LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Summary goodness-of-fit statistics for binary generalized linear models with noncanonical link functions.

Canary, Jana D / Blizzard, Leigh / Barry, Ronald P / Hosmer, David W / Quinn, Stephen J

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift

2015  Volume 58, Issue 3, Page(s) 674–690

Abstract: Generalized linear models (GLM) with a canonical logit link function are the primary modeling technique used to relate a binary outcome to predictor variables. However, noncanonical links can offer more flexibility, producing convenient analytical ... ...

Abstract Generalized linear models (GLM) with a canonical logit link function are the primary modeling technique used to relate a binary outcome to predictor variables. However, noncanonical links can offer more flexibility, producing convenient analytical quantities (e.g., probit GLMs in toxicology) and desired measures of effect (e.g., relative risk from log GLMs). Many summary goodness-of-fit (GOF) statistics exist for logistic GLM. Their properties make the development of GOF statistics relatively straightforward, but it can be more difficult under noncanonical links. Although GOF tests for logistic GLM with continuous covariates (GLMCC) have been applied to GLMCCs with log links, we know of no GOF tests in the literature specifically developed for GLMCCs that can be applied regardless of link function chosen. We generalize the Tsiatis GOF statistic originally developed for logistic GLMCCs, (TG), so that it can be applied under any link function. Further, we show that the algebraically related Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) and Pigeon-Heyse (J(2) ) statistics can be applied directly. In a simulation study, TG, HL, and J(2) were used to evaluate the fit of probit, log-log, complementary log-log, and log models, all calculated with a common grouping method. The TG statistic consistently maintained Type I error rates, while those of HL and J(2) were often lower than expected if terms with little influence were included. Generally, the statistics had similar power to detect an incorrect model. An exception occurred when a log GLMCC was incorrectly fit to data generated from a logistic GLMCC. In this case, TG had more power than HL or J(2) .
MeSH term(s) Biometry/methods ; Computer Simulation ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Models, Statistical
Language English
Publishing date 2015-11-19
Publishing country Germany
Document type Journal Article
ZDB-ID 131640-0
ISSN 1521-4036 ; 0323-3847 ; 0006-3452
ISSN (online) 1521-4036
ISSN 0323-3847 ; 0006-3452
DOI 10.1002/bimj.201400079
Shelf mark
Z 1267: Show issues
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top