LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 6 of total 6

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Advancing deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Burdick, Adam P / Foote, Kelly D

    Expert review of neurotherapeutics

    2011  Volume 11, Issue 3, Page(s) 341–344

    Abstract: Evaluation of: Denys D, Mantione M, Figee M et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 67(10), 1061-1068 (2010). Herein we review a prospective trial of deep brain ... ...

    Abstract Evaluation of: Denys D, Mantione M, Figee M et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 67(10), 1061-1068 (2010). Herein we review a prospective trial of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of severely debilitating, medication-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) recently published in Archives of General Psychiatry by Denys et al. This prospective 16-subject study, while having some technical limitations, is an excellent addition to the existing literature supporting the use of DBS in the region of the nucleus accumbens for severe OCD. It provides further evidence of efficacy and safety, sham versus active stimulation evidence that this efficacy is real, and several key observations on how DBS interacts with the brain that can shed light on the neuropathophysiology of OCD itself.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2011-03
    Publishing country England
    Document type Comment ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2112534-X
    ISSN 1744-8360 ; 1473-7175
    ISSN (online) 1744-8360
    ISSN 1473-7175
    DOI 10.1586/ern.11.20
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Relationship between higher rates of adverse events in deep brain stimulation using standardized prospective recording and patient outcomes.

    Burdick, Adam P / Fernandez, Hubert H / Okun, Michael S / Chi, Yueh-Yun / Jacobson, Charles / Foote, Kelly D

    Neurosurgical focus

    2010  Volume 29, Issue 2, Page(s) E4

    Abstract: Object: Adverse event (AE) rates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) are variable, due to various methodologies used for identifying, collecting, and reporting AEs. This lack of a prospective, standardized AE collection method is a shortcoming in the ... ...

    Abstract Object: Adverse event (AE) rates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) are variable, due to various methodologies used for identifying, collecting, and reporting AEs. This lack of a prospective, standardized AE collection method is a shortcoming in the advancement of DBS. In this paper the authors disclose the standardized and prospectively recorded AE data from their institution, correlated with clinical outcome and quality of life (QOL) measures.
    Methods: All patients who underwent operations at the authors' institution for Parkinson disease (PD), essential tremor, dystonia, other tremor, and obsessive-compulsive disorder were included. Complications occurring intraoperatively or within the first 180 days following surgery were recorded, analyzed, and classified as mild, moderate, or severe, regardless of their perceived relationship to the procedure. The presence, frequency, and severity of AEs were compared with the following outcome measurements: postoperative change in the QOL scales (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Survey, 39-Item PD Questionnaire); motor scales (Tremor Rating Scale, Unified Dystonia Rating Scale, Unified PD Rating Scale); and Patient Global Impression Scale (PGIS).
    Results: Two hundred seventy DBS procedures were performed in 198 patients. Three hundred AEs were recorded in 146 (54.1%) of the 270 procedures, and the AEs were recorded in 119 (60.1%) of 198 patients. Of the 198 patients, the maximum severity of AEs was mild in 28 (14.1%), moderate in 35 (17.7%), and severe in 56 (28.3%). Of the 300 AEs, 102 (34.1%) of 299 were mild, 106 (35.5%) were moderate, and 91 (30.4%) were severe. The AEs were classified as probably not stimulation induced in 10 (3.4%) of 297, probably in 44 (14.9%), unclear for 89 (30%), and not applicable to stimulation in 154 (51.9%). Adverse events were also classified as probably related to surgery in 111 (37.2%) of 298, possibly related in 96 (32.2%), and probably not related to surgery in 91 (30.5%). There was no significant difference (p = 0.22) in QOL outcomes among patients who had no AEs compared with those who experienced mild, moderate, or severe AEs. There was no significant difference in QOL outcomes between patients who did not experience an AE compared with those who experienced any AE. There was no significant difference in the mean General PGIS score between patients without an AE versus those with any AE, as well as on the Symptom-Specific PGIS. Motor function outcomes did not vary between patients with or without AEs. For patients with PD with or without AEs, there was no significant difference in preoperative off-medicine Unified PD Rating Scale score and postoperative 6-month on-medication/on-stimulation change scores (p = 0.59). For patients with tremor there were no differences between those with or without AEs on the Tremor Rating Scale for motor function or activities of daily living. Patients with dystonia with and without AEs showed no differences in the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale.
    Conclusions: Prospectively and systematically recording AEs may result in higher AE rates, but this does not correlate with poorer QOL, motor function, or patient-oriented outcome scores.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Data Collection/standards ; Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects ; Deep Brain Stimulation/methods ; Dystonia/therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Movement Disorders/therapy ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Parkinson Disease/therapy ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Stereotaxic Techniques/statistics & numerical data ; Treatment Outcome ; Tremor/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2026589-X
    ISSN 1092-0684 ; 1092-0684
    ISSN (online) 1092-0684
    ISSN 1092-0684
    DOI 10.3171/2010.4.FOCUS10100
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Do patient's get angrier following STN, GPi, and thalamic deep brain stimulation.

    Burdick, Adam P / Foote, Kelly D / Wu, Samuel / Bowers, Dawn / Zeilman, Pam / Jacobson, Charles E / Ward, Herbert E / Okun, Michael S

    NeuroImage

    2010  Volume 54 Suppl 1, Page(s) S227–32

    Abstract: Objective: The objective of the study was to examine whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the globus pallidus internus (GPi), and/or the ventralis intermedius thalamic nucleus (Vim) was associated with making patients ... ...

    Abstract Objective: The objective of the study was to examine whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the globus pallidus internus (GPi), and/or the ventralis intermedius thalamic nucleus (Vim) was associated with making patients angrier pre to post-surgical intervention.
    Background: Secondary outcome analysis of the NIH COMPARE Parkinson's Disease DBS trial revealed that participants were angrier and had more mood and cognitive side effects following DBS. Additionally blinded on/off analysis did not change anger scores. The sample size was small but suggested that STN DBS may have been worse than GPi in provoking anger. We endeavored to examine this question utilizing a larger dataset (the UF INFORM database), and also we included a third surgical target (Vim), which has been utilized for a different disease, essential tremor.
    Methods: Consecutive patients from the University of Florida Movement Disorders Center who were implanted with unilateral DBS for Parkinson's disease (STN or GPi) or essential tremor (Vim) were included. Patients originally implanted at outside institutions were excluded. Pre-operative and 4- to 6-month post-operative Visual Analog Mood Scale (VAMS) scores for all three groups were compared; additionally, pre-operative and 1- to 3-month scores were compared for STN and GPi patients. A linear regression model was utilized to analyze the relationship between the VAMS anger score and the independent variables of age, years with symptoms, Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score, handedness, ethnicity, gender, side of surgery, target of surgery, baseline Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) total score, baseline Beck Depression Index (BDI) score, micro- and macroelectrode passes, and years of education. Levodopa equivalent dosages and dopamine agonist use were analyzed for a potential impact on anger scores.
    Results: A total of 322 unilateral DBS procedures were analyzed, with STN (n=195), Vim (n=71), and GPi (n=56) making up the cohort. An ANOVA was used to detect significant differences among the three targets in the changes pre- to post-operatively. Similar to the COMPARE dataset, at 4 months, the only subscore of VAMS to reveal a significant difference between the three targets was the angry subscore, with GPi revealing a mean (standard) change of 2.38 (9.53); STN, 4.82 (14.52); and Vim, -1.17 (11.51) (p=0.012). At 1-3 months post-operation, both STN and GPi groups were significantly angrier (p=0.004), but there was no significant difference between the two groups. However, GPi patients were significantly more confused as compared to STN patients (p=0.016). The linear regression model which sought independent explanatory variables revealed a relationship between the VAMS anger score and the surgical target and the disease duration. The mean changes for STN and GPi DBS pre- to post-operation were 11.67 (p=0.001) and 8.21 (p=0.022) units more than those with Vim, respectively. For every year added of disease duration, the VAMS anger score increased by 0.24 (p=0.022). For the GPi and STN groups, number of microelectrode passes was significantly associated with angry score changes (p=0.014), with the anger score increasing 2.29 units per microelectrode pass. Independent variables not associated with the VAMS anger score included the surgery side, handedness, gender, ethnicity, education, age at surgery, MMSE, DRS, and BDI scores. Although the STN group significantly decreased in LED when compared to GPi, there was no relationship to anger scores. Similarly, dopamine agonist use was not different between STN and GPi groups and did not correlate with the VAMS anger score changes.
    Conclusions: STN and GPi DBS for Parkinson's disease were associated with significantly higher anger scores pre- to post-DBS as compared to Vim for essential tremor. Anger score changes in STN and GPi patients seem to be associated with microelectrode passes, suggesting that it may be a lesional effect. PD patients with longer disease duration may be particularly susceptible, and this should be kept in mind when discussing the potential of DBS surgery for an individual patient. Essential tremor patients who on average have much longer disease durations did not get angrier. The changes in anger scores were not related to LED change or dopamine agonist use. Whether the induction of anger is disease-specific or target-specific is not currently known; however, our data would suggest that PD patients implanted in STN or GPi are at a potential risk. Finally, on closer inspection of the COMPARE DBS data, VAMS anger scores did not change on or off DBS, suggesting that anger changes may be more of a lesional effect rather than a stimulation induced one (Okun et al., 2009).
    MeSH term(s) Anger ; Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects ; Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology ; Essential Tremor/psychology ; Essential Tremor/therapy ; Globus Pallidus/physiopathology ; Humans ; Parkinson Disease/psychology ; Parkinson Disease/therapy ; Subthalamic Nucleus/physiopathology ; Ventral Thalamic Nuclei/physiopathology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-10-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1147767-2
    ISSN 1095-9572 ; 1053-8119
    ISSN (online) 1095-9572
    ISSN 1053-8119
    DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.077
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Identification and management of deep brain stimulation intra- and postoperative urgencies and emergencies.

    Morishita, Takashi / Foote, Kelly D / Burdick, Adam P / Katayama, Yoichi / Yamamoto, Takamitsu / Frucht, Steven J / Okun, Michael S

    Parkinsonism & related disorders

    2009  Volume 16, Issue 3, Page(s) 153–162

    Abstract: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been increasingly utilized for the therapeutic treatment of movement disorders, and with the advent of this therapy more postoperative urgencies and emergencies have emerged. In this paper, we will review, identify, and ... ...

    Abstract Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been increasingly utilized for the therapeutic treatment of movement disorders, and with the advent of this therapy more postoperative urgencies and emergencies have emerged. In this paper, we will review, identify, and suggest management strategies for both intra- and postoperative urgencies and emergencies. We have separated the scenarios into 1--surgery/procedure related, 2--hardware related, 3--stimulation-induced difficulties, and 4--others. We have included ten illustrative (and actual) case vignettes to augment the discussion of each issue.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Child ; Cognition Disorders/etiology ; Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects ; Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation ; Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods ; Emergency Medical Services ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Movement Disorders/therapy ; Postoperative Complications/physiopathology ; Postoperative Complications/therapy ; PubMed/statistics & numerical data
    Language English
    Publishing date 2009-11-05
    Publishing country England
    Document type Case Reports ; Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1311489-x
    ISSN 1873-5126 ; 1353-8020
    ISSN (online) 1873-5126
    ISSN 1353-8020
    DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.10.003
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Prevalence of Twiddler's syndrome as a cause of deep brain stimulation hardware failure.

    Burdick, Adam P / Okun, Michael S / Haq, Ihtsham U / Ward, Herbert E / Bova, Frank / Jacobson, Charles E / Bowers, Dawn / Zeilman, Pam / Foote, Kelly D

    Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery

    2010  Volume 88, Issue 6, Page(s) 353–359

    Abstract: We reviewed our deep brain stimulation patient database to describe hardware complications which resulted from implantable pulse generator mobility, a phenomenon referred to as Twiddler's syndrome. A prospectively collected database of adverse events for ...

    Abstract We reviewed our deep brain stimulation patient database to describe hardware complications which resulted from implantable pulse generator mobility, a phenomenon referred to as Twiddler's syndrome. A prospectively collected database of adverse events for all patients operated on at the University of Florida was queried searching for hardware malfunctions. Of 362 total leads implanted in 226 patients since 2002, there were 17 hardware malfunctions. Three of them were due to Twiddler's syndrome, representing 1.3% of patients (3 of 226 patients) and 1.4% of leads (5 of 362 leads). The subjects had characteristic presentations including re-emergence of symptoms, pain along the path of the hardware, abnormal impedances/current drain and radiographic signs of twisting/fracture. In all cases securing the implantable pulse generator within the chest pocket resolved the issue. Twiddler's syndrome in the population of movement disorder patients treated with deep brain stimulation is an uncommon but important adverse event. It possesses a characteristic presentation and with appropriate diagnostic evaluation it is treatable and future occurrences are preventable.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Databases, Factual ; Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects ; Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications/diagnosis ; Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Intraoperative Complications/etiology ; Movement Disorders/diagnosis ; Movement Disorders/epidemiology ; Movement Disorders/etiology ; Prevalence ; Prospective Studies ; Syndrome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Case Reports ; Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 645069-6
    ISSN 1423-0372 ; 1011-6125
    ISSN (online) 1423-0372
    ISSN 1011-6125
    DOI 10.1159/000319039
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Prevalence of Twiddler’s Syndrome as a Cause of Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware Failure

    Burdick, Adam P. / Okun, Michael S. / Haq, Ihtsham U. / Ward, Herbert E. / Bova, Frank / Jacobson, Charles E. / Bowers, Dawn / Zeilman, Pam / Foote, Kelly D.

    Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

    2010  Volume 88, Issue 6, Page(s) 353–359

    Abstract: We reviewed our deep brain stimulation patient database to describe hardware complications which resulted from implantable pulse generator mobility, a phenomenon referred to as twiddler’s syndrome. A prospectively collected database of adverse events for ...

    Institution Departments of Neurosurgery Neurology Psychiatry and Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla., and Wake Forest University Department of Neurology, Winston Salem, N.C., USA
    Abstract We reviewed our deep brain stimulation patient database to describe hardware complications which resulted from implantable pulse generator mobility, a phenomenon referred to as twiddler’s syndrome. A prospectively collected database of adverse events for all patients operated on at the University of Florida was queried searching for hardware malfunctions. Of 362 total leads implanted in 226 patients since 2002, there were 17 hardware malfunctions. Three of them were due to twiddler’s syndrome, representing 1.3% of patients (3 of 226 patients) and 1.4% of leads (5 of 362 leads). The subjects had characteristic presentations including re-emergence of symptoms, pain along the path of the hardware, abnormal impedances/current drain and radiographic signs of twisting/fracture. In all cases securing the implantable pulse generator within the chest pocket resolved the issue. Twiddler’s syndrome in the population of movement disorder patients treated with deep brain stimulation is an uncommon but important adverse event. It possesses a characteristic presentation and with appropriate diagnostic evaluation it is treatable and future occurrences are preventable.
    Keywords Twiddler’s syndrome, complication ; Deep brain stimulation ; Adverse event
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-09-22
    Publisher S. Karger AG
    Publishing place Basel, Switzerland
    Document type Article
    Note Clinical Study
    ZDB-ID 645069-6
    ISSN 1423-0372 ; 1011-6125
    ISSN (online) 1423-0372
    ISSN 1011-6125
    DOI 10.1159/000319039
    Database Karger publisher's database

    More links

    Kategorien

To top