Article ; Online: Comparison of open versus minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar metastases.
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
2022 Volume 108, Issue 4, Page(s) 103274
Abstract: Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been developed for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal metastases to reduce the morbidity associated with the operation. The purpose of our study was to compare the mean length of ...
Abstract | Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been developed for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal metastases to reduce the morbidity associated with the operation. The purpose of our study was to compare the mean length of stay, change in pain levels, neurological symptoms, complications and survival after open versus MIS surgery. Material and methods: This is a single-center retrospective study based on a register of patients treated for vertebral metastases between January 2014 and October 2016. The collection included demographic data, cancer-related data, clinical data, the characteristics of the surgery, the length of stay, assessment of pain and the occurrence of death. These data were compared between open and MIS surgery groups. Results: Out of 59 patients, 35 were treated with open surgery and 24 were treated with MIS surgery. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender and body mass index. Breast, kidney, prostate and lung cancers were the most frequent primary tumors. Prognostic and instability scores were comparable. Short- and medium-term pain assessment showed comparable results. Median survival was 208 days in the open surgery group and 224days in the MIS group (p=0.5299). Conclusion: MIS techniques aim to limit the surgical approach and allow a faster introduction of adjuvant treatments than after open surgery. Our study did not find any differences between open and MIS surgery in terms of pain, neurological evolution or survival time in patients treated for thoracolumbar spinal metastases. Level of evidence: IV; retrospective study. |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Humans ; Male ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods ; Pain ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion/methods ; Spinal Neoplasms/secondary ; Spinal Neoplasms/surgery ; Treatment Outcome |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2022-03-21 |
Publishing country | France |
Document type | Journal Article |
ISSN | 1877-0568 |
ISSN (online) | 1877-0568 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103274 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.
Inter-library loan at ZB MED
Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.