LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: A network meta-analysis of 12,116 individuals from randomized controlled trials in the treatment of depression after acute coronary syndrome

Grace En Hui Lim / Ansel Tang / Yip Han Chin / Jie Ning Yong / Darren Tan / Phoebe Tay / Yu Yi Chan / Denzel Ming Wei Lim / Jun Wei Yeo / Kai En Chan / Kamala Devi / Colin Eng Choon Ong / Roger S. Y. Foo / Huay-Cheem Tan / Mark Y. Chan / Roger Ho / Poay Huan Loh / Nicholas W. S. Chew

PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss

2022  Volume 11

Abstract: Background Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) depression is a common but not well understood complication experienced by ACS patients. Research on the effectiveness of various therapies remains limited. Hence, we sought to conduct a network meta-analysis ...

Abstract Background Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) depression is a common but not well understood complication experienced by ACS patients. Research on the effectiveness of various therapies remains limited. Hence, we sought to conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of different interventions for post-ACS depression in improving patient outcomes. Methods and findings Three electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials describing different depression treatment modalities in post-ACS patients. Each article was screened based on inclusion criteria and relevant data were extracted. A bivariate analysis and a network meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. A total of 30 articles were included in our analysis. Compared to standard care, psychosocial therapy was associated with the greatest reduction in depression scores (SMD:-1.21, 95% CI: -1.81 to -0.61, p<0.001), followed by cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (SMD: -0.75, 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.52, p<0.001), antidepressants (SMD: -0.73, 95% CI: -1.14 to -0.31, p<0.001), and lastly, combination therapy (SMD: -0.15, 95% CI: -0.28 to -0.03, p = 0.016). No treatment modalities was found to be more effective in reducing depression scores when compared to one another. Additional analysis showed that these treatment modalities did not have significant impact on the overall mortality, cardiac mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction. Conclusion This network meta-analysis found that the treatment effect of the various psychological modalities on depression severity were similar. Future trials on psychological interventions assessing clinical outcomes and improvement in adherence to ACS-specific interventions are needed.
Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
Language English
Publishing date 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Document type Article ; Online
Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

More links

Kategorien

To top