LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article: Managed care & medical oncology: the focus is on value.

    Danielson, Elizabeth / Demartino, Jessica / Mullen, Jill A

    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN

    2010  Volume 8 Suppl 7, Page(s) S28–37

    Abstract: A previous NCCN Oncology Insights Reportdescribed the factors making cancer care a priority for managed care organizations (MCOs) and emerging trends in managing costs of cancer care. To better understand the concerns of MCOs and how they are addressing ... ...

    Abstract A previous NCCN Oncology Insights Reportdescribed the factors making cancer care a priority for managed care organizations (MCOs) and emerging trends in managing costs of cancer care. To better understand the concerns of MCOs and how they are addressing cancer costs and quality, NCCN interviewed senior physician executives from the 3 largest payors in the United States. The interviews provided insights into how these companies managed oncology care, with an emphasis on drugs and biologics. As a follow-up to the previous report, NCCN conducted additional interviews with medical executives from 10 MCOs between February and April 2010. The organizations represented in these interviews were Aetna, BlueCross BlueShield of Minnesota, BlueShield of Michigan, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, Empire BlueCross BlueShield, HealthNow, Humana, Independence BlueCross, Priority Health, and UnitedHealthcare. Although this group is diverse, it does not constitute a representative cross-section of MCOs across the United States. NCCN interviewed these executives about the priority of cancer care management for their organizations and the strategies being used to address cost and quality of cancer care. The information garnered from these interviews was qualitative in nature. A separate quantitative analysis of trends in oncology managed care has already been published, and throughout this report, data from the 2009-2010 Genentech Oncology Trend Report are referenced to supplement findings from the NCCN interviews.
    MeSH term(s) Antineoplastic Agents/economics ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use ; Community Participation ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Drug Costs ; Health Care Costs ; Health Care Reform ; Humans ; Insurance Coverage ; Insurance, Health ; Interviews as Topic ; Managed Care Programs/economics ; Managed Care Programs/standards ; Medical Oncology/economics ; Medication Adherence ; Neoplasms/economics ; Neoplasms/therapy ; Patient Participation ; Physician Executives ; Quality of Health Care ; Reimbursement Mechanisms/organization & administration ; Reimbursement Mechanisms/trends ; United States
    Chemical Substances Antineoplastic Agents
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-10-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2250759-0
    ISSN 1540-1405
    ISSN 1540-1405
    DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0132
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: NCCN molecular testing white paper: effectiveness, efficiency, and reimbursement.

    Engstrom, Paul F / Bloom, Mara G / Demetri, George Daniel / Febbo, Phillip G / Goeckeler, William / Ladanyi, Marc / Loy, Bryan / Murphy, Kate / Nerenberg, Michael / Papagni, Paul / Robson, Mark / Sweetman, Robert W / Tunis, Sean / Demartino, Jessica / Larsen, Jonathan K

    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN

    2011  Volume 9 Suppl 6, Page(s) S1–16

    Abstract: Personalized medicine in oncology is maturing and evolving rapidly, and the use of molecular biomarkers in clinical decision-making is growing. This raises important issues regarding the safe, effective, and efficient deployment of molecular tests to ... ...

    Abstract Personalized medicine in oncology is maturing and evolving rapidly, and the use of molecular biomarkers in clinical decision-making is growing. This raises important issues regarding the safe, effective, and efficient deployment of molecular tests to guide appropriate care, specifically regarding laboratory-developed tests and companion diagnostics. In May 2011, NCCN assembled a work group composed of thought leaders from NCCN Member Institutions and other organizations to identify challenges and provide guidance regarding molecular testing in oncology and its corresponding utility from clinical, scientific, and coverage policy standpoints. The NCCN Molecular Testing Work Group identified challenges surrounding molecular testing, including health care provider knowledge, determining clinical utility, coding and billing for molecular tests, maintaining clinical and analytic validity of molecular tests, efficient use of specimens, and building clinical evidence.
    MeSH term(s) Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis ; Humans ; Medical Oncology/methods ; Medical Oncology/standards ; Medical Oncology/trends ; Molecular Biology/methods ; Molecular Biology/standards ; Molecular Biology/trends ; Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Neoplasms/genetics
    Chemical Substances Biomarkers, Tumor
    Language English
    Publishing date 2011-12-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Guideline ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2250759-0
    ISSN 1540-1413 ; 1540-1405
    ISSN (online) 1540-1413
    ISSN 1540-1405
    DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0138
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: NCCN Oncology Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies White Paper: Recommendations for Stakeholders.

    Johnson, Philip E / Dahlman, George / Eng, Kirby / Garg, Rekha / Gottlieb, Scott / Hoffman, James M / Howell, Peyton / Jahanzeb, Mohammad / Johnson, Shirley / Mackler, Emily / Rubino, Mark / Sarokhan, Brenda / Marc Stewart, F / Tyler, Tim / Vose, Julie M / Weinstein, Sharon / Li, Edward C / Demartino, Jessica

    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN

    2010  Volume 8 Suppl 7, Page(s) S7–S27

    Abstract: REMS are a particularly important issue for oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). A disproportionate number of drugs with complex REMS are used in patients with cancer or hematologic disorders. REMS policies and processes within ... ...

    Abstract REMS are a particularly important issue for oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). A disproportionate number of drugs with complex REMS are used in patients with cancer or hematologic disorders. REMS policies and processes within oncology may act as a model for other clinical areas. A breadth of experience and access to a wide knowledge base exists within oncology that will ensure appropriate development and consideration of the practical implications of REMS. NCCN is uniquely positioned to assume a leadership role in this process given its status as the arbiter of high-quality cancer care based on its world-leading institutions and clinicians. Notwithstanding the potential benefits, the successful design, implementation, and analysis of the FDA's recent requirement for REMS for some high-risk drugs and biologics will present significant challenges for stakeholders, including patients, providers, cancer centers, manufacturers, payors, health information technology vendors, and regulatory agencies. To provide guidance to these stakeholders regarding REMS challenges, the NCCN assembled a work group comprised of thought leaders from NCCN Member Institutions and other outside experts. The Work Group identified challenges across the REMS spectrum, including the areas of standardization, development and assessment of REMS programs, medication guides, provider knowledge and impact on prescribing, provider burden and compensation, and incorporation of REMS into clinical practice.
    MeSH term(s) Advisory Committees/organization & administration ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use ; Biological Products/therapeutic use ; Drug Industry/standards ; Drug Industry/trends ; Drug Labeling/standards ; Drug Labeling/trends ; Drug Monitoring/standards ; Drug Monitoring/trends ; Drug Therapy/methods ; Drug Therapy/standards ; Drug Therapy/trends ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control ; Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use ; Expert Testimony ; Health Care Surveys ; Health Literacy ; Health Personnel/economics ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Medical Oncology/methods ; Medical Oncology/standards ; Medical Oncology/trends ; Off-Label Use/standards ; Reimbursement Mechanisms ; Risk Assessment/methods ; Risk Assessment/standards ; Risk Assessment/trends ; Safety Management/methods ; Safety Management/standards ; Safety Management/trends ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence
    Chemical Substances Antineoplastic Agents ; Biological Products ; Drugs, Investigational
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-10-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Guideline ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2250759-0
    ISSN 1540-1405
    ISSN 1540-1405
    DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0135
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top