Article ; Online: The impact of surgeon operative volume on risk of reoperation within 5 years of mid-urethral sling: a systematic review.
International urogynecology journal
2022 Volume 34, Issue 5, Page(s) 981–992
Abstract: Introduction and hypothesis: Undesired outcomes after mid-urethral sling (MUS), such as mesh exposure or surgical failure, can necessitate further procedures. The objective of this review is to evaluate the association between surgeon operative volume ... ...
| Abstract | Introduction and hypothesis: Undesired outcomes after mid-urethral sling (MUS), such as mesh exposure or surgical failure, can necessitate further procedures. The objective of this review is to evaluate the association between surgeon operative volume and the risk of reoperation after MUS. Methods: Eligible studies were selected through an electronic literature search from database and references of the studies included. Databases were searched for original studies reporting on the MUS procedure, reoperation, and operative volume. Random effects models were used to estimate the pooled OR of reoperation according to surgeon volume. Outcomes were divided into two categories: mesh removal and/or revision and subsequent surgery for treatment of SUI. Results: A total of 2,304 abstracts were screened, and 51 studies were assessed through full-text reading. Seven studies were included in the systematic review. High-volume and low-volume surgeons were defined differently in various studies. The odds ratio of the mesh removal/revision procedure was 1.26 (95%CI 1.03-1.53) among those who received their surgery from a low-volume surgeon compared with those who received their surgery from a high-volume surgeon as defined by the studies. The odds ratio of repeated incontinence procedures was 1.18 (95% CI 1.01-1.37). Conclusions: The odds of a repeat incontinence procedure appear higher if the surgery is performed by a low-volume surgeon, although these results need to be interpreted with caution as the definition of low-volume vs high-volume surgeon varied between studies. As such, operative volume should be included in surgical reporting, and future research should utilize surgical volume as either a continuous exposure or a standardized value of low- vs high-volume MUS surgeons. |
|---|---|
| MeSH term(s) | Humans ; Reoperation ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery ; Suburethral Slings/adverse effects ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods ; Urinary Incontinence/surgery ; Surgeons ; Retrospective Studies |
| Language | English |
| Publishing date | 2022-12-20 |
| Publishing country | England |
| Document type | Systematic Review ; Journal Article ; Review |
| ZDB-ID | 1050631-7 |
| ISSN | 1433-3023 ; 0937-3462 |
| ISSN (online) | 1433-3023 |
| ISSN | 0937-3462 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-022-05426-9 |
| Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
Full text online
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
| Zs.A 3070: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.