LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Evaluation of volumetric measurements in patients with acute type B aortic dissection--thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) vs conservative.

    Chemelli-Steingruber, Iris Eva / Chemelli, Andreas / Strasak, Alexander / Hugl, Beate / Hiemetzberger, Renate / Czermak, Benedikt V

    Journal of vascular surgery

    2009  Volume 49, Issue 1, Page(s) 20–28

    Abstract: Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate aortic volume changes in patients with acute type B aortic dissection (TBD), treated either by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or conservatively.: Materials and methods: From ... ...

    Abstract Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate aortic volume changes in patients with acute type B aortic dissection (TBD), treated either by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or conservatively.
    Materials and methods: From July 1996 through March 2008, 76 patients presenting with acute TBD were referred to our department. To ensure a follow-up of at least 24 months, only 64 of them were included in the present study, with the cut-off for inclusion being March 2006. Twenty-nine of these patients underwent TEVAR and 35 patients underwent conservative treatment. Indications for TEVAR were life-threatening symptoms. Follow-up was performed postinterventionally in patients after TEVAR and at 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter in both groups. It included clinical examinations, computed tomography (CT) scans, analysis of volume changes in true thoracic lumen (TTL), false thoracic lumen (FTL), thoracic lumen (TL), abdominal lumen (AL), and aortic diameter measurements. In addition, the extent of thrombosis and its influence on volume changes were assessed.
    Results: Mean follow-up was 41 months after TEVAR and 46 months in the conservatively-treated patients. At 60 months, cumulative rates of freedom from dissection-related death and rupture-free survival were 82.6% and 93.1% in the TEVAR group, respectively. They were 74.9% and 88.5% in the conservatively-treated group, respectively. In the conservatively-treated patients, 3 patients died of late aortic rupture, 4 were converted to open surgery, and 2 to TEVAR. Evaluation of volume changes showed better results in the TEVAR group within 24 months. However, within 60 months the difference between the two groups was no longer relevant. Relating to thrombosis of the FTL, analyses showed slightly better overall results and promotion of thrombus formation after TEVAR. However, at 60 months the results showed a tendency towards approximation between the two groups.
    Conclusion: Our data suggest that TEVAR seems to delay the natural course of the disease but not to stop it.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aneurysm, Dissecting/complications ; Aneurysm, Dissecting/diagnostic imaging ; Aneurysm, Dissecting/mortality ; Aneurysm, Dissecting/surgery ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction ; Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging ; Aorta, Thoracic/surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery ; Aortic Rupture/diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Rupture/etiology ; Aortic Rupture/surgery ; Aortography/methods ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Dilatation, Pathologic ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Retrospective Studies ; Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging ; Thrombosis/etiology ; Thrombosis/surgery ; Time Factors ; Tomography, Spiral Computed ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2009-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 605700-7
    ISSN 1097-6809 ; 0741-5214
    ISSN (online) 1097-6809
    ISSN 0741-5214
    DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.062
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms.

    Chemelli, Andreas / Hugl, Beate / Klocker, Josef / Thauerer, Michael / Strasak, Alexander / Jaschke, Werner / Waldenberger, Peter / Chemelli-Steingruber, Iris Eva

    Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists

    2010  Volume 17, Issue 4, Page(s) 492–503

    Abstract: Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate a 12-year experience with endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IAA).: Methods: From August 1997 through July 2009, 91 patients (81 men; mean age 71 years, range 31-90) underwent endovascular ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate a 12-year experience with endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IAA).
    Methods: From August 1997 through July 2009, 91 patients (81 men; mean age 71 years, range 31-90) underwent endovascular treatment for isolated IAA at our department. Of these, 77 patients received stent-grafts either alone or in combination with coils or an Amplatzer vascular plug (n = 2); 1 patient received a Smart stent combined with coils, and 13 patients were treated with coil embolization only. The aneurysms were classified according to location: type I = common iliac artery (CIA), type II = internal iliac artery (IIA), type III = CIA and IIA, and type IV = external iliac artery with/without CIA and/or IIA involvement.
    Results: Primary technical success was 90.1% for all aneurysm types and 93.6%, 80%, 88.8%, and 93.3% for types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Secondary technical success was 96.7% for all types and 97.8%, 95%, 100%, and 93.3%, respectively, for each type. Clinical success was 93.4% for all types and 97.8%, 85%, 100%, and 86.7%, respectively, by type. Complications in 18 (19.8%) patients included 7 type I endoleaks, 3 type II endoleaks, 2 enlarged aneurysm sacs (incomplete embolization), 5 cases of buttock claudication, and 2 stent-graft thromboses. Two patients were converted to open surgery; 10 underwent secondary interventions. Mortality rates were 1.1% (n = 1) at 30 death days and 23.1% (n = 21) over a mean follow-up of 45.9 months (no aneurysm-related death). Cumulative overall survival was 97.7% at 1 year and 47.6% at 10 years. Freedom from aneurysm-related complications was 88.6% at 1 year and 83.5% at 5 years.
    Conclusion: Endovascular repair of isolated IAA is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to surgery. However, it may be associated with several complications and must, therefore, be carefully planned.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Austria ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality ; Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects ; Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation ; Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality ; Female ; Humans ; Iliac Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging ; Iliac Aneurysm/mortality ; Iliac Aneurysm/surgery ; Iliac Aneurysm/therapy ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Selection ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Stents ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2006618-1
    ISSN 1545-1550 ; 1526-6028
    ISSN (online) 1545-1550
    ISSN 1526-6028
    DOI 10.1583/10-3047.1
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top