LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Exploratory study: Evaluation of a symptom checker effectiveness for providing a diagnosis and evaluating the situation emergency compared to emergency physicians using simulated and standardized patients.

Abensur Vuillaume, Laure / Turpinier, Julien / Cipolat, Lauriane / Arnaud-Dépil-Duval / Dumontier, Thomas / Peschanski, Nicolas / Kieffer, Yann / Barbat, Boris / Riquier, Thomas / Dinot, Vincent / Galland, Joris

PloS one

2023  Volume 18, Issue 2, Page(s) e0277568

Abstract: Background: The overloading of health care systems is an international problem. In this context, new tools such as symptom checker (SC) are emerging to improve patient orientation and triage. This SC should be rigorously evaluated and we can take a cue ... ...

Abstract Background: The overloading of health care systems is an international problem. In this context, new tools such as symptom checker (SC) are emerging to improve patient orientation and triage. This SC should be rigorously evaluated and we can take a cue from the way we evaluate medical students, using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) with simulated patients.
Objective: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of a symptom checker versus emergency physicians using OSCEs as an assessment method.
Methods: We explored a method to evaluate the ability to set a diagnosis and evaluate the emergency of a situation with simulation. A panel of medical experts wrote 220 simulated patients cases. Each situation was played twice by an actor trained to the role: once for the SC, then for an emergency physician. Like a teleconsultation, only the patient's voice was accessible. We performed a prospective non-inferiority study. If primary analysis had failed to detect non-inferiority, we have planned a superiority analysis.
Results: The SC established only 30% of the main diagnosis as the emergency physician found 81% of these. The emergency physician was also superior compared to the SC in the suggestion of secondary diagnosis (92% versus 52%). In the matter of patient triage (vital emergency or not), there is still a medical superiority (96% versus 71%). We prove a non-inferiority of the SC compared to the physician in terms of interviewing time.
Conclusions and relevance: We should use simulated patients instead of clinical cases in order to evaluate the effectiveness of SCs.
MeSH term(s) Humans ; Prospective Studies ; Triage/methods ; Physicians ; Voice ; Remote Consultation
Language English
Publishing date 2023-02-24
Publishing country United States
Document type Journal Article
ZDB-ID 2267670-3
ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
ISSN (online) 1932-6203
ISSN 1932-6203
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0277568
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top