LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Back to previous search Search history
Advanced search

Your last searches

  1. AU="Duhancioglu, Gabriel"
  2. AU="Guldenmund, Pieter"
  3. AU="Rietveld, Petra J"

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Osteoradionecrosis of the Skull Base in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

    Greenhill, Mark J / Jean, Shanen P / Duhancioglu, Gabriel / Le, Christopher H / Mushtaq, Raza

    Radiology. Imaging cancer

    2023  Volume 5, Issue 1, Page(s) e220159

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology ; Osteoradionecrosis/diagnostic imaging ; Osteoradionecrosis/pathology ; Skull Base/diagnostic imaging ; Skull Base/pathology ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology ; Head
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-01-27
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2638-616X
    ISSN (online) 2638-616X
    DOI 10.1148/rycan.220159
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  2. Article ; Online: Traveling gallstones: review of MR imaging and surgical pathology features of gallstone disease and its complications in the gallbladder and beyond.

    Duhancioglu, Gabriel / Arif-Tiwari, Hina / Natali, Stefano / Reynolds, Conner / Lalwani, Neeraj / Fulcher, Ann

    Abdominal radiology (New York)

    2023  Volume 49, Issue 3, Page(s) 722–737

    Abstract: Gallstone-related disease comprises a spectrum of conditions resulting from biliary stone formation, leading to obstruction and inflammatory complications. These can significantly impact patient quality of life and carry high morbidity if not accurately ... ...

    Abstract Gallstone-related disease comprises a spectrum of conditions resulting from biliary stone formation, leading to obstruction and inflammatory complications. These can significantly impact patient quality of life and carry high morbidity if not accurately detected. Appropriate imaging is essential for evaluating the extent of gallstone disease and assuring appropriate clinical management. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques (including Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are increasingly used for diagnosis of gallstone disease and its complications and provide high contrast resolution and facilitate tissue-level assessment of gallstone disease processes. In this review we seek to delve deep into the spectrum of MR imaging in diagnose of gallstone-related disease within the gallbladder and complications related to migration of the gallstones to the gall bladder neck or cystic duct, common hepatic duct or bile duct (choledocholithiasis) and beyond, including gallstone pancreatitis, gallstone ileus, Bouveret syndrome, and dropped gallstones, by offering key examples from our practice. Furthermore, we will specifically highlight the crucial role of MRI and MRCP for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient outcomes in gallstone-related disease and showcase relevant surgical pathology specimens of various gallstone related complications.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Gallstones/diagnostic imaging ; Gallstones/complications ; Pathology, Surgical ; Quality of Life ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2839786-1
    ISSN 2366-0058 ; 2366-004X
    ISSN (online) 2366-0058
    ISSN 2366-004X
    DOI 10.1007/s00261-023-04107-5
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Full text online

    More links

    Kategorien

    In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

    Zs.A 1262: Show issues Location:
    Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
    bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
    Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
    ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

  3. Article ; Online: Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spine Surgery.

    Narain, Ankur S / Hijji, Fady Y / Duhancioglu, Gabriel / Haws, Brittany E / Khechen, Benjamin / Manning, Blaine T / Colman, Matthew W / Singh, Kern

    Clinical spine surgery

    2018  Volume 31, Issue 3, Page(s) E184–E192

    Abstract: Study design: Prospective questionnaire.: Objective: To describe patient perceptions of minimally invasive spine (MIS) versus open surgery, and to determine which factors are most heavily considered by the patient when choosing between approaches.: ...

    Abstract Study design: Prospective questionnaire.
    Objective: To describe patient perceptions of minimally invasive spine (MIS) versus open surgery, and to determine which factors are most heavily considered by the patient when choosing between approaches.
    Summary of background data: MIS surgery has increased in popularity due to proposed advantages in the perioperative and immediate postoperative periods. However, patient preferences and understanding with regard to the differences between MIS and open surgery have not been elucidated.
    Materials and methods: An anonymous questionnaire consisting of 30 questions was administered to patients scheduled to see either an MIS surgeon or an open spine surgeon for a clinical evaluation from 2016 to 2017. Six questions asked about patient demographics and medical history. Nine questions asked respondents to rate the importance of several criteria when deciding between MIS and open surgery. In total, 15 multiple choice and free response questions asked respondents about their perceptions of MIS versus open surgery with regard to surgical and physician characteristics.
    Results: In total, 326 patients completed the survey. The 3 most important criteria for patients when choosing between open and MIS surgery were: long-term outcomes, surgeon's recommendation, and complication risk. When compared with MIS surgery, the majority of patients perceived open surgery to be more painful (83.8%), have increased complication risk (78.5%), have increased recovery time (89.3%), have increased costs (68.1%), and require heavier sedation (62.6%). If required to have spine surgery in the future, the majority of both patient groups would prefer a minimally invasive approach (80.0%).
    Conclusions: Long-term outcomes, surgeon's recommendation, and complication risk were the most important criteria identified by patients when choosing between open and MIS surgery. Patients also perceived MIS surgery to have advantages over open surgery with regard to postoperative pain, complication risk, recovery time, cost, and anesthesia requirement. Most patients seem to prefer a minimally invasive approach to their treatment.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Patient Preference ; Spine/surgery ; Surgeons ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-02-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2849646-2
    ISSN 2380-0194 ; 2380-0186
    ISSN (online) 2380-0194
    ISSN 2380-0186
    DOI 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000618
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

    In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

    Zs.A 2427: Show issues Location:
    Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
    bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
    Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
    ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

  4. Article ; Online: Functional Capacity Evaluation Following Spinal Fusion Surgery.

    Bohl, Daniel D / Ahn, Junyoung / Collins, Michael / Mayo, Benjamin C / Massel, Dustin H / Aboushaala, Khaled / Kamath, Rahul / Duhancioglu, Gabriel / Elbeik, Moustafa / Singh, Kern

    Spine

    2016  Volume 41, Issue 13, Page(s) 1104–1110

    Abstract: Study design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.: Objective: The aim of the study was to characterize outcomes of functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) amongst patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.: Summary of background ... ...

    Abstract Study design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
    Objective: The aim of the study was to characterize outcomes of functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) amongst patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.
    Summary of background data: Injured workers often undergo an FCE upon reaching maximal medical improvement following surgery. To date, few studies have examined the results of FCEs following spinal fusion.
    Methods: Patients undergoing an FCE following a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were retrospectively identified. Based upon the FCE report, each patient's job-related preoperative physical requirement and postoperative work capability was categorized as light, medium, or heavy. Patients were characterized as being able to meet their preoperative job requirement if their FCE-determined capability was greater than or equal to their preoperative job requirement. Patient characteristics were tested for association with meeting preoperative job requirement using bivariate and multivariate regression.
    Results: A total of 173 patients were identified: 71 (41.0%) and 102 (59.0%) underwent TLIF and ACDF, respectively. Of the 71 TLIF and 102 ACDF patients, 41 (58%) and 50 (49%) had light postoperative capabilities, 18 (25%) and 38 (37%) as medium, and 12 (17%) and 14 (14%) as heavy, respectively. Postoperatively, 26 (37%) of TLIF and 55 (54%) of ACDF patients were categorized as meeting their preoperative job requirement. Independent predictors of meeting preoperative job requirement following TLIF (P =0.002) and ACDF (P = 0.037) were lower preoperative job requirement, and younger age for ACDF (P < 0.001).
    Conclusion: Only one in five patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery for occupational injuries is able to perform heavy-duty work postoperatively. Similarly, approximately half of patients are able to perform medium-duty work. Moreover, a majority of patients are unable to return to their preoperative occupational responsibilities. These findings can be used to council patients regarding their likelihood of meeting postoperative work capacity.
    Level of evidence: 3.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/trends ; Occupational Injuries/diagnosis ; Occupational Injuries/surgery ; Postoperative Care/methods ; Postoperative Care/trends ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion/trends ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-01-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 752024-4
    ISSN 1528-1159 ; 0362-2436
    ISSN (online) 1528-1159
    ISSN 0362-2436
    DOI 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001457
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

    In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

    Zs.A 1305: Show issues Location:
    Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
    bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
    Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
    ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

To top