LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentine version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.

Mignone, Federico / Calvo Delfino, Melina / Porollan, Juan Cruz / Graef, Camila Macarena / De la Rúa, Matias / Soliño, Santiago / Novoa, Gabriel / Salzberg, Sandra / Raguzzi, Ignacio Agustín / De Ilzarbe, Guadalupe / Rubiera Vicente, Constanza / Vera Amor, Juan Sebastian / Vuoto, Tomás / Pierobon, Andrés

Musculoskeletal science & practice

2022  Volume 62, Page(s) 102617

Abstract: Introduction: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Higher levels of catastrophizing were found in patients with LBP and this variable is associated with self-reported disability. The Pain Catastrophizing ... ...

Abstract Introduction: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Higher levels of catastrophizing were found in patients with LBP and this variable is associated with self-reported disability. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses catastrophizing in the presence of pain. Currently, an Argentine version of the PCS is not available.
Objective: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the PCS into Argentine Spanish and test the psychometric properties of the new version with chronic LBP patients.
Study design: Study of diagnostic accuracy/assessment scale.
Methods: The study was carried out in three consecutive phases following the COSMIN guidelines: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation. We included Argentine residents over 18 years with chronic LBP. We used the PCS and the Global rating of change (GROC) to assess the psychometric properties.
Results: No difficulties were present in the translation processes and the PCS-Arg was developed. The alfa Cronbach coefficient was 0.89. The standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change were 5.4 and 15.1 points, respectively. In the explanatory factorial analysis 3 components were identified. For the construct validity, the correlation between the PCS-Arg and disability and pain were r = 0.35 and rho = 0.04, respectively. The mean PCS score was 29.9. The lowest and highest scores were 3 and 52 points, therefore, no roof or ceiling effects of the total score were observed.
Conclusion: The PCS-Arg is a viable, reliable and valid tool for the assessment of catastrophizing in patients with chronic LBP.
Language English
Publishing date 2022-07-05
Publishing country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
ZDB-ID 2888772-4
ISSN 2468-7812
ISSN (online) 2468-7812
DOI 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102617
Shelf mark
Zs.A 5783: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top