Article ; Online: Evidence for the standard model, multiple trace theory, or the unified theory?
2022 Volume 13, Issue 3-4, Page(s) 151–153
Abstract: There have been two dominating theories for memory consolidation: the standard model (SM) and multiple trace theory (MTT). Whereas lesion studies have largely indicated a waning role for the hippocampus in memory consolidation, and thus have supported SM, ...
Abstract | There have been two dominating theories for memory consolidation: the standard model (SM) and multiple trace theory (MTT). Whereas lesion studies have largely indicated a waning role for the hippocampus in memory consolidation, and thus have supported SM, findings from neuroimaging studies have produced varying results. Tallman et al. (this issue) argue that this variability may result from confounding factors and that, once these factors are accounted for, their neuroimaging results support SM. They do not, however, consider a third option: the unified theory. Here, we suggest that their findings, along with neurobiochemical and engram cell studies, may better fit this third theory. |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Humans ; Memory ; Hippocampus ; Memory Consolidation |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2022-05-23 |
Publishing country | England |
Document type | Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Comment |
ZDB-ID | 2542443-9 |
ISSN | 1758-8936 ; 1758-8928 |
ISSN (online) | 1758-8936 |
ISSN | 1758-8928 |
DOI | 10.1080/17588928.2022.2076663 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.