LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Your last searches

  1. AU="Consuelo Gonzalez-Suarez"
  2. AU="Xie, Zhaoheng"

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Effectiveness of ultrasound guided interfascial hydrodissection with the use of saline anesthetic solution for myofascial pain syndrome of the upper trapezius

Charidy Suarez-Ramos / Consuelo Gonzalez-Suarez / Ivan Neil Gomez / Maria Katherine Gonzalez / Philippe Hubert Co / Jose Alfonso Llamas

Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, Vol

a single blind randomized controlled trial

2023  Volume 4

Abstract: BackgroundMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is described as pain that arise from myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) which is a hyperirritable spot within a taut band of skeletal muscle. A newer needling technique called the interfascial hydrodissection (IH), ...

Abstract BackgroundMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is described as pain that arise from myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) which is a hyperirritable spot within a taut band of skeletal muscle. A newer needling technique called the interfascial hydrodissection (IH), wherein anesthetic saline solution (ASS) is injected between the fascia of the muscles using ultrasound as guide. It is theorized that this technique blocks the nerve branches and improve gliding in between the muscle and fascia.ObjectiveTo determine the short and long-term effects of interfascial hydrodissection using 2% Lidocaine and saline solution compared to dry needling with MPS of the upper trapezius on pain and quality of life using.MethodsThis study is a single-blind randomized controlled trial where ultrasound guided IH with ASS was compared to dry needling (DN) of the MTrPs. Both groups were taught self-stretch exercises (SSE) to be done everyday after the procedure. Outcome measures were pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5l questionnaire. All participants were assessed by a blinded assessor before the intervention, immediately after, 10 and 30 min, one week, two weeks, four weeks, three months, and six months after the procedure. Data Analysis: Two-way mixed ANOVA and follow-up independent T-test were conducted for the outcome measures across several time points between the 2 groups.ResultsA total of 46 participants with two dropouts were all included during the final analysis. Both groups demonstrated significant differences in VAS scores between baseline and the different time points, the IH + SSE group demonstrated the more significant effect size at as compared to the DN + SSE group. For EQ-5D-5l, no statistical differences were seen in all dimensions but there was a larger effect size for usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.ConclusionInterfascial hydrodissection is a technique that can manage both short and long term symptoms of MPS. This could be utilized as an alternative ...
Keywords myofascial pain syndrome ; interfascial hydrodissection ; upper trapezius ; upper back pain ; wet needling ; Other systems of medicine ; RZ201-999 ; Medical technology ; R855-855.5
Subject code 796
Language English
Publishing date 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z
Publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
Document type Article ; Online
Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

More links

Kategorien

To top