Article ; Online: Carnoy solution versus GEWF solution for lymph node revealing in colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
International journal of colorectal disease
2019 Volume 34, Issue 12, Page(s) 2189–2193
Abstract: Purpose: This study aimed to compare the performance of two lymph node revealing solutions.: Methods: This randomized clinical trial (NTC02704988) investigated patients with colon or rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection with D2 ... ...
Abstract | Purpose: This study aimed to compare the performance of two lymph node revealing solutions. Methods: This randomized clinical trial (NTC02704988) investigated patients with colon or rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection with D2 lymphadenectomy. Specimens submitted for conventional pathological examination were randomly assigned for additional fixation with Carnoy or GEWF solution, and dissection was performed to examine the missed lymph nodes. The number of lymph nodes retrieved, additional identified metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node upstaging, and complementary indication of adjuvant therapy were investigated. Results: The number of lymph nodes retrieved was significantly higher with the use of lymph node revealing solutions than with the conventional method in colon cancer (GEWF: 29.5 vs 27; p < 0.001; Carnoy: 27.7 vs 25.2; p < 0.001) and rectal cancer (GEWF: 25.8 vs 23.6; p < 0.001; Carnoy: 23.1 vs 20.8; p < 0.001). There were no differences between the solutions and conventional examination with respect to the median number of additional metastatic lymph nodes identified (0 in all arms), the number of patients with lymph node upstaging (colon cancer: 1 in the Carnoy arm, 0 in the GEWF arm; rectal cancer: 1 in the GEWF arm, 0 in the Carnoy arm), or the number of patients with complementary indication of adjuvant therapy (colon cancer: 1 in the Carnoy arm, 0 in the GEWF arm; rectal cancer: 0 in both arms). Conclusion: Despite the higher number of lymph nodes retrieved, neither solution resulted in significant changes in patient staging or treatment. Both solutions exhibited equal performance with respect to all outcomes. Trial registration: NTC02704988. |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Acetic Acid/chemistry ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Chloroform/chemistry ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Ethanol/chemistry ; Female ; Fixatives/chemistry ; Formaldehyde/chemistry ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes/pathology ; Lymph Nodes/surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Solutions/chemistry ; Tissue Fixation/methods ; Treatment Outcome |
Chemical Substances | Carnoy's solution ; Fixatives ; Solutions ; gewf solution ; Formaldehyde (1HG84L3525) ; Ethanol (3K9958V90M) ; Chloroform (7V31YC746X) ; Acetic Acid (Q40Q9N063P) |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2019-11-15 |
Publishing country | Germany |
Document type | Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial |
ZDB-ID | 84975-3 |
ISSN | 1432-1262 ; 0179-1958 |
ISSN (online) | 1432-1262 |
ISSN | 0179-1958 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00384-019-03437-5 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
Full text online
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
Zs.A 2121: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.