LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Preferred Role in Health Care Decision Making Over Time in Patients With Heart Failure: My Decision or My Doctor's Decision?

    Deng, Lubin R / Matlock, Daniel D / Bekelman, David B

    Journal of cardiac failure

    2022  Volume 28, Issue 8, Page(s) 1362–1366

    Abstract: Background: Understanding patients' preferred role in decision making can improve patient-centered care. This study aimed to determine change and the predictors of change in preferred decision-making roles over time in patients with heart failure.: ... ...

    Abstract Background: Understanding patients' preferred role in decision making can improve patient-centered care. This study aimed to determine change and the predictors of change in preferred decision-making roles over time in patients with heart failure.
    Methods and results: During the CASA (Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness) trial, patients' preferred roles in decision making were measured using the Control Preferences Scale (range 1-5; higher = less active; n = 312) at 4 timepoints over 1 year. The effect of the CASA intervention on preferred decision-making roles was tested using generalized linear mixed models. Whether preferences changed over time in the whole population was determined using linear regression. Demographic and health-related factors were examined as predictors of change using multiple linear regression. At baseline, most participants preferred active (score 1-2, 37.2%) or collaborative (score 3, 44.9%) roles. The CASA intervention did not influence preferred decision-making roles (P > 0.1). Preferences significantly changed over 1 year (P < 0.01), becoming more active (82.1%, 84.2%, 89.0%, 90.1% active/collaborative at each timepoint). Among all models and covariates, there were no significant predictors of change (P > 0.1).
    Conclusions: Patients' preferred roles in decision making change over time, but changes are not well predicted. Clinicians should frequently and directly communicate with patients about their preferred decision-making roles.
    MeSH term(s) Decision Making ; Heart Failure/diagnosis ; Heart Failure/therapy ; Humans ; Patient Participation ; Patient Preference
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-23
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1281194-4
    ISSN 1532-8414 ; 1071-9164
    ISSN (online) 1532-8414
    ISSN 1071-9164
    DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.03.357
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the DEG, a Three-Item Dyspnea Measure.

    Ha, Duc M / Deng, Lubin R / Lange, Allison V / Swigris, Jeffrey J / Bekelman, David B

    Journal of general internal medicine

    2022  Volume 37, Issue 10, Page(s) 2541–2547

    Abstract: Background: Dyspnea is a common and debilitating symptom that affects many different patient populations. Dyspnea measures should assess multiple domains.: Objective: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of an ultra-brief, multi- ... ...

    Abstract Background: Dyspnea is a common and debilitating symptom that affects many different patient populations. Dyspnea measures should assess multiple domains.
    Objective: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of an ultra-brief, multi-dimensional dyspnea measure.
    Design: We adapted the DEG from the PEG, a valid 3-item pain measure, to assess average dyspnea intensity (D), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and dyspnea burden with general activity (G).
    Participants: We used data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial among outpatients with heart failure.
    Main measures: We evaluated reliability (Cronbach's alpha), concurrent validity with the Memorial-Symptom-Assessment-Scale (MSAS) shortness-of-breath distress-orbothersome item and 7-item Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder (GAD-7) scale, knowngroups validity with New-York-Heart-Association-Functional-Classification (NYHA) 1-2 or 3-4 and presence or absence of comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), responsiveness with the MSAS item as an anchor, and calculated a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using distribution methods.
    Key results: Among 312 participants, the DEG was reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.92). The mean (standard deviation) DEG score was 5.26 (2.36) (range 0-10) points. DEG scores correlated strongly with the MSAS shortness of breath distress-or-bothersome item (r=0.66) and moderately with GAD-7 categories (ρ=0.36). DEG scores were statistically significantly lower among patients with NYHA 1-2 compared to 3-4 [mean difference (standard error): 1.22 (0.27) points, p<0.01], and those without compared to with comorbid COPD [0.87 (0.27) points, p<0.01]. The DEG was highly sensitive to change, with MCID of 0.59-1.34 points, or 11-25% change.
    Conclusions: The novel, ultra-brief DEG measure is reliable, valid, and highly responsive. Future studies should evaluate the DEG's sensitivity to interventions, use anchor-based methods to triangulate MCID estimates, and determine its prognostic usefulness among patients with chronic cardiopulmonary and other diseases.
    MeSH term(s) Dyspnea/diagnosis ; Dyspnea/epidemiology ; Dyspnea/etiology ; Humans ; Psychometrics ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 639008-0
    ISSN 1525-1497 ; 0884-8734
    ISSN (online) 1525-1497
    ISSN 0884-8734
    DOI 10.1007/s11606-021-07307-1
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Factor Structure of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy: Spiritual Well-Being Scale in Patients with Heart Failure Depends on Method Used.

    Deng, Lubin R / Masters, Kevin S / Schmiege, Sarah J / Hess, Edward / Bekelman, David B

    Journal of palliative medicine

    2021  Volume 24, Issue 6, Page(s) 807–808

    MeSH term(s) Chronic Disease ; Heart Failure ; Humans ; Quality of Life ; Spirituality
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-06-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 1427361-5
    ISSN 1557-7740 ; 1096-6218
    ISSN (online) 1557-7740
    ISSN 1096-6218
    DOI 10.1089/jpm.2021.0064
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Two Factor Structures Possible for the FACIT-Sp in Patients With Heart Failure.

    Deng, Lubin R / Masters, Kevin S / Schmiege, Sarah J / Hess, Edward / Bekelman, David B

    Journal of pain and symptom management

    2021  Volume 62, Issue 5, Page(s) 1034–1040

    Abstract: Context: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) is a 12-item measure of spiritual well-being in chronic illness originally developed in patients with cancer. The overall scale, a two-factor model ( ... ...

    Abstract Context: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) is a 12-item measure of spiritual well-being in chronic illness originally developed in patients with cancer. The overall scale, a two-factor model (meaning/peace, faith), and a three-factor model (meaning, peace, faith) have been proposed for the FACIT-Sp, and consensus on the best factor structure has not been reached. In addition, the factor structure of the FACIT-Sp has not been considered in patients with heart failure.
    Objectives: To examine the factor structure of the FACIT-Sp in heart failure patients.
    Methods: A confirmatory factor analysis framework was used to test three competing models on 217 patients with heart failure using data from the CASA (Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness) trial. The overall scale (single factor), two-factor, and three-factor models were tested using baseline data, then confirmed with 12-month data. Model modifications were made based on empirical inspection of baseline data and replicated using 12-month data. Cronbach's alpha and correlations with measures of quality of life and psychological health were examined.
    Results: All three models had strong factor loadings on all items except the negatively worded items. The two-factor and three-factor models fit reasonably well after modifications, but the single factor did not fit well (1/2/3-factor: RMSEA 0.14/0.09/0.06, CFI 0.85/0.93/0.97, SRMR 0.09/0.05/0.04). Internal consistency was sufficient for all factors.
    Conclusion: The two-factor and three-factor models were supported in heart failure patients. The three-factor model demonstrated better statistical fit but was not more interpretable.
    Key message: This study investigated the factor structure of the FACIT-Sp in patients with heart failure. The two-factor and three-factor models were supported, but the single factor model was not. Negatively worded items did not perform well.
    MeSH term(s) Heart Failure/diagnosis ; Heart Failure/therapy ; Humans ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Spirituality ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-19
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 639142-4
    ISSN 1873-6513 ; 0885-3924
    ISSN (online) 1873-6513
    ISSN 0885-3924
    DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.05.009
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: How Does Spiritual Well-Being Change Over Time Among US Patients with Heart Failure and What Predicts Change?

    Deng, Lubin R / Doyon, Katherine J / Masters, Kevin S / Steinhauser, Karen E / Langner, Paula R / Siler, Shaunna / Bekelman, David B

    Journal of religion and health

    2022  

    Abstract: Few studies have examined how spiritual well-being changes over time in patients with heart failure. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness (CASA) trial (N = 314). Spiritual well- ... ...

    Abstract Few studies have examined how spiritual well-being changes over time in patients with heart failure. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness (CASA) trial (N = 314). Spiritual well-being was measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Of the 165 patients with spiritual well-being data at follow-up, 65 (39%) experienced probable clinically meaningful changes (> 0.5 SD) in spiritual well-being (35 improved, 30 declined). Increased pain (p = 0.04), decreased dyspnea (p < 0.01), and increased life completion (p = 0.02) were associated with improvement in overall spiritual well-being. Exploratory analyses found different predictors for FACIT-Sp subscales.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2017250-3
    ISSN 1573-6571 ; 0022-4197
    ISSN (online) 1573-6571
    ISSN 0022-4197
    DOI 10.1007/s10943-022-01712-4
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top