LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article: Could "Low Quality of Life" Rather Than "Significant Symptoms" Be Better Criteria for the Selection of Patients for the Repair of a Giant Hiatus Hernia?

    Elniel, Mohammed / Chaudhury, Madhu / Desai, Nasreen / Lo, Christina / Daté, Ravindra S

    Cureus

    2024  Volume 16, Issue 3, Page(s) e55740

    Abstract: Purpose Giant hiatus hernia (GHH) repair is undertaken electively in symptomatic patients, to prevent complications such as gastric volvulus and subsequent mortality. Advances in laparoscopy and perioperative care have reduced the risk of GHH repair, and ...

    Abstract Purpose Giant hiatus hernia (GHH) repair is undertaken electively in symptomatic patients, to prevent complications such as gastric volvulus and subsequent mortality. Advances in laparoscopy and perioperative care have reduced the risk of GHH repair, and improvement in quality of life (QoL) has become an important outcome measure. In our unit, we have been assessing QoL in all the operated as well as non-operated patients with GHH, using the "Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia" (QOLRAD) questionnaire. We sought to evaluate differences in QoL between patients who were managed conservatively for GHH and those who underwent GHH repair over a two-year period. Methods All patients seen in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tertiary Unit in Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust with GHH between January 2015 and December 2022 were identified from a prospectively kept database. QOLRAD scores were analyzed and compared between conservatively and operatively managed patients using the Mann-Whitney U test. Demographic and operative outcome data were also collected. Results Eighty-seven patients with GHH were included. QoL of 51 patients improved significantly after elective surgery. Five out of 36 patients, who were initially treated conservatively, elected to have repair during their follow-up period. These 5 Patients had a lower initial QOLRAD score in comparison to those whose management remained conservative (2.72 vs 5.05, Mann Whitney U test p=0.034), and their QOLRAD scores also improved significantly after the operation. QOLRAD scores in conservatively managed patients remained stable over a two-year follow-up period. Conclusion Objectively calculated low QoL may be a more useful tool than subjective symptoms in selecting patients for elective repair of GHH.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2747273-5
    ISSN 2168-8184
    ISSN 2168-8184
    DOI 10.7759/cureus.55740
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Exploring UK medical school differences: the MedDifs study of selection, teaching, student and F1 perceptions, postgraduate outcomes and fitness to practise.

    McManus, I C / Harborne, Andrew Christopher / Horsfall, Hugo Layard / Joseph, Tobin / Smith, Daniel T / Marshall-Andon, Tess / Samuels, Ryan / Kearsley, Joshua William / Abbas, Nadine / Baig, Hassan / Beecham, Joseph / Benons, Natasha / Caird, Charlie / Clark, Ryan / Cope, Thomas / Coultas, James / Debenham, Luke / Douglas, Sarah / Eldridge, Jack /
    Hughes-Gooding, Thomas / Jakubowska, Agnieszka / Jones, Oliver / Lancaster, Eve / MacMillan, Calum / McAllister, Ross / Merzougui, Wassim / Phillips, Ben / Phillips, Simon / Risk, Omar / Sage, Adam / Sooltangos, Aisha / Spencer, Robert / Tajbakhsh, Roxanne / Adesalu, Oluseyi / Aganin, Ivan / Ahmed, Ammar / Aiken, Katherine / Akeredolu, Alimatu-Sadia / Alam, Ibrahim / Ali, Aamna / Anderson, Richard / Ang, Jia Jun / Anis, Fady Sameh / Aojula, Sonam / Arthur, Catherine / Ashby, Alena / Ashraf, Ahmed / Aspinall, Emma / Awad, Mark / Yahaya, Abdul-Muiz Azri / Badhrinarayanan, Shreya / Bandyopadhyay, Soham / Barnes, Sam / Bassey-Duke, Daisy / Boreham, Charlotte / Braine, Rebecca / Brandreth, Joseph / Carrington, Zoe / Cashin, Zoe / Chatterjee, Shaunak / Chawla, Mehar / Chean, Chung Shen / Clements, Chris / Clough, Richard / Coulthurst, Jessica / Curry, Liam / Daniels, Vinnie Christine / Davies, Simon / Davis, Rebecca / De Waal, Hanelie / Desai, Nasreen / Douglas, Hannah / Druce, James / Ejamike, Lady-Namera / Esere, Meron / Eyre, Alex / Fazmin, Ibrahim Talal / Fitzgerald-Smith, Sophia / Ford, Verity / Freeston, Sarah / Garnett, Katherine / General, Whitney / Gilbert, Helen / Gowie, Zein / Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran / Gudka, Keshni / Gumber, Leher / Gupta, Rishi / Harlow, Chris / Harrington, Amy / Heaney, Adele / Ho, Wing Hang Serene / Holloway, Lucy / Hood, Christina / Houghton, Eleanor / Houshangi, Saba / Howard, Emma / Human, Benjamin / Hunter, Harriet / Hussain, Ifrah / Hussain, Sami / Jackson-Taylor, Richard Thomas / Jacob-Ramsdale, Bronwen / Janjuha, Ryan / Jawad, Saleh / Jelani, Muzzamil / Johnston, David / Jones, Mike / Kalidindi, Sadhana / Kalsi, Savraj / Kalyanasundaram, Asanish / Kane, Anna / Kaur, Sahaj / Al-Othman, Othman Khaled / Khan, Qaisar / Khullar, Sajan / Kirkland, Priscilla / Lawrence-Smith, Hannah / Leeson, Charlotte / Lenaerts, Julius Elisabeth Richard / Long, Kerry / Lubbock, Simon / Burrell, Jamie Mac Donald / Maguire, Rachel / Mahendran, Praveen / Majeed, Saad / Malhotra, Prabhjot Singh / Mandagere, Vinay / Mantelakis, Angelos / McGovern, Sophie / Mosuro, Anjola / Moxley, Adam / Mustoe, Sophie / Myers, Sam / Nadeem, Kiran / Nasseri, Reza / Newman, Tom / Nzewi, Richard / Ogborne, Rosalie / Omatseye, Joyce / Paddock, Sophie / Parkin, James / Patel, Mohit / Pawar, Sohini / Pearce, Stuart / Penrice, Samuel / Purdy, Julian / Ramjan, Raisa / Randhawa, Ratan / Rasul, Usman / Raymond-Taggert, Elliot / Razey, Rebecca / Razzaghi, Carmel / Reel, Eimear / Revell, Elliot John / Rigbye, Joanna / Rotimi, Oloruntobi / Said, Abdelrahman / Sanders, Emma / Sangal, Pranoy / Grandal, Nora Sangvik / Shah, Aadam / Shah, Rahul Atul / Shotton, Oliver / Sims, Daniel / Smart, Katie / Smith, Martha Amy / Smith, Nick / Sopian, Aninditya Salma / South, Matthew / Speller, Jessica / Syer, Tom J / Ta, Ngan Hong / Tadross, Daniel / Thompson, Benjamin / Trevett, Jess / Tyler, Matthew / Ullah, Roshan / Utukuri, Mrudula / Vadera, Shree / Van Den Tooren, Harriet / Venturini, Sara / Vijayakumar, Aradhya / Vine, Melanie / Wellbelove, Zoe / Wittner, Liora / Yong, Geoffrey Hong Kiat / Ziyada, Farris / Devine, Oliver Patrick

    BMC medicine

    2020  Volume 18, Issue 1, Page(s) 136

    Abstract: Background: Medical schools differ, particularly in their teaching, but it is unclear whether such differences matter, although influential claims are often made. The Medical School Differences (MedDifs) study brings together a wide range of measures of ...

    Abstract Background: Medical schools differ, particularly in their teaching, but it is unclear whether such differences matter, although influential claims are often made. The Medical School Differences (MedDifs) study brings together a wide range of measures of UK medical schools, including postgraduate performance, fitness to practise issues, specialty choice, preparedness, satisfaction, teaching styles, entry criteria and institutional factors.
    Method: Aggregated data were collected for 50 measures across 29 UK medical schools. Data include institutional history (e.g. rate of production of hospital and GP specialists in the past), curricular influences (e.g. PBL schools, spend per student, staff-student ratio), selection measures (e.g. entry grades), teaching and assessment (e.g. traditional vs PBL, specialty teaching, self-regulated learning), student satisfaction, Foundation selection scores, Foundation satisfaction, postgraduate examination performance and fitness to practise (postgraduate progression, GMC sanctions). Six specialties (General Practice, Psychiatry, Anaesthetics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Internal Medicine, Surgery) were examined in more detail.
    Results: Medical school differences are stable across time (median alpha = 0.835). The 50 measures were highly correlated, 395 (32.2%) of 1225 correlations being significant with p < 0.05, and 201 (16.4%) reached a Tukey-adjusted criterion of p < 0.0025. Problem-based learning (PBL) schools differ on many measures, including lower performance on postgraduate assessments. While these are in part explained by lower entry grades, a surprising finding is that schools such as PBL schools which reported greater student satisfaction with feedback also showed lower performance at postgraduate examinations. More medical school teaching of psychiatry, surgery and anaesthetics did not result in more specialist trainees. Schools that taught more general practice did have more graduates entering GP training, but those graduates performed less well in MRCGP examinations, the negative correlation resulting from numbers of GP trainees and exam outcomes being affected both by non-traditional teaching and by greater historical production of GPs. Postgraduate exam outcomes were also higher in schools with more self-regulated learning, but lower in larger medical schools. A path model for 29 measures found a complex causal nexus, most measures causing or being caused by other measures. Postgraduate exam performance was influenced by earlier attainment, at entry to Foundation and entry to medical school (the so-called academic backbone), and by self-regulated learning. Foundation measures of satisfaction, including preparedness, had no subsequent influence on outcomes. Fitness to practise issues were more frequent in schools producing more male graduates and more GPs.
    Conclusions: Medical schools differ in large numbers of ways that are causally interconnected. Differences between schools in postgraduate examination performance, training problems and GMC sanctions have important implications for the quality of patient care and patient safety.
    MeSH term(s) Female ; Humans ; Male ; Schools, Medical/standards ; Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data ; United Kingdom
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-14
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2131669-7
    ISSN 1741-7015 ; 1741-7015
    ISSN (online) 1741-7015
    ISSN 1741-7015
    DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01572-3
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: The Analysis of Teaching of Medical Schools (AToMS) survey: an analysis of 47,258 timetabled teaching events in 25 UK medical schools relating to timing, duration, teaching formats, teaching content, and problem-based learning.

    Devine, Oliver Patrick / Harborne, Andrew Christopher / Horsfall, Hugo Layard / Joseph, Tobin / Marshall-Andon, Tess / Samuels, Ryan / Kearsley, Joshua William / Abbas, Nadine / Baig, Hassan / Beecham, Joseph / Benons, Natasha / Caird, Charlie / Clark, Ryan / Cope, Thomas / Coultas, James / Debenham, Luke / Douglas, Sarah / Eldridge, Jack / Hughes-Gooding, Thomas /
    Jakubowska, Agnieszka / Jones, Oliver / Lancaster, Eve / MacMillan, Calum / McAllister, Ross / Merzougui, Wassim / Phillips, Ben / Phillips, Simon / Risk, Omar / Sage, Adam / Sooltangos, Aisha / Spencer, Robert / Tajbakhsh, Roxanne / Adesalu, Oluseyi / Aganin, Ivan / Ahmed, Ammar / Aiken, Katherine / Akeredolu, Alimatu-Sadia / Alam, Ibrahim / Ali, Aamna / Anderson, Richard / Ang, Jia Jun / Anis, Fady Sameh / Aojula, Sonam / Arthur, Catherine / Ashby, Alena / Ashraf, Ahmed / Aspinall, Emma / Awad, Mark / Yahaya, Abdul-Muiz Azri / Badhrinarayanan, Shreya / Bandyopadhyay, Soham / Barnes, Sam / Bassey-Duke, Daisy / Boreham, Charlotte / Braine, Rebecca / Brandreth, Joseph / Carrington, Zoe / Cashin, Zoe / Chatterjee, Shaunak / Chawla, Mehar / Chean, Chung Shen / Clements, Chris / Clough, Richard / Coulthurst, Jessica / Curry, Liam / Daniels, Vinnie Christine / Davies, Simon / Davis, Rebecca / De Waal, Hanelie / Desai, Nasreen / Douglas, Hannah / Druce, James / Ejamike, Lady-Namera / Esere, Meron / Eyre, Alex / Fazmin, Ibrahim Talal / Fitzgerald-Smith, Sophia / Ford, Verity / Freeston, Sarah / Garnett, Katherine / General, Whitney / Gilbert, Helen / Gowie, Zein / Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran / Gudka, Keshni / Gumber, Leher / Gupta, Rishi / Harlow, Chris / Harrington, Amy / Heaney, Adele / Ho, Wing Hang Serene / Holloway, Lucy / Hood, Christina / Houghton, Eleanor / Houshangi, Saba / Howard, Emma / Human, Benjamin / Hunter, Harriet / Hussain, Ifrah / Hussain, Sami / Jackson-Taylor, Richard Thomas / Jacob-Ramsdale, Bronwen / Janjuha, Ryan / Jawad, Saleh / Jelani, Muzzamil / Johnston, David / Jones, Mike / Kalidindi, Sadhana / Kalsi, Savraj / Kalyanasundaram, Asanish / Kane, Anna / Kaur, Sahaj / Al-Othman, Othman Khaled / Khan, Qaisar / Khullar, Sajan / Kirkland, Priscilla / Lawrence-Smith, Hannah / Leeson, Charlotte / Lenaerts, Julius Elisabeth Richard / Long, Kerry / Lubbock, Simon / Burrell, Jamie Mac Donald / Maguire, Rachel / Mahendran, Praveen / Majeed, Saad / Malhotra, Prabhjot Singh / Mandagere, Vinay / Mantelakis, Angelos / McGovern, Sophie / Mosuro, Anjola / Moxley, Adam / Mustoe, Sophie / Myers, Sam / Nadeem, Kiran / Nasseri, Reza / Newman, Tom / Nzewi, Richard / Ogborne, Rosalie / Omatseye, Joyce / Paddock, Sophie / Parkin, James / Patel, Mohit / Pawar, Sohini / Pearce, Stuart / Penrice, Samuel / Purdy, Julian / Ramjan, Raisa / Randhawa, Ratan / Rasul, Usman / Raymond-Taggert, Elliot / Razey, Rebecca / Razzaghi, Carmel / Reel, Eimear / Revell, Elliot John / Rigbye, Joanna / Rotimi, Oloruntobi / Said, Abdelrahman / Sanders, Emma / Sangal, Pranoy / Grandal, Nora Sangvik / Shah, Aadam / Shah, Rahul Atul / Shotton, Oliver / Sims, Daniel / Smart, Katie / Smith, Martha Amy / Smith, Nick / Sopian, Aninditya Salma / South, Matthew / Speller, Jessica / Syer, Tom J / Ta, Ngan Hong / Tadross, Daniel / Thompson, Benjamin / Trevett, Jess / Tyler, Matthew / Ullah, Roshan / Utukuri, Mrudula / Vadera, Shree / Van Den Tooren, Harriet / Venturini, Sara / Vijayakumar, Aradhya / Vine, Melanie / Wellbelove, Zoe / Wittner, Liora / Yong, Geoffrey Hong Kiat / Ziyada, Farris / McManus, I C

    BMC medicine

    2020  Volume 18, Issue 1, Page(s) 126

    Abstract: Background: What subjects UK medical schools teach, what ways they teach subjects, and how much they teach those subjects is unclear. Whether teaching differences matter is a separate, important question. This study provides a detailed picture of ... ...

    Abstract Background: What subjects UK medical schools teach, what ways they teach subjects, and how much they teach those subjects is unclear. Whether teaching differences matter is a separate, important question. This study provides a detailed picture of timetabled undergraduate teaching activity at 25 UK medical schools, particularly in relation to problem-based learning (PBL).
    Method: The Analysis of Teaching of Medical Schools (AToMS) survey used detailed timetables provided by 25 schools with standard 5-year courses. Timetabled teaching events were coded in terms of course year, duration, teaching format, and teaching content. Ten schools used PBL. Teaching times from timetables were validated against two other studies that had assessed GP teaching and lecture, seminar, and tutorial times.
    Results: A total of 47,258 timetabled teaching events in the academic year 2014/2015 were analysed, including SSCs (student-selected components) and elective studies. A typical UK medical student receives 3960 timetabled hours of teaching during their 5-year course. There was a clear difference between the initial 2 years which mostly contained basic medical science content and the later 3 years which mostly consisted of clinical teaching, although some clinical teaching occurs in the first 2 years. Medical schools differed in duration, format, and content of teaching. Two main factors underlay most of the variation between schools, Traditional vs PBL teaching and Structured vs Unstructured teaching. A curriculum map comparing medical schools was constructed using those factors. PBL schools differed on a number of measures, having more PBL teaching time, fewer lectures, more GP teaching, less surgery, less formal teaching of basic science, and more sessions with unspecified content.
    Discussion: UK medical schools differ in both format and content of teaching. PBL and non-PBL schools clearly differ, albeit with substantial variation within groups, and overlap in the middle. The important question of whether differences in teaching matter in terms of outcomes is analysed in a companion study (MedDifs) which examines how teaching differences relate to university infrastructure, entry requirements, student perceptions, and outcomes in Foundation Programme and postgraduate training.
    MeSH term(s) Curriculum/standards ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-14
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2131669-7
    ISSN 1741-7015 ; 1741-7015
    ISSN (online) 1741-7015
    ISSN 1741-7015
    DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01571-4
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top