervical motions. The Multifidus Isometric Technique (MIT) is a type of manual therapy intervention theorized to target the entrapped facet capsule and pull the entrapped synovial folds from the facet joint resulting in decreased pain and increased function.
    Purpose: To describe immediate MIT clinical outcomes for patients with acute neck pain.
    Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 30; 70% female) with sudden onset of neck pain received MIT within 48 hours of symptom onset. Clinical outcome measures included: 1) 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); 2) cervical AROM, and 3) the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Paired-sample t-testing was used to assess for within and between-session changes in outcome measure scores.
    Results: Within-session NPRS improvements were observed during all cervical AROM movements (p < .01), with initial treatment associated with greater improvements on average (M = 2.4 ± 1.6 points) compared to the second treatment (M = 0.6 ± 0.9 points). Similarly, most within-session AROM measures improved during both sessions (p < .01) with greater average improvements observed following the initial treatment session and for cervical rotation to the symptomatic side (M = 26.5 ± 9.6 vs. 8.0 ± 9.7°). Between-session NDI scores improved (M = 15.3 ± 9.8, p < .01) with approximately 60% of patients achieving a minimally clinically important difference of 14 percentage points.
    Discussion: The MIT is a potentially beneficial intervention for patients with acute neck pain. Future studies consisting of longer follow-up time points and comparison treatment groups are needed to test MIT effectiveness.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods ; Neck Pain/therapy ; Pain Measurement ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-02-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2029441-4
    ISSN 1532-9283 ; 1360-8592
    ISSN (online) 1532-9283
    ISSN 1360-8592
    DOI 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.02.008
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Validation of the Keele STarT MSK Tool for Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain in United States-based Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings.

    Beneciuk, Jason M / Michener, Lori A / Sigman, Erica / Harrison, Trent / Buzzanca-Fried, Katherine E / Lu, Xinlin / Shan, Guogen / Hill, Jonathan C

    The journal of pain

    2024  

    Abstract: The STarT MSK tool was developed to enable risk stratification of patients with common musculoskeletal (MSK) pain conditions and help identify individuals who may require more targeted interventions or closer monitoring in primary care settings, however, ...

    Abstract The STarT MSK tool was developed to enable risk stratification of patients with common musculoskeletal (MSK) pain conditions and help identify individuals who may require more targeted interventions or closer monitoring in primary care settings, however, its validity in U.S.-based outpatient physical therapy settings has not been investigated. The 10-item Keele STarT MSK risk stratification tool was tested for construct (convergent and discriminant) and predictive validity using a multicenter, prospective cohort study design. Participants (n = 141) receiving physical therapy for MSK pain of the back, neck, shoulder, hip, knee, or multisite regions completed intake questionnaires including the Keele STarT MSK tool, Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI), Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Review-of-Systems and Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag tools. Pain intensity, pain interference, and health-related quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) physical [PCS] and mental [MCS] component summary scores) were measured at 2- and 6-month follow-up. Participants were classified as STarT MSK tool low (44%), medium (39%), and high (17%) risk. Follow-up rates were 70.2% (2 months) and 49.6% (6 months). For convergent validity, fair relationships were observed between the STarT MSK tool and FCI and SF-8 MCS (r = .35-.37) while moderate-to-good relationships (r = .51-.72) were observed for 7 other clinical measures. For discriminant validity, STarT MSK tool risk-dependent relationships were observed for Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Review-of-Systems, Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag, pain interference, and SF-8 PCS (low < medium < high; P < .01) and FCI, pain intensity, and SF-8 MCS (low < medium-or-high; P < .01). For predictive validity, intake STarT MSK tool scores explained additional variability in pain intensity (11.2%, 20.0%), pain interference (7.5%, 14.1%), and SF-8 PCS (8.2%, 12.8%) scores at 2 and 6 months, respectively. This study contributes to the existing literature by providing additional evidence of STarT MSK tool cross-sectional construct validity and longitudinal predictive validity. PERSPECTIVE: This study presents STarT MSK risk stratification tool validity findings from a U.S. outpatient physical therapy sample. The STarT MSK tool has the potential to help physical therapists identify individuals presenting with the most common MSK pain conditions who may require more targeted interventions or closer monitoring.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-17
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2018789-0
    ISSN 1528-8447 ; 1526-5900
    ISSN (online) 1528-8447
    ISSN 1526-5900
    DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.01.340
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: On "Fragility and Back Pain: Lessons From the Frontiers of Biopsychosocial Practice." Nicholls DA. Phys Ther. 2023; 103:pzad040. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzad040.

    Beneciuk, Jason M / George, Steven Z / Simon, Corey B / Ballengee, Lindsay A / Lentz, Trevor A / Greco, Carol M / Main, Chris J / Keefe, Francis J

    Physical therapy

    2024  Volume 104, Issue 3

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Back Pain/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 415886-6
    ISSN 1538-6724 ; 0031-9023
    ISSN (online) 1538-6724
    ISSN 0031-9023
    DOI 10.1093/ptj/pzae002
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Screening for Yellow Flags in Orthopaedic Physical Therapy: A Clinical Framework.

    Stearns, Zachary R / Carvalho, Marissa L / Beneciuk, Jason M / Lentz, Trevor A

    The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy

    2021  Volume 51, Issue 9, Page(s) 459–469

    Abstract: Background: Psychological factors influence or are associated with physical function, pain, and health care costs among individuals with musculoskeletal pain conditions. Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for psychological factors ( ... ...

    Abstract Background: Psychological factors influence or are associated with physical function, pain, and health care costs among individuals with musculoskeletal pain conditions. Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for psychological factors (also referred to as "yellow flags") in physical therapy practice to help understand prognosis and inform shared decision making for treatment.
    Clinical question: Despite the urgings of clinical practice guidelines and evidence of the influence of psychological factors on clinical outcomes, screening for yellow flags is uncommon in clinical practice. Clinicians may feel uncertain about how to integrate screening tools into clinical practice, and how screening results might inform decision making and care coordination.
    Key results: We outline a 3-step framework for routine yellow flag screening in physical therapy practice: (1) establish a standard first-line screening instrument and process, (2) interpret the results to inform shared decision making, and (3) monitor treatment progress. Four case examples illustrate how yellow flag screening can help clinicians and patients decide whether the patient might benefit most from standard physical therapy, psychologically informed physical therapy, psychologically informed physical therapy with referral to another health care provider, or immediate referral.
    Clinical application: Consider incorporating a standard yellow flag screening process into usual musculoskeletal health care. We present a framework to guide yellow flag screening in practice (1) to help inform treatment pathway selection and (2) to enhance interdisciplinary communication.
    MeSH term(s) Decision Making, Shared ; Humans ; Mass Screening/methods ; Musculoskeletal Pain/psychology ; Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy ; Orthopedics/education ; Physical Therapy Modalities/education
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 604640-x
    ISSN 1938-1344 ; 0190-6011
    ISSN (online) 1938-1344
    ISSN 0190-6011
    DOI 10.2519/jospt.2021.10570
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top