LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: COVID-19, Patents and the Never-Ending Tension between Proprietary Rights and the Protection of Public Health

    BONADIO, Enrico / BALDINI, Andrea

    European Journal of Risk Regulation

    2020  Volume 11, Issue 2, Page(s) 390–395

    Keywords Safety Research ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publishing country uk
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 2600871-3
    ISSN 2190-8249 ; 1867-299X
    ISSN (online) 2190-8249
    ISSN 1867-299X
    DOI 10.1017/err.2020.24
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: The Court of Justice of the European Union changes its case law on patentability of human embryonic stem cells.

    Bonadio, Enrico / Rovati, Angelo Maria

    Revista de derecho y genoma humano = Law and the human genome review

    2015  , Issue 42, Page(s) 161–167

    Abstract: On 18 December 2014, in International Stem Cell Corporation v. Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (C-364/13), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered an important decision regarding the scope of the exclusion from ...

    Abstract On 18 December 2014, in International Stem Cell Corporation v. Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (C-364/13), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered an important decision regarding the scope of the exclusion from patentability on morality-related grounds under Article 6(2) of the EU Biotech Directive. The Court made an important distinction between embryonic stem cell technologies based on fertilised human ovum and those based on unfertilised human ovum stimulated by parthenogenesis. The CJEU held, in particular, that a human ovum: (i) who is unfertilized and (ii) whose division and further development has been stimulated by parthenogenesis, is not a human embryo under Article 6(2)(c) of the Biotech Directive, if it in itself has not the inherent capacity of developing into a human being, this matter to be ascertained by the national court in the light of current scientific knowledge. By doing so, the Court clarified its previous ruling in Brüstle (October 2011).
    MeSH term(s) European Union ; Human Embryonic Stem Cells ; Humans ; Patents as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence
    Language English
    Publishing date 2015-01
    Publishing country Spain
    Document type Journal Article ; Legal Cases
    ISSN 1134-7198
    ISSN 1134-7198
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top