LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Your last searches

  1. AU="David Mwamkita"
  2. AU="Gutnisky, Diego"
  3. AU="Shachter, Amy"
  4. AU="Hashemi, Behnaz"
  5. AU=Roshanravan Hila
  6. AU=Corva P M
  7. AU="Wang, XiaoFeng"
  8. AU="Khalfallah, Ali"
  9. AU="Kopecky, O."
  10. AU="Mueller, C L"
  11. AU="Moreira, Ângela Nunes"
  12. AU="Lutscher, Daniel"
  13. AU="Ceretta Moreira, Eduardo"
  14. AU="Nalbant, Elif"

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Use of topical versus injectable anaesthesia for ShangRing circumcisions in men and boys in Kenya

Quentin Awori / Philip S Li / Richard K Lee / Daniel Ouma / Millicent Oundo / Mukhaye Barasa / Nereah Obura / David Mwamkita / Raymond Simba / Jairus Oketch / Nixon Nyangweso / Mary Maina / Nicholas Kiswi / Michael Kirui / Betty Chirchir / Marc Goldstein / Mark A Barone

PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 8, p e

Results from a randomized controlled trial.

2019  Volume 0218066

Abstract: Background The ShangRing is a disposable, collar clamp circumcision device pre-qualified for use in men and boys 13 years and above. It has been shown to be faster than conventional circumcision with comparable adverse event (AE) rates and high client ... ...

Abstract Background The ShangRing is a disposable, collar clamp circumcision device pre-qualified for use in men and boys 13 years and above. It has been shown to be faster than conventional circumcision with comparable adverse event (AE) rates and high client satisfaction. Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) has been shown to dramatically reduce the risk of HIV acquisition in males. However, the fear of pain during circumcision is an important barrier to uptake. Use of topical anesthesia thus presents an opportunity to address this. Objectives We sought to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of the use of topical anaesthesia with ShangRing circumcision of men and boys 10 years of age and above. Methods Participants were randomised 2:1 to receive topical or injectable anaesthesia. All participants underwent no-flip ShangRing circumcision. The primary outcome measure was pain. Secondary outcomes included ease of use of topical versus injectable anaesthesia, AEs and participant satisfaction. Results Compared to the topical group, participants in the injectable group reported significantly more pain on administration of the anesthesia and at approximately 20 minutes after the procedure. In the topical group, sufficient anaesthesia with topical cream was not achieved in 21 (9.3%) cases before the start of the procedure; in another 6 (2.6%), supplementary injectable anaesthesia was required as the circumcision was being carried out. The AE rate was significantly lower (p<0.01) in the topical (0%) vs. the injectable group (4.2%). The most common AE was pain during the post-operative period. All AEs were managed conservatively and resolved without sequeale. 96.7% of participants were satisfied with the appearance of the healed penis and 100% would recommend the ShangRing to others. All seven male circumcision providers involved in the study preferred topical to injectable anaesthesia. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the safety, improved clinical experience, effectiveness, and acceptability of the ...
Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
Subject code 610
Language English
Publishing date 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Document type Article ; Online
Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

More links

Kategorien

To top