LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 13

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Survival of patients with kidney failure awaiting transplantation stratified by age and ethnicity: population-based cohort analysis.

    Chaudhry, Daoud / Evison, Felicity / Sharif, Adnan

    The British journal of surgery

    2024  Volume 111, Issue 1

    Abstract: Background: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for people living with kidney failure who are suitable for surgery, but survival benefits for older and/or ethnic minority candidates are unclear. To inform decision-making, the survival of ... ...

    Abstract Background: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for people living with kidney failure who are suitable for surgery, but survival benefits for older and/or ethnic minority candidates are unclear. To inform decision-making, the survival of patients on a waiting list for kidney transplantation was assessed.
    Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken of registry data for patients with kidney failure listed for transplantation in the UK. From 1 January 2000 until 30 September 2019, all patients listed for a first kidney-alone transplant were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. After testing for violations of the proportional hazards assumption, an extended Cox regression model factoring in transplantation as a time-dependent variable according to the intention-to-treat principle was developed.
    Results: The study cohort included 47 917 patients on a waiting list for kidney transplantation, of whom 34 558 (72.1%) subsequently received a transplant. Transplantation compared with remaining on dialysis was associated with an overall survival benefit (HR 0.17, 95% c.i. 0.16 to 0.18; P < 0.001), occurring immediately within 30 days, and observed regardless of ethnicity. For White kidney transplant candidates aged at least 65 or at least 70 years, a significant survival benefit was observed within 6 months (HR 0.49, 0.29 to 0.82) and 1 year (HR 0.45, 0.25 to 0.79) after transplantation respectively, which contrasted with 3 years after kidney transplantation for candidates from ethnic minorities aged at least 65 years (HR 0.53, 0.36 to 0.78) or at least 70 years (HR 0.53, 0.36 to 0.78).
    Conclusion: Although time-to-survival benefits are stratified by age and ethnicity, all kidney transplant candidates on the waiting list are better off with transplantation compared with remaining on dialysis. The absence of any early postoperative mortality suggests that some high-risk patients with kidney failure may not be receiving transplantation opportunities.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Ethnicity ; Retrospective Studies ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery ; Minority Groups ; Cohort Studies ; Waiting Lists ; Survival Analysis
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-30
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2985-3
    ISSN 1365-2168 ; 0263-1202 ; 0007-1323 ; 1355-7688
    ISSN (online) 1365-2168
    ISSN 0263-1202 ; 0007-1323 ; 1355-7688
    DOI 10.1093/bjs/znae001
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Survival Advantage Comparing Older Living Donor Versus Standard Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants.

    Patel, Kamlesh / Brotherton, Anna / Chaudhry, Daoud / Evison, Felicity / Nieto, Thomas / Dabare, Dilan / Sharif, Adnan

    Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation

    2024  Volume 37, Page(s) 12559

    Abstract: The aim of this analysis was to explore mortality outcomes for kidney transplant candidates receiving older living donor kidneys (age ≥60 years) versus younger deceased donors or remaining on dialysis. From 2000 to 2019, all patients on dialysis listed ... ...

    Abstract The aim of this analysis was to explore mortality outcomes for kidney transplant candidates receiving older living donor kidneys (age ≥60 years) versus younger deceased donors or remaining on dialysis. From 2000 to 2019, all patients on dialysis listed for their first kidney-alone transplant were included in a retrospective cohort analysis of UK transplant registry data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with survival analysis conducted by intention-to-treat principle. Time-to-death from listing was modelled using nonproportional hazard Cox regression models with transplantation handled as a time-dependent covariate. A total of 32,978 waitlisted kidney failure patients formed the primary study cohort, of whom 18,796 (58.5%) received a kidney transplant (1,557 older living donor kidneys and 18,062 standard criteria donor kidneys). Older living donor kidney transplantation constituted only 17.0% of all living donor kidney transplant activity (overall cohort;
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Middle Aged ; Living Donors ; Kidney Transplantation ; Retrospective Studies ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; Tissue Donors ; Kidney ; Graft Survival
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-11
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 639435-8
    ISSN 1432-2277 ; 0934-0874
    ISSN (online) 1432-2277
    ISSN 0934-0874
    DOI 10.3389/ti.2024.12559
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Survival for waitlisted kidney failure patients receiving transplantation versus remaining on waiting list: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Chaudhry, Daoud / Chaudhry, Abdullah / Peracha, Javeria / Sharif, Adnan

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

    2022  Volume 376, Page(s) e068769

    Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the survival benefit of transplantation versus dialysis for waitlisted kidney failure patients with a priori stratification.: Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.: Data sources: Online databases MEDLINE, Ovid ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: To investigate the survival benefit of transplantation versus dialysis for waitlisted kidney failure patients with a priori stratification.
    Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Data sources: Online databases MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched between database inception and 1 March 2021.
    Inclusion criteria: All comparative studies that assessed all cause mortality for transplantation versus dialysis in patients with kidney failure waitlisted for transplant surgery were included. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was done using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model, with heterogeneity investigated by subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression.
    Results: The search identified 48 observational studies with no randomised controlled trials (n=1 245 850 patients). In total, 92% (n=44/48) of studies reported a long term (at least one year) survival benefit associated with transplantation compared with dialysis. However, 11 of those studies identified stratums in which transplantation offered no statistically significant benefit over remaining on dialysis. In 18 studies suitable for meta-analysis, kidney transplantation showed a survival benefit (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.54; P<0.001), with significant heterogeneity even after subgroup/sensitivity analyses or meta-regression analysis.
    Conclusion: Kidney transplantation remains the superior treatment modality for most patients with kidney failure to reduce all cause mortality, but some subgroups may lack a survival benefit. Given the continued scarcity of donor organs, further evidence is needed to better inform decision making for patients with kidney failure.
    Study registration: PROSPERO CRD42021247247.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/psychology ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy ; Kidney Transplantation ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Renal Dialysis ; Survival Analysis ; Waiting Lists
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-03-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 1362901-3
    ISSN 1756-1833 ; 0959-8154 ; 0959-8146 ; 0959-8138 ; 0959-535X ; 1759-2151
    ISSN (online) 1756-1833
    ISSN 0959-8154 ; 0959-8146 ; 0959-8138 ; 0959-535X ; 1759-2151
    DOI 10.1136/bmj-2021-068769
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: All Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys are Equal But are Some More Equal Than Others? A Population-Cohort Analysis of UK Transplant Registry Data.

    Patel, Kamlesh / Brotherton, Anna / Chaudhry, Daoud / Evison, Felicity / Nieto, Thomas / Dabare, Dilan / Sharif, Adnan

    Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation

    2023  Volume 36, Page(s) 11421

    Abstract: Survival outcomes for kidney transplant candidates based on expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney type is unknown. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected registry data of all waitlisted kidney failure patients receiving ... ...

    Abstract Survival outcomes for kidney transplant candidates based on expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney type is unknown. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected registry data of all waitlisted kidney failure patients receiving dialysis in the United Kingdom. All patients listed for their first kidney-alone transplant between 2000-2019 were included. Treatment types included; living donor; standard criteria donor (SCD); ECD
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Routinely Collected Health Data ; Living Donors ; Kidney ; Renal Insufficiency ; United Kingdom
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-04
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 639435-8
    ISSN 1432-2277 ; 0934-0874
    ISSN (online) 1432-2277
    ISSN 0934-0874
    DOI 10.3389/ti.2023.11421
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Outcomes of cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome: a systematic review.

    Cornwall, Hannah Louisa / Lam, Chon Meng / Chaudhry, Daoud / Muzaffar, Jameel / Monksfield, Peter / Bance, Manohar L

    European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

    2023  Volume 281, Issue 3, Page(s) 1115–1129

    Abstract: Purpose: This study is a systematic review of the literature which seeks to evaluate auditory and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Usher syndrome.: Methods: Systematic review of studies indexed in Medline via ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: This study is a systematic review of the literature which seeks to evaluate auditory and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Usher syndrome.
    Methods: Systematic review of studies indexed in Medline via PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov was performed up to March 9th 2022, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Patient demographics, comorbidity, details of cochlear implantation, auditory, and QOL outcomes were extracted and summarized.
    Results: 33 studies reported over 217 cochlear implants in 187 patients with Usher syndrome, comprising subtypes 1 (56 patients), 2 (9 patients), 3 (23 patients), and not specified (99 patients). Auditory outcomes included improved sound detection, speech perception, and speech intelligibility. QOL outcomes were reported for 75 patients, with benefit reported in the majority.
    Conclusions: Many patients with Usher syndrome develop improved auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation with early implantation being an important factor.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Cochlear Implantation ; Usher Syndromes/surgery ; Quality of Life ; Treatment Outcome ; Cochlear Implants ; Speech Perception
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-11-06
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Systematic Review ; Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1017359-6
    ISSN 1434-4726 ; 0937-4477
    ISSN (online) 1434-4726
    ISSN 0937-4477
    DOI 10.1007/s00405-023-08304-2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Interprofessional Education: Saudi Health Students' Attitudes Toward Shared Learning [Letter].

    Chaudhry, Daoud / Mohammad, Fahad / Chaudhry, Abdullah

    Advances in medical education and practice

    2020  Volume 11, Page(s) 107–108

    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-01-31
    Publishing country New Zealand
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2578539-4
    ISSN 1179-7258
    ISSN 1179-7258
    DOI 10.2147/AMEP.S245644
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Delays in Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis (DIMES): protocol for a multicentre, observational study of multiple sclerosis diagnostic pathways in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.

    Kuri, Ashvin / Henshall, David E / Chaudhry, Daoud / Ooi, Setthasorn Zhi Yang / Zhang, Qiqi / Mathews, Joela / Thomson, Alison / Rog, David / Hobart, Jeremy / Dobson, Ruth

    BMC neurology

    2024  Volume 24, Issue 1, Page(s) 105

    Abstract: Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a leading cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults. Accumulating evidence indicates early diagnosis and early treatment improves long-term outcomes. However, the MS diagnostic pathway is increasingly ... ...

    Abstract Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a leading cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults. Accumulating evidence indicates early diagnosis and early treatment improves long-term outcomes. However, the MS diagnostic pathway is increasingly complex, and delays may occur at several stages. Factors causing delays remain understudied. We aim to quantify the time taken for MS to be diagnosed, and characterise the diagnostic pathway and initial care provided, in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI).
    Methods: Delays In MultiplE Sclerosis diagnosis (DIMES) in the UK and ROI is a multicentre, observational, retrospective study that will be conducted via the Neurology and Neurosurgery Interest Group (NANSIG) collaborative network. Any hospital in the UK and ROI providing an MS diagnostic service is eligible to participate. Data on consecutive individuals newly diagnosed with MS between 1st July 2022 and 31st December 2022 will be collected. The primary outcomes are 1) time from symptoms/signs prompting referral to neurology, to MS diagnosis; and 2) time from referral to neurology for suspected MS, to MS diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include: MS symptoms, referring specialties, investigations performed, neurology appointments, functional status, use of disease modifying treatments, and support at diagnosis including physical activity, and follow up. Demographic characteristics of people newly diagnosed with MS will be summarised, adherence to quality standards summarised as percentages, and time-to-event variables presented with survival curves. Multivariable models will be used to investigate the association of demographic and clinical factors with time to MS diagnosis, as defined in our primary outcomes.
    Discussion: DIMES aims to be the largest multicentre study of the MS diagnostic pathway in the UK and ROI. The proposed data collection provides insights that cannot be provided from contemporary registries, and the findings will inform approaches to MS services nationally in the future.
    MeSH term(s) Young Adult ; Humans ; Multiple Sclerosis/diagnosis ; Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology ; Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Ireland/epidemiology ; United Kingdom/epidemiology ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Multicenter Studies as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-28
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2041347-6
    ISSN 1471-2377 ; 1471-2377
    ISSN (online) 1471-2377
    ISSN 1471-2377
    DOI 10.1186/s12883-024-03598-z
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Post Synaptic Auditory Neuropathies: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

    Chaudhry, Daoud / Chaudhry, Abdullah / Muzaffar, Jameel / Monksfield, Peter / Bance, Manohar

    The journal of international advanced otology

    2020  Volume 16, Issue 3, Page(s) 411–431

    Abstract: To establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with postsynaptic auditory neuropathy (AN). Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ... ...

    Abstract To establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with postsynaptic auditory neuropathy (AN). Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits placed on language or year of publication. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 98 studies in total, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 25 patients with at least 28 CIs. Of these, 4 studies focused on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), 3 on Brown-Vialetto-Van-Laere syndrome (BVVL), 2 on Friedreich Ataxia (FRDA), 2 on Syndromic dominant optic atrophy (DOA+), 2 on Cerebellar ataxia - areflexia - pes cavus - optic atrophy - sensorineural hearing loss (CAPOS) syndrome, and 1 on Deafness-dystonia-optic neuronopathy (DDON) syndrome. All studies were Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) grade IV. Overall trend was towards good post-CI outcomes with 22 of the total 25 patients displaying modest to significant benefit. Hearing outcomes following CI in postsynaptic ANs are variable but generally good with patients showing improvements in hearing thresholds and speech perception. In the future, development of a clearer stratification system into pre, post, and central AN would have clinical and academic benefits. Further research is required to understand AN pathophysiology and develop better diagnostic tools for more accurate identification of lesion sites. Multicenter longitudinal studies with standardized comprehensive outcome measures including health-related quality of life data will be key in establishing a better understanding of short and long-term post-CI outcomes.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Female ; Hearing Loss, Central ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; Humans ; Male ; Membrane Transport Proteins ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Sodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPase ; Speech Perception
    Chemical Substances ATP1A3 protein, human ; Membrane Transport Proteins ; SLC52A3 protein, human ; Sodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPase (EC 7.2.2.13)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-12
    Publishing country Turkey
    Document type Journal Article ; Systematic Review
    ISSN 2148-3817
    ISSN (online) 2148-3817
    DOI 10.5152/iao.2020.9035
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Superficial Siderosis: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

    Chaudhry, Abdullah / Chaudhry, Daoud / Muzaffar, Jameel / Crundwell, Gemma / Monksfield, Peter / Bance, Manohar

    The journal of international advanced otology

    2020  Volume 16, Issue 3, Page(s) 443–455

    Abstract: This study aimed to establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with superficial siderosis (SS). MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for this systematic review. No limits were ... ...

    Abstract This study aimed to establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with superficial siderosis (SS). MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for this systematic review. No limits were placed on the language or the year of publication. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Of a total of 46 studies, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 38 patients. Of the 44 implants, 23 implants (52.27%) had good hearing outcomes at the last follow-up, 9 (20.45%) were initially beneficial for the patient, but then the performance deteriorated (4 of which were re-implanted), and 12 (27.27%) were not beneficial for the patient. All studies were classified as grade 4 studies using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system, being retrospective in nature and consisting of case reports and noncontrolled case series with a small number of patients. Of the 44 implants, 32 (72.73%) showed improved hearing outcomes following CI for SS at some point in time, of which 23 (52.2%) implants showed sustained benefit at the last follow-up (average follow-up time was 21.97 months). It is difficult to predict the longevity of benefit owing to the progressive nature of the disease or the patients in whom it may be beneficial, as the preoperative investigations inadequately predict benefit. Preimplantation and postimplantation counseling with the patient and their family regarding the potential limited benefit and eventual parallel decline with the neurological disease are crucial, along with thorough clinical investigations.
    MeSH term(s) Cochlear Implantation ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Siderosis/surgery
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-12
    Publishing country Turkey
    Document type Journal Article ; Systematic Review
    ISSN 2148-3817
    ISSN (online) 2148-3817
    DOI 10.5152/iao.2020.9037
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Cochlear Implantation in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

    Mathew, Rajeev / Bryan, James / Chaudhry, Daoud / Chaudhry, Abdullah / Kuhn, Isla / Tysome, James / Donnelly, Neil / Axon, Patrick / Bance, Manohar

    Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology

    2021  Volume 43, Issue 1, Page(s) e1–e13

    Abstract: Objective: To determine outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).: Databases reviewed: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrial.gov.: Methods: The review was ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To determine outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
    Databases reviewed: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrial.gov.
    Methods: The review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Primary outcomes measures were changes in speech perception and speech production scores. Secondary outcome measures included communication mode, device use, parental recommendation of implant, postoperative hyperacusis, and quality of life measures. Pooled analysis of outcomes was performed if possible.
    Results: Twenty-four studies reported on 159 children with ASD. There were improvements in speech perception in 78% of cases and in speech expression in 63% of cases, though the extent of this improvement was variable. Seventy-four percent of children with ASD and CI are nonoral communicators. Intermittent/nonuse rate was 31%. Hearing outcomes are worse compared to children with other disabilities. The vast majority of parents would recommend CI based on their experiences.
    Conclusion: Outcome in children with ASD and CI are highly variable and significantly poorer compared to non-ASD children. Despite this, most parents report positive experiences and the evidence supports the use of CI in children with ASD.
    MeSH term(s) Autism Spectrum Disorder/complications ; Child ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Humans ; Parents ; Quality of Life ; Speech Perception
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-11-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2036790-9
    ISSN 1537-4505 ; 1531-7129
    ISSN (online) 1537-4505
    ISSN 1531-7129
    DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003353
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top