LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Canadians' knowledge of cancer risk factors and belief in cancer myths.

E, Rydz / J, Telfer / Ek, Quinn / Ss, Fazel / E, Holmes / G, Pennycook / Ce, Peters

BMC public health

2024  Volume 24, Issue 1, Page(s) 329

Abstract: Background: Many untrue statements about cancer prevention and risks are circulating. The objective of this study was to assess Canadians' awareness of known cancer risk factors and cancer myths (untruths or statements that are not completely true), and ...

Abstract Background: Many untrue statements about cancer prevention and risks are circulating. The objective of this study was to assess Canadians' awareness of known cancer risk factors and cancer myths (untruths or statements that are not completely true), and to explore how awareness may vary by sociodemographic and cognitive factors.
Methods: Cancer myths were identified by conducting scans of published, grey literature, and social media. Intuitive-analytic thinking disposition scores included were actively open- and close-minded thinking, as well as preference for intuitive and effortful thinking. A survey was administered online to participants aged 18 years and older through Prolific. Results were summarized descriptively and analyzed using chi-square tests, as well as Spearman rank and Pearson correlations.
Results: Responses from 734 Canadians were received. Participants were better at identifying known cancer risk factors (70% of known risks) compared to cancer myths (49%). Bivariate analyses showed differential awareness of known cancer risk factors (p < 0.05) by population density and income, cancer myths by province, and for both by ethnicity, age, and all thinking disposition scores. Active open-minded thinking and preference for effortful thinking were associated with greater discernment. Tobacco-related risk factors were well-identified (> 90% correctly identified), but recognition of other known risk factors was poor (as low as 23% for low vegetable and fruit intake). Mythical cancer risk factors with high support were consuming additives (61%), feeling stressed (52%), and consuming artificial sweeteners (49%). High uncertainty of causation was observed for glyphosate (66% neither agreed or disagreed). For factors that reduce cancer risk, reasonable awareness was observed for HPV vaccination (60%), but there was a high prevalence in cancer myths, particularly that consuming antioxidants (65%) and organic foods (45%) are protective, and some uncertainty whether drinking red wine (41%), consuming vitamins (32%), and smoking cannabis (30%) reduces cancer risk.
Conclusions: While Canadians were able to identify tobacco-related cancer risk factors, many myths were believed and numerous risk factors were not recognized. Cancer myths can be harmful in themselves and can detract the public's attention from and action on established risk factors.
MeSH term(s) Humans ; Canada/epidemiology ; Neoplasms/epidemiology ; Neoplasms/etiology ; North American People ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Language English
Publishing date 2024-01-30
Publishing country England
Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ZDB-ID 2041338-5
ISSN 1471-2458 ; 1471-2458
ISSN (online) 1471-2458
ISSN 1471-2458
DOI 10.1186/s12889-024-17832-3
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top