LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 140

Search options

  1. Book ; Online ; E-Book: Pragmatic randomized clinical trials

    Girman, Cynthia J. / Ritchey, Mary E. / Suarez, Elizabeth A.

    using primary data collection and electronic health records

    2021  

    Author's details edited by Cynthia J. Girman, Mary E. Ritchey ; assistant editor Elizabeth A. Suarez
    Keywords Electronic books
    Language English
    Size 1 Online-Ressource (xxii, 476 Seiten), Illustrationen, Diagramme
    Publisher Elsevier Academic Press
    Publishing place London
    Publishing country Great Britain
    Document type Book ; Online ; E-Book
    Remark Zugriff für angemeldete ZB MED-Nutzerinnen und -Nutzer
    HBZ-ID HT020902644
    ISBN 978-0-12-817664-1 ; 9780128176634 ; 0-12-817664-4 ; 0128176636
    Database ZB MED Catalogue: Medicine, Health, Nutrition, Environment, Agriculture

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Can Weight of Evidence, Quantitative Bias, and Bounding Methods Evaluate Robustness of Real-world Evidence for Regulator and Health Technology Assessment Decisions on Medical Interventions?

    Rosen, Emma M / Ritchey, Mary E / Girman, Cynthia J

    Clinical therapeutics

    2023  Volume 45, Issue 12, Page(s) 1266–1276

    Abstract: Purpose: High-quality evidence is crucial for health care intervention decision-making. These decisions frequently use nonrandomized data, which can be more vulnerable to biases than randomized trials. Accordingly, methods to quantify biases and weigh ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: High-quality evidence is crucial for health care intervention decision-making. These decisions frequently use nonrandomized data, which can be more vulnerable to biases than randomized trials. Accordingly, methods to quantify biases and weigh available evidence could elucidate the robustness of findings, giving regulators more confidence in making approval and reimbursement decisions.
    Methods: We conducted an integrative literature review to identify methods for determining probability of causation, evaluating weight of evidence, and conducting quantitative bias analysis as related to health care interventions. Eligible studies were published from 2012 to 2021, applicable to pharmacoepidemiology, and presented a method that met our objective.
    Findings: Twenty-two eligible studies were classified into 4 categories: (1) quantitative bias analysis; (2) weight of evidence methods; (3) Bayesian networks; and (4) miscellaneous. All of the methods have strengths, limitations, and situations in which they are more well suited than others. Some methods seem to lend themselves more to applications of health care evidence on medical interventions than others.
    Implications: To provide robust evidence for and improve confidence in regulatory or reimbursement decisions, we recommend applying multiple methods to triangulate associations of medical interventions, accounting for biases in different ways. This approach could lead to well-defined robustness assessments of study findings and appropriate science-driven decisions by regulators and payers for public health.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical ; Bayes Theorem ; Bias ; Delivery of Health Care
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-10-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 603113-4
    ISSN 1879-114X ; 0149-2918
    ISSN (online) 1879-114X
    ISSN 0149-2918
    DOI 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.09.010
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Characterizing Imbalance in the Tails of the Propensity Score Distribution.

    DiPrete, Bethany L / Girman, Cynthia J / Mavros, Panagiotis / Breskin, Alexander / Brookhart, M Alan

    American journal of epidemiology

    2024  Volume 193, Issue 2, Page(s) 389–403

    Abstract: Understanding characteristics of patients with propensity scores in the tails of the propensity score (PS) distribution has relevance for inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted and PS-based estimation in observational studies. Here we outline a method ...

    Abstract Understanding characteristics of patients with propensity scores in the tails of the propensity score (PS) distribution has relevance for inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted and PS-based estimation in observational studies. Here we outline a method for identifying variables most responsible for extreme propensity scores. The approach is illustrated in 3 scenarios: 1) a plasmode simulation of adult patients in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2011-2015) and 2) timing of dexamethasone initiation and 3) timing of remdesivir initiation in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 from February 2020 through January 2021. PS models were fitted using relevant baseline covariates, and tails of the PS distribution were defined using asymmetric first and 99th percentiles. After fitting of the PS model in each original data set, values of each key covariate were permuted and model-agnostic variable importance measures were examined. Visualization and variable importance techniques were helpful in identifying variables most responsible for extreme propensity scores and may help identify individual characteristics that might make patients inappropriate for inclusion in a study (e.g., off-label use). Subsetting or restricting the study sample based on variables identified using this approach may help investigators avoid the need for trimming or overlap weights in studies.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Propensity Score ; Computer Simulation
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2937-3
    ISSN 1476-6256 ; 0002-9262
    ISSN (online) 1476-6256
    ISSN 0002-9262
    DOI 10.1093/aje/kwad200
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Risk of acute pancreatitis among new users of empagliflozin compared to sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes: A post-authorization safety study.

    Fazeli Farsani, Soulmaz / Iglay, Kristy / Zhang, Ling / Niyonkuru, Christian / Nessralla, Laurieann / Girman, Cynthia J

    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety

    2024  Volume 33, Issue 5, Page(s) e5800

    Abstract: Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the potential risk of acute pancreatitis with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) newly initiating empagliflozin.: Methods: Data from two large US claims databases were analyzed in an ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the potential risk of acute pancreatitis with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) newly initiating empagliflozin.
    Methods: Data from two large US claims databases were analyzed in an observational study of patients with T2D receiving metformin who were newly prescribed empagliflozin versus sulfonylurea (SU). Because dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been associated with the risk of acute pancreatitis in some studies, patients on these agents were excluded. Using pooled analyses of data from the two databases (2014-2021), patients initiating empagliflozin were matched 1:1 within database to patients initiating SU using propensity scores (PS) that incorporated relevant demographic and clinical characteristics. Prespecified sensitivity analyses were performed for design parameters.
    Results: The analyses identified 72 661 new users of empagliflozin and 422 018 new users of SUs, with both patient groups on concurrent metformin therapy. Baseline characteristics within treatment groups appeared to be similar across the 72 621 matched pairs. After mean follow-up of ~6 months, incidence rates of acute pancreatitis in the pooled matched cohort were 10.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.29-11.39) events per 1000 patient-years (PY) for empagliflozin and 11.65 (95% CI 10.59-12.77) events per 1000 PY for SUs. On a background of metformin, patients newly initiating empagliflozin did not have an increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared with those initiating an SU (pooled PS matched hazard ratio 0.88 [0.76-1.02]) across 75621.42 PY of follow-up.
    Conclusions: The results of this voluntary post-approval safety study provide additional evidence that the use of empagliflozin for the treatment of T2D is not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Benzhydryl Compounds/adverse effects ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology ; Pancreatitis/chemically induced ; Pancreatitis/epidemiology ; Glucosides/adverse effects ; Glucosides/therapeutic use ; Glucosides/administration & dosage ; Sulfonylurea Compounds/adverse effects ; Sulfonylurea Compounds/therapeutic use ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Metformin/adverse effects ; Metformin/administration & dosage ; Metformin/therapeutic use ; Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects ; Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage ; Databases, Factual ; Incidence ; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing/statistics & numerical data ; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects ; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Adult ; United States/epidemiology ; Propensity Score
    Chemical Substances empagliflozin (HDC1R2M35U) ; Benzhydryl Compounds ; Glucosides ; Sulfonylurea Compounds ; Metformin (9100L32L2N) ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-05-08
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Observational Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Comparative Study
    ZDB-ID 1099748-9
    ISSN 1099-1557 ; 1053-8569
    ISSN (online) 1099-1557
    ISSN 1053-8569
    DOI 10.1002/pds.5800
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Real-world data: Assessing electronic health records and medical claims data to support regulatory decision-making for drug and biological products.

    Girman, Cynthia J / Ritchey, Mary E / Lo Re, Vincent

    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety

    2022  Volume 31, Issue 7, Page(s) 717–720

    MeSH term(s) Biological Products/adverse effects ; Databases, Factual ; Decision Making ; Electronic Health Records ; Humans
    Chemical Substances Biological Products
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-05-03
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1099748-9
    ISSN 1099-1557 ; 1053-8569
    ISSN (online) 1099-1557
    ISSN 1053-8569
    DOI 10.1002/pds.5444
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Evaluating the Feasibility of Electronic Health Records and Claims Data Sources for Specific Research Purposes.

    Ritchey, Mary E / Girman, Cynthia J

    Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science

    2020  Volume 54, Issue 6, Page(s) 1296–1302

    Abstract: Data collected in real-world clinical settings are increasingly being used to evaluate therapeutic options. While in its infancy for research assessing effectiveness, especially comparative effectiveness in the regulatory environment, electronic health ... ...

    Abstract Data collected in real-world clinical settings are increasingly being used to evaluate therapeutic options. While in its infancy for research assessing effectiveness, especially comparative effectiveness in the regulatory environment, electronic health records (EHR) and administrative insurance claims data are used extensively by both manufacturers and regulators to evaluate post-marketing safety of products in the real world. The feasibility of using these data for analysis in a research study depends on the specific research question and the availability, quality and relevance of the collected data to address the scientific question. It is unlikely that any specific database could be 'qualified' for use across all research questions, even within a specific therapeutic area, due to dependence of feasibility on the elements of the specific research question. This paper describes considerations for determining whether EHR or claims data can be used for specific research purposes. A new structured approach for assessing the feasibility of these data in research is proposed. The framework builds on and considers whether each element of the PICOTS framework for well-structured research questions is adequately captured to allow for viable reliance on EHR and claims data for that specific scientific question. Practical examples and discussion of the limitations of RWD for research are given along with approaches for interpretation of analyses using RWD.
    MeSH term(s) Data Collection ; Electronic Health Records ; Feasibility Studies ; Information Storage and Retrieval
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-07
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2708397-4
    ISSN 2168-4804 ; 2168-4790
    ISSN (online) 2168-4804
    ISSN 2168-4790
    DOI 10.1007/s43441-020-00139-x
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Clarifying the causal contrast: An empirical example applying the prevalent new user study design.

    Young, Jessica C / Webster-Clark, Michael / Shmuel, Shahar / Garry, Elizabeth M / Mavros, Panagiotis / Stürmer, Til / Girman, Cynthia J

    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety

    2024  Volume 33, Issue 4, Page(s) e5790

    Abstract: Purpose: The prevalent new user design extends the active comparator new user design to include patients switching to a treatment of interest from a comparator. We examined the impact of adding "switchers" to incident new users on the estimated hazard ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: The prevalent new user design extends the active comparator new user design to include patients switching to a treatment of interest from a comparator. We examined the impact of adding "switchers" to incident new users on the estimated hazard ratio (HR) of hospitalized heart failure.
    Methods: Using MarketScan claims data (2000-2014), we estimated HRs of hospitalized heart failure between patients initiating GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and sulfonylureas (SU). We considered three estimands: (1) the effect of incident new use; (2) the effect of switching; and (3) the effect of incident new use or switching, combining the two population. We used time-conditional propensity scores (TCPS) and time-stratified standardized morbidity ratio (SMR) weighting to adjust for confounding.
    Results: We identified 76 179 GLP-1 RA new users, of which 12% were direct switchers (within 30 days) from SU. Among incident new users, GLP-1 RA was protective against heart failure (adjHR
    Conclusions: When analyses were conducted only among incident new users, GLP-1 RA had a protective effect. However, among switchers from SU to GLP-1 RA, the effect estimates substantially shifted toward the null. Combining patients with varying treatment histories can result in poor confounding control and camouflage important heterogeneity.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology ; Sulfonylurea Compounds/therapeutic use ; Risk Factors ; Heart Failure/drug therapy ; Heart Failure/epidemiology ; Heart Failure/chemically induced ; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/agonists ; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor ; Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use
    Chemical Substances Sulfonylurea Compounds ; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (89750-14-1) ; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor ; Hypoglycemic Agents
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-04-04
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1099748-9
    ISSN 1099-1557 ; 1053-8569
    ISSN (online) 1099-1557
    ISSN 1053-8569
    DOI 10.1002/pds.5790
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Randomization versus Real-World Evidence.

    Winterstein, Almut G / Girman, Cynthia J / Pottegård, Anton

    The New England journal of medicine

    2020  Volume 383, Issue 4, Page(s) e21

    MeSH term(s) Random Allocation ; Research Design
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-07-23
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 207154-x
    ISSN 1533-4406 ; 0028-4793
    ISSN (online) 1533-4406
    ISSN 0028-4793
    DOI 10.1056/NEJMc2020020
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Risk of bias in non-randomized observational studies assessing the relationship between proton-pump inhibitors and adverse kidney outcomes: a systematic review.

    Rajan, Pradeep / Iglay, Kristy / Rhodes, Thomas / Girman, Cynthia J / Bennett, Dimitri / Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar

    Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology

    2022  Volume 15, Page(s) 17562848221074183

    Abstract: Background: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed as acid-suppression therapy. Some observational studies suggest that long-term use of PPIs is potentially associated with certain adverse kidney outcomes. We conducted a systematic ... ...

    Abstract Background: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed as acid-suppression therapy. Some observational studies suggest that long-term use of PPIs is potentially associated with certain adverse kidney outcomes. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess potential bias in non-randomized studies reporting on putative associations between PPIs and adverse kidney outcomes (acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, chronic interstitial nephritis, acute tubular necrosis, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease).
    Methods: We searched the medical literature within 10 years of 17 December 2020. Pre-specified criteria guided identification of relevant English language articles for assessment. Risk of bias on an outcome-specific basis was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool by two independent reviewers.
    Results: Of 620 initially identified records, 26 studies met
    Conclusion: Using ROBINS-I, we found that non-randomized observational studies suggesting kidney harm by PPIs have moderate to serious risk of bias, making it challenging to establish causality. Additional high-quality, real-world evidence among generalizable populations are needed to better understand the relation between PPI treatment and acute and chronic kidney outcomes, accounting for the effects of varying durations of PPI treatment, self-treatment with over-the-counter PPIs, and potential critical confounders.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-10
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2440710-0
    ISSN 1756-2848 ; 1756-283X
    ISSN (online) 1756-2848
    ISSN 1756-283X
    DOI 10.1177/17562848221074183
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Treatment patterns and burden of myelosuppression for patients with small cell lung cancer: A SEER-medicare study.

    Epstein, Robert S / Nelms, Jerrod / Moran, Donald / Girman, Cynthia / Huang, Huan / Chioda, Marc

    Cancer treatment and research communications

    2022  Volume 31, Page(s) 100555

    Abstract: Purpose: To depict the treatment journey for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and evaluate health care resource utilization (HCRU) associated with myelosuppression, a complication induced by chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiation therapy. ...

    Abstract Purpose: To depict the treatment journey for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and evaluate health care resource utilization (HCRU) associated with myelosuppression, a complication induced by chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiation therapy.
    Patients and methods: This was a descriptive, retrospective study of patients with SCLC aged ≥65 years, identified from linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data curated between January 2012 and December 2015. Treatment types (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery) were classified as first, second, or third line, depending on the temporal sequence in which regimens were prescribed. For each year, the proportions of patients completing 4- or 6-cycle chemotherapy regimens, with hospital admissions associated with myelosuppression, or who used granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), blood/platelet transfusions, or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), were calculated.
    Results: Chemotherapy was administered as initial treatment in 7,807/11,907 (65.6%) patients whose treatment journey was recorded. Approximately one-third (n = 3,985) subsequently received radiation therapy. In total, 5,791 (57.8%) patients completed the guideline-recommended 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Among all chemotherapy-treated patients, 10,370 (74.3%) experienced ≥1 inpatient admission associated with myelosuppression (anemia, 7,366 [52.8%]; neutropenia, 4,642 [33.3%]; thrombocytopenia, 2,375 [17.0%]; pancytopenia, 1,983 [14.2%]). Supportive care interventions included G-CSF (6,756 [48.4%] patients), ESAs (1,534 [11.0%]), and transfusions (3,674 [26.3%]).
    Conclusion: Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of care for patients with SCLC. Slightly over half of patients completed the recommended number of cycles, underscoring the frailty of patients and aggressiveness of SCLC. HCRU associated with myelosuppression was prominent, suggesting a substantial burden on older patients with SCLC.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/adverse effects ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Medicare ; Neutropenia/chemically induced ; Neutropenia/drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy ; United States/epidemiology
    Chemical Substances Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (143011-72-7)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-04
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ISSN 2468-2942
    ISSN (online) 2468-2942
    DOI 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100555
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top