LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article: Redo aortic valve replacement

Gatta, Francesca / Haqzad, Yama / Gradinariu, George / Malvindi, Pietro Giorgio / Khalid, Zubair / Suelo-Calanao, Rona L / Moawad, Nader / Bashir, Aladdin / Rogers, Luke J / Lloyd, Clinton / Nguyen, Bao / Booth, Karen / Wang, Lu / Al-Attar, Nawwar / McDowall, Neil / Watkins, Stuart / Sayeed, Rana / Baghdadi, Saleh / D'Alessio, Andrea /
Monteagudo-Vela, Maria / Djordjevic, Jasmina / Goricar, Matej / Hoppe, Solveig / Bocking, Charlotte / Hussain, Azar / Evans, Betsy / Arif, Salman / Malkin, Christopher / Field, Mark / Sandhu, Kully / Harky, Amer / Torky, Ahmed / Uddin, Mauin / Abdulhakeem, Muhammad / Kenawy, Ayman / Massey, John / Cartwright, Neil / Tyson, Nathan / Nicou, Niki / Baig, Kamran / Jones, Mark / Aljanadi, Firas / Owens, Colum G / Oyebanji, Tunde / Doyle, Joseph / Spence, Mark S / Brennan, Paul F / Manoharan, Ganesh / Ramadan, Taha / Ohri, Sunil / Loubani, Mahmoud

Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace

2023  Volume 94, Issue 1

Abstract: This study sought to compare the morbidity and mortality of redo aortic valve replacement (redo-AVR) versus valve-in-valve trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (valve-in-valve TAVI) for patients with a failing bioprosthetic valve. A multicenter UK ... ...

Abstract This study sought to compare the morbidity and mortality of redo aortic valve replacement (redo-AVR) versus valve-in-valve trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (valve-in-valve TAVI) for patients with a failing bioprosthetic valve. A multicenter UK retrospective study of redo-AVR or valve-in-valve TAVI for patients referred for redo aortic valve intervention due to a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis. Propensity score matching was performed for confounding factors. From July 2005 to April 2021, 911 patients underwent redo-AVR and 411 patients underwent valve-in-valve TAVI. There were 125 pairs for analysis after propensity score matching. The mean age was 75.2±8.5 years. In-hospital mortality was 7.2% (n=9) for redo-AVR versus 0 for valve-in-valve TAVI, p=0.002. Surgical patients suffered more post-operative complications, including intra-aortic balloon pump support (p=0.02), early re-operation (p<0.001), arrhythmias (p<0.001), respiratory and neurological complications (p=0.02 and p=0.03) and multi-organ failure (p=0.01). The valve-in-valve TAVI group had a shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay (p<0.001 for both). However, moderate aortic regurgitation at discharge and higher post-procedural gradients were more common after valve-in-valve TAVI (p<0.001 for both). Survival probabilities in patients who were successfully discharged from the hospital were similar after valve-in-valve TAVI and redo-AVR over the 6-year follow-up (log-rank p=0.26). In elderly patients with a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis, valve-in-valve TAVI provides better early outcomes as opposed to redo-AVR, although there was no difference in mid-term survival in patients successfully discharged from the hospital.
MeSH term(s) Humans ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Valve/surgery ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery ; Catheters ; United Kingdom/epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Risk Factors ; Bioprosthesis/adverse effects
Language English
Publishing date 2023-04-19
Publishing country Italy
Document type Multicenter Study ; Journal Article
ZDB-ID 1160940-0
ISSN 1122-0643 ; 1120-0391
ISSN 1122-0643 ; 1120-0391
DOI 10.4081/monaldi.2023.2546
Shelf mark
Zs.B 65: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top