LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 175

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Minimally invasive oesophagectomy as standard of care.

    Noordman, Bo J / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    The British journal of surgery

    2023  Volume 110, Issue 9, Page(s) 1118–1119

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Esophagectomy ; Standard of Care ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery ; Postoperative Complications/surgery ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Laparoscopy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-07-12
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2985-3
    ISSN 1365-2168 ; 0263-1202 ; 0007-1323 ; 1355-7688
    ISSN (online) 1365-2168
    ISSN 0263-1202 ; 0007-1323 ; 1355-7688
    DOI 10.1093/bjs/znad209
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: History and evidence for state of the art of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer surgery.

    Schuring, Nannet / van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus

    2023  Volume 37, Issue 4

    Abstract: The current curative multimodal treatment of advanced esophageal cancers consists of neoadjuvant or perioperative chemo(radio)therapy followed by a radical surgical resection of the primary tumor and a 2- or 3-field lymphadenectomy. One of the most ... ...

    Abstract The current curative multimodal treatment of advanced esophageal cancers consists of neoadjuvant or perioperative chemo(radio)therapy followed by a radical surgical resection of the primary tumor and a 2- or 3-field lymphadenectomy. One of the most important predictors of long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients is lymph node involvement. The distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer is unpredictable and depends on the primary tumor location, histology, T-stage and application of neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment. The optimal extent of the lymphadenectomy remains controversial; there is no global consensus on this topic yet. Some surgeons advocate an aggressive and extended lymph node dissection to remove occult metastatic disease, to optimize oncological outcomes. Others promote a more restricted lymphadenectomy, since the benefit of an extended lymphadenectomy, especially after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, has not been clearly demonstrated, and morbidity may be reduced. In this review, we describe the development of lymphadenectomy, followed by a summary of current evidence for lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer treatment.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Esophagectomy ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes/surgery ; Lymph Nodes/pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Review ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 639470-x
    ISSN 1442-2050 ; 1120-8694
    ISSN (online) 1442-2050
    ISSN 1120-8694
    DOI 10.1093/dote/doad065
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery: an international consensus-based update of a quality measure.

    Kalff, Marianne C / van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus

    2021  Volume 34, Issue 7

    Abstract: Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery is a composite quality measure including 10 short-term surgical outcomes reflecting an uneventful perioperative course. Achieved textbook outcome is associated with improved long-term survival. This study ... ...

    Abstract Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery is a composite quality measure including 10 short-term surgical outcomes reflecting an uneventful perioperative course. Achieved textbook outcome is associated with improved long-term survival. This study aimed to update the original textbook outcome based on international consensus. Forty-five international expert esophageal cancer surgeons received a personal invitation to evaluate the 10 items in the original textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery and to rate 18 additional items divided over seven subcategories for their importance in the updated textbook outcome. Items were included in the updated textbook outcome if ≥80% of the respondents agreed on inclusion. In case multiple items within one subcategory reached ≥80% agreement, only the most inclusive item with the highest agreement rate was included. With a response rate of 80%, 36 expert esophageal cancer surgeons, from 34 hospitals, 16 countries, and 4 continents responded to this international survey. Based on the inclusion criteria, the updated quality indicator 'textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery' should consist of: tumor-negative resection margins, ≥20 lymph nodes retrieved and examined, no intraoperative complication, no complications Clavien-Dindo ≥III, no ICU/MCU readmission, no readmission related to the surgical procedure, no anastomotic leakage, no hospital stay ≥14 days, and no in-hospital mortality. This study resulted in an international consensus-based update of a quality measure, textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery. This updated textbook outcome should be implemented in quality assurance programs for centers performing esophageal cancer surgery, and could standardize quality measures used internationally.
    MeSH term(s) Consensus ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery ; Esophagectomy ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-03-17
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 639470-x
    ISSN 1442-2050 ; 1120-8694
    ISSN (online) 1442-2050
    ISSN 1120-8694
    DOI 10.1093/dote/doab011
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.

    Slaman, Annelijn E / Eshuis, Wietse J / van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus

    2022  

    Abstract: Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy has serious consequences. In Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a shorter and possibly better vascularized gastric conduit is created than in McKeown esophagectomy. Intrathoracic anastomoses can additionally be wrapped in ... ...

    Abstract Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy has serious consequences. In Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a shorter and possibly better vascularized gastric conduit is created than in McKeown esophagectomy. Intrathoracic anastomoses can additionally be wrapped in omentum and concealed behind the pleura ("flap and wrap" reconstruction). Aims of this observational study were to assess the anastomotic leakage incidence after transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), McKeown esophagectomy (McKeown), Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (IL) without "flap and wrap" reconstruction, and IL with "flap and wrap" reconstruction. Consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy at a tertiary referral center between January 2013 and April 2019 were included. Primary outcome was the anastomotic leakage rate. Secondary outcomes were postoperative outcomes, mortality, and 3-year overall survival. A total of 463 patients were included. The anastomotic leakage incidence after THE (n = 37), McKeown (n = 97), IL without "flap and wrap" reconstruction (n = 39), and IL with "flap and wrap" reconstruction (n = 290) were 24.3, 32.0, 28.2, and 7.2% (P < 0.001). THE and IL with "flap and wrap" reconstruction required fewer reoperations for anastomotic leakage (0 and 1.4%) than McKeown and IL without "flap and wrap" reconstruction (6.2 and 17.9%, P < 0.001). Fewer anastomotic leakages are observed after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with "flap and wrap" reconstruction compared to transhiatal, McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy without "flap and wrap" reconstruction. The "flap and wrap" reconstruction seems a promising technique to further reduce anastomotic leakages and its severity in esophageal cancer patients who have an indication for Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-06-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 639470-x
    ISSN 1442-2050 ; 1120-8694
    ISSN (online) 1442-2050
    ISSN 1120-8694
    DOI 10.1093/dote/doac036
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: C-Reactive Protein as a Negative Predictive Marker for Anastomotic Leakage After Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery.

    Hagens, Eliza R C / Feenstra, Minke L / Lam, Wing C / Eshuis, W J / Lameris, W / van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    World journal of surgery

    2023  Volume 47, Issue 8, Page(s) 1995–2002

    Abstract: Background: Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is commonly used by surgeons to raise suspicion of anastomotic leakage and other infectious complications, but most studies on optimal cut-off values are retrospective with a small sample of patients. The aim ... ...

    Abstract Background: Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is commonly used by surgeons to raise suspicion of anastomotic leakage and other infectious complications, but most studies on optimal cut-off values are retrospective with a small sample of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and optimal cut-off value of CRP for anastomotic leakage in patients following esophagectomy for cancer.
    Materials and methods: Consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients was included in this prospective study. Anastomotic leakage was confirmed if a defect or leakage of oral contrast was seen on a CT scan, by endoscopy or if saliva was draining from the neck incision. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP was assessed by receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. Youden's index was adopted to determine the cut-off value.
    Results: A total of 200 patients were included between 2016 and 2018. Postoperative day 5 showed the highest area under the ROC (0.825) and optimal cut-off value of 120 mg/L. This resulted in a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 82%, negative predicting value of 97%, and positive predicting value of 32%.
    Conclusions: CRP on postoperative day 5 can be used as a negative predictor for and can be used as a marker to raise suspicion of anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. When CRP exceeds 120 mg/L on postoperative day 5, additional investigations should be considered.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/diagnosis ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology ; Anastomotic Leak/surgery ; C-Reactive Protein/analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Prospective Studies ; Esophagectomy/adverse effects ; Esophagectomy/methods ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; ROC Curve
    Chemical Substances C-Reactive Protein (9007-41-4)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-04-27
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 224043-9
    ISSN 1432-2323 ; 0364-2313
    ISSN (online) 1432-2323
    ISSN 0364-2313
    DOI 10.1007/s00268-023-07013-5
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon.

    Hagens, Eliza R C / Cui, Nanke / van Dieren, Susan / Eshuis, Wietse J / Laméris, Wytze / van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    Annals of surgical oncology

    2023  Volume 30, Issue 8, Page(s) 5159–5169

    Abstract: Background: Numerous prediction models estimating the risk of complications after esophagectomy exist but are rarely used in practice. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical judgment of surgeons using these prediction models.: Methods: ... ...

    Abstract Background: Numerous prediction models estimating the risk of complications after esophagectomy exist but are rarely used in practice. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical judgment of surgeons using these prediction models.
    Methods: Patients with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent an esophagectomy were included in this prospective study. Prediction models for postoperative complications after esophagectomy were selected by a systematic literature search. Clinical judgment was given by three surgeons, indicating their estimated risk for postoperative complications in percentage categories. The best performing prediction model was compared with the judgment of the surgeons, using the net reclassification improvement (NRI), category-free NRI (cfNRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indexes.
    Results: Overall, 159 patients were included between March 2019 and July 2021, of whom 88 patients (55%) developed a complication. The best performing prediction model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.56. The three surgeons had an AUC of 0.53, 0.55, and 0.59, respectively, and all surgeons showed negative percentages of cfNRI
    Conclusion: Prediction models tend to overestimate the risk of any complication, whereas surgeons tend to underestimate this risk. Overall, surgeons' estimations differ between surgeons and vary between similar to slightly better than the prediction models.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Risk Assessment ; Prospective Studies ; Judgment ; Surgeons ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery ; Risk Factors
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-04-29
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1200469-8
    ISSN 1534-4681 ; 1068-9265
    ISSN (online) 1534-4681
    ISSN 1068-9265
    DOI 10.1245/s10434-023-13473-9
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage after upper gastrointestinal surgery.

    Pattynama, Lisanne M D / Pouw, Roos E / Henegouwen, Mark I van Berge / Daams, Freek / Gisbertz, Suzanne S / Bergman, Jacques J G H M / Eshuis, Wietse J

    Endoscopy

    2023  Volume 55, Issue 11, Page(s) 1019–1025

    Abstract: Background: Recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) was introduced as treatment for anastomotic leakage after upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the initial experience with EVT for anastomotic leakage after ... ...

    Abstract Background: Recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) was introduced as treatment for anastomotic leakage after upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the initial experience with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery in a tertiary referral center.
    Methods: Patients treated with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery were included retrospectively (January 2018-June 2021) and prospectively (June 2021-October 2021). The primary end point was the EVT success rate. Secondary end points included mortality and adverse events.
    Results: 38 patients were included (31 men; mean age 66 years): 27 had undergone an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and 11 a total gastrectomy with esophagojejunal anastomosis. EVT was successful in 28 patients (74 %, 95 %CI 57 %-87 %). In 10 patients, EVT failed: deceased owing to radiation pneumonitis (n = 1), EVT-associated complications (n = 2), and defect closure not achieved (n = 7). Mean duration of successful EVT was 33 days, with a median of six EVT-related endoscopies. Median hospital stay was 45 days.
    Conclusion: This initial experience with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery demonstrated a success rate of 74 %. EVT is a promising therapy that could prevent further major surgery. More experience with the technique and its indications will likely improve success rates in the future.
    MeSH term(s) Male ; Humans ; Aged ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology ; Anastomotic Leak/surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods ; Endoscopy/adverse effects ; Gastrectomy/adverse effects ; Esophagectomy/adverse effects
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-05-30
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Clinical Trial ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 80120-3
    ISSN 1438-8812 ; 0013-726X
    ISSN (online) 1438-8812
    ISSN 0013-726X
    DOI 10.1055/a-2102-1691
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Recurrence and Survival after Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer - A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.

    Henckens, Sofie Pg / Schuring, Nannet / Elliott, Jessie A / Johar, Asif / Markar, Sheraz R / Gantxegi, Amaia / Lagergren, Pernilla / Hanna, George B / Pera, Manuel / Reynolds, John V / van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    Annals of surgery

    2024  

    Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of operative approach (open [OE], hybrid [HMIE] and total minimally invasive esophagectomy [TMIE]) on operative and oncologic outcomes for patients treated with curative intent for esophageal ... ...

    Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of operative approach (open [OE], hybrid [HMIE] and total minimally invasive esophagectomy [TMIE]) on operative and oncologic outcomes for patients treated with curative intent for esophageal and junctional cancer.
    Summary background data: The optimum oncologic surgical approach to esophageal and junctional cancer is unclear.
    Methods: This secondary analysis of the European multicenter ENSURE study includes patients undergoing curative-intent esophagectomy for cancer between 2009-2015 across 20 high-volume centers. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and the incidence and location of disease recurrence. Secondary endpoints included among others R0 resection rate, lymph node yield and overall survival (OS).
    Results: In total, 3,199 patients were included. Of these, 55% underwent OE, 17% HMIE and 29% TMIE. DFS was independently increased post TMIE (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.98], P=0.022) compared with OE. Multivariable regression demonstrated no difference in absolute locoregional recurrence risk according to operative approach (HMIE vs. OE OR 0.79, P=0.257, TMIE vs. OE OR 0.84, P=0.243). The probability of systemic recurrence was independently increased post HMIE (OR 2.07, P=0.031), but not TMIE (OR 0.86, P=0.508). R0 resection rates (P=0.005) and nodal yield (P<0.001) were independently increased after TMIE, but not HMIE (P=0.424; P=0.512) compared with OE. OS was independently improved following both HMIE (HR 0.79, P=0.009) and TMIE (HR 0.82, P=0.003) as compared with OE.
    Conclusion: In this European multicenter study, TMIE was associated with improved surgical quality and DFS, while both TMIE and HMIE were associated with improved OS as compared with OE for esophageal cancer.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-04-05
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 340-2
    ISSN 1528-1140 ; 0003-4932
    ISSN (online) 1528-1140
    ISSN 0003-4932
    DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006280
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery: A Systematic Review.

    Hagens, Eliza R C / van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    Cancers

    2020  Volume 12, Issue 6

    Abstract: Metastatic lymphatic mapping in esophageal cancer is important to determine the optimal extent of the radiation field in case of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lymphadenectomy when esophagectomy is indicated. The objective of this review is to ... ...

    Abstract Metastatic lymphatic mapping in esophageal cancer is important to determine the optimal extent of the radiation field in case of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lymphadenectomy when esophagectomy is indicated. The objective of this review is to identify the distribution pattern of metastatic lymphatic spread in relation to histology, tumor location, and T-stage in patients with esophageal cancer. Embase and Medline databases were searched by two independent researchers. Studies were included if published before July 2019 and if a transthoracic esophagectomy with a complete 2- or 3-field lymphadenectomy was performed without neoadjuvant therapy. The prevalence of lymph node metastases was described per histologic subtype and primary tumor location. Fourteen studies were included in this review with a total of 8952 patients. We found that both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma metastasize to cervical, thoracic, and abdominal lymph node stations, regardless of the primary tumor location. In patients with an upper, middle, and lower thoracic squamous cell carcinoma, the lymph nodes along the right recurrent nerve are often affected (34%, 24% and 10%, respectively). Few studies describe the metastatic pattern of adenocarcinoma. The current literature is heterogeneous in the classification and reporting of lymph node metastases. This complicates evidence-based strategies in neoadjuvant and surgical treatment.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-16
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2527080-1
    ISSN 2072-6694
    ISSN 2072-6694
    DOI 10.3390/cancers12061592
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: ASO Author Reflections: Postoperative Complications are not Associated with Decreased Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Following Esophagectomy for Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.

    Jezerskyte, Egle / van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I / Sprangers, Mirjam A G / Gisbertz, Suzanne S

    Annals of surgical oncology

    2021  Volume 28, Issue 12, Page(s) 7277–7278

    MeSH term(s) Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery ; Esophagectomy/adverse effects ; Esophagogastric Junction/surgery ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Quality of Life
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-06-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1200469-8
    ISSN 1534-4681 ; 1068-9265
    ISSN (online) 1534-4681
    ISSN 1068-9265
    DOI 10.1245/s10434-021-10234-4
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top