Article ; Online: Community Pharmacists' Views and Experiences with ADR Reporting for Complementary Medicines: A Qualitative Study in New Zealand.
2020 Volume 43, Issue 11, Page(s) 1157–1170
Abstract: Introduction: Detecting signals of safety concerns associated with complementary medicines (CMs) relies on spontaneous reports submitted by health professionals and patients/consumers. Community pharmacists are well placed to identify and report ... ...
Abstract | Introduction: Detecting signals of safety concerns associated with complementary medicines (CMs) relies on spontaneous reports submitted by health professionals and patients/consumers. Community pharmacists are well placed to identify and report suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with CMs, but pharmacists submit few CMs ADR reports. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore New Zealand community pharmacists' views and experiences with ADR reporting for CMs. Methods: Qualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 27 practising community pharmacists identified through purposive and convenience sampling. Data were analysed using a general inductive approach. Results: Participants were familiar with systems for reporting ADRs, believed ADR reporting for CMs important, and that pharmacists should contribute. However, few submitted reports of CMs ADRs and none encouraged patients/consumers to do so. Participants explained this was because they had never been informed by patients about ADRs associated with CMs. Participants said they would report serious ADRs; time pressures, lack of certainty around causality, lack of awareness of mechanisms for reporting CMs ADRs, and lack of remuneration were deterrents to reporting. Participants were aware of intensive-monitoring studies for prescription medicines, understood the rationale for considering this approach for CMs and recognised there would be potential practical difficulties. Conclusions: Participants used their knowledge of CMs safety concerns to minimise risk of harms to consumers from CMs use, but most had a passive approach to identifying and reporting ADRs for CMs. There is substantial potential for pharmacists to adopt proactive strategies in pharmacovigilance for CMs, particularly in recognising and reporting ADRs, and empowering CMs users to do the same. |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Adult ; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/standards ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological Products ; Community Pharmacy Services ; Complementary Therapies/adverse effects ; Data Collection ; Drug Interactions ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New Zealand ; Pharmacists ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult |
Chemical Substances | Biological Products |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2020-12-17 |
Publishing country | New Zealand |
Document type | Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
ZDB-ID | 1018059-x |
ISSN | 1179-1942 ; 0114-5916 |
ISSN (online) | 1179-1942 |
ISSN | 0114-5916 |
DOI | 10.1007/s40264-020-00980-x |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
Full text online
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
Zs.A 2127: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.