LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 43

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Application of the PANELVIEW instrument to evaluate the guideline development process of the German polytrauma guideline.

    Goossen, Käthe / Bieler, Dan / Weise, Alina / Nothacker, Monika / Flohé, Sascha / Pieper, Dawid

    European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

    2024  

    Abstract: Background: PANELVIEW is an instrument for evaluating the appropriateness of the process, methods, and outcome of guideline development and the satisfaction of the guideline group with these steps.: Objective: To evaluate the guideline development ... ...

    Abstract Background: PANELVIEW is an instrument for evaluating the appropriateness of the process, methods, and outcome of guideline development and the satisfaction of the guideline group with these steps.
    Objective: To evaluate the guideline development process of the German guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries ('German polytrauma guideline') from the perspective of the guideline group, and to identify areas where this process may be improved in the future.
    Methods: We administered PANELVIEW to the participants of the 2022 update of the German polytrauma guideline. All guideline group members, including delegates of participating medical societies, steering group members, authors of guideline chapters, the chair, and methodological lead, were invited to participate. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Comments received were categorised by domains/items of the tool.
    Results: After the first, second, and last consensus conference, the guideline group was invited via email to participate in a web-based survey. Response rates were 36% (n/N = 13/36), 40% (12/30), and 37% (20/54), respectively. The mean scores for items ranged between 5.1 and 6.9 on a scale from 1 (fully disagree) to 7 (fully agree). Items with mean scores below 6.0 were related to (1) administration, (2) consideration of patients' views, perspectives, values, and preferences, and (3) the discussion of research gaps and needs for future research.
    Conclusion: The PANELVIEW tool showed that the guideline group was satisfied with most aspects of the guideline development process. Areas for improvement of the process were identified. Strategies to improve response rates should be explored.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-21
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2275480-5
    ISSN 1863-9941 ; 1863-9933
    ISSN (online) 1863-9941
    ISSN 1863-9933
    DOI 10.1007/s00068-024-02470-6
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Full text online

    More links

    Kategorien

    In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

    Zs.A 1221: Show issues Location:
    Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
    bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
    Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
    ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
    Zs.MO 607: Show issues

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

  2. Article ; Online: Evidence-based health policy in Germany: lack of communication and coordination between academia and health authorities?

    Kugler, Charlotte Mareike / Perleth, Matthias / Mathes, Tim / Goossen, Kaethe / Pieper, Dawid

    Systematic reviews

    2023  Volume 12, Issue 1, Page(s) 36

    Abstract: Health-care decision making should consider the best available evidence, often in the form of systematic reviews (SRs). The number of existing SRs and their overlap make their identification and use difficult. Decision makers often rely on de novo SRs ... ...

    Abstract Health-care decision making should consider the best available evidence, often in the form of systematic reviews (SRs). The number of existing SRs and their overlap make their identification and use difficult. Decision makers often rely on de novo SRs instead of using existing SRs. We describe two cases of duplicate reviews (minimum volume threshold of total knee arthroplasties and lung cancer screening) and one case of duplicate primary data analysis (transcatheter aortic valve implantation). All cases have in common that unintended duplication of research occurred between health authorities and academia, demonstrating a lack of communication and coordination between them.It is important to note that academia and health authorities have different incentives. Academics are often measured by the number of peer-reviewed publications and grants awarded. In contrast, health authorities must comply with laws and are commissioned to deliver a specific report within a defined period of time. Most replication is currently unintended. A solution may be the collaboration of stakeholders commonly referred to as integrated knowledge translation (IKT). The IKT approach means that research is conducted in collaboration with the end users of the research. It requires active collaborations between researchers and decision-makers or knowledge users (clinicians, managers, policy makers) throughout the research process. Wherever cooperation is possible in spite of requirements for independence or confidentiality, legal regulations should facilitate and support collaborative approaches between academia and health authorities.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Translational Research, Biomedical ; Lung Neoplasms ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Health Policy ; Communication ; Germany
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-13
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2662257-9
    ISSN 2046-4053 ; 2046-4053
    ISSN (online) 2046-4053
    ISSN 2046-4053
    DOI 10.1186/s13643-023-02204-6
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

  3. Article ; Online: Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study.

    Goossen, Käthe / Hess, Simone / Lunny, Carole / Pieper, Dawid

    BMC medical research methodology

    2020  Volume 20, Issue 1, Page(s) 138

    Abstract: Background: When conducting an Overviews of Reviews on health-related topics, it is unclear which combination of bibliographic databases authors should use for searching for SRs. Our goal was to determine which databases included the most systematic ... ...

    Abstract Background: When conducting an Overviews of Reviews on health-related topics, it is unclear which combination of bibliographic databases authors should use for searching for SRs. Our goal was to determine which databases included the most systematic reviews and identify an optimal database combination for searching systematic reviews.
    Methods: A set of 86 Overviews of Reviews with 1219 included systematic reviews was extracted from a previous study. Inclusion of the systematic reviews was assessed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, and TRIP. The mean inclusion rate (% of included systematic reviews) and corresponding 95% confidence interval were calculated for each database individually, as well as for combinations of MEDLINE with each other database and reference checking.
    Results: Inclusion of systematic reviews was higher in MEDLINE than in any other single database (mean inclusion rate 89.7%; 95% confidence interval [89.0-90.3%]). Combined with reference checking, this value increased to 93.7% [93.2-94.2%]. The best combination of two databases plus reference checking consisted of MEDLINE and Epistemonikos (99.2% [99.0-99.3%]). Stratification by Health Technology Assessment reports (97.7% [96.5-98.9%]) vs. Cochrane Overviews (100.0%) vs. non-Cochrane Overviews (99.3% [99.1-99.4%]) showed that inclusion was only slightly lower for Health Technology Assessment reports. However, MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, and reference checking remained the best combination. Among the 10/1219 systematic reviews not identified by this combination, five were published as websites rather than journals, two were included in CINAHL and Embase, and one was included in the database ERIC.
    Conclusions: MEDLINE and Epistemonikos, complemented by reference checking of included studies, is the best database combination to identify systematic reviews on health-related topics.
    MeSH term(s) Databases, Bibliographic ; Databases, Factual ; Humans ; MEDLINE ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 1471-2288
    ISSN (online) 1471-2288
    DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-00983-3
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  4. Article ; Online: An adapted 'Ottawa' method allowed assessing the need to update topic areas within clinical practice guidelines.

    Goossen, Käthe / Bieler, Dan / Hess, Simone / Becker, Monika / Kalsen, Michael / Flohé, Sascha / Pieper, Dawid

    Journal of clinical epidemiology

    2022  Volume 150, Page(s) 1–11

    Abstract: Objectives: To adapt and evaluate a method for assessing the need to update guideline topic areas involving multiple recommendations.: Study design and setting: The 'Ottawa method' uses literature signals to determine changes in evidence that trigger ...

    Abstract Objectives: To adapt and evaluate a method for assessing the need to update guideline topic areas involving multiple recommendations.
    Study design and setting: The 'Ottawa method' uses literature signals to determine changes in evidence that trigger a need to update individual guideline questions. We adapted the Ottawa method to include a process for aggregating updating signals by topic area (e.g., resuscitation) and tested this method using the German guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries. This involved a focused systematic evaluation of current evidence to identify updating signals and classifying the need to update for each topic area. Then, we surveyed the guideline group online about the modified method.
    Results: We conducted focused literature searches for 37 topic areas and screened a mean of 97 abstracts per topic area in 2021. The need to update was high for eight (21.6%), intermediate for eight (21.6%), and low for 21 topic areas (56.8%) based on updating signals. The survey response rate was 56% (24/43). Most guideline group members (94%, 16/17 responders) would use the Ottawa method again but their comments identified some weaknesses.
    Conclusion: The modified Ottawa method is a suitable, efficient tool to generate evidence-based updating signals for guideline topic areas involving multiple recommendations. Further fine-tuning is recommended.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-06-14
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 639306-8
    ISSN 1878-5921 ; 0895-4356
    ISSN (online) 1878-5921
    ISSN 0895-4356
    DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.003
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Full text online

    More links

    Kategorien

    In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

    Uh III Zs.206: Show issues Location:
    Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
    bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
    ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

  5. Conference proceedings: Does a photography of the researcher on the invitation letter affect the recruitment rate? A study within a trial

    Prediger, Barbara / Könsgen, Nadja / Gooßen, Käthe / Pieper, Dawid

    2021  , Page(s) 21ebmV–6–01

    Event/congress 22. Jahrestagung des Deutschen Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin; Who cares? – EbM und Transformation im Gesundheitswesen; sine loco [digital]; Deutsches Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin e.V.; 2021
    Keywords Medizin, Gesundheit
    Publishing date 2021-02-23
    Publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf
    Document type Conference proceedings
    DOI 10.3205/21ebm029
    Database German Medical Science

    More links

    Kategorien

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  6. Conference proceedings: Does a photography of the researcher on the invitation letter affect the recruitment rate? A study within a trial

    Prediger, Barbara / Könsgen, Nadja / Goossen, Käthe / Pieper, Dawid

    2021  , Page(s) 21dkvf317

    Event/congress 20. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung (DKVF); sine loco [digital]; Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung; 2021
    Keywords Medizin, Gesundheit
    Publishing date 2021-09-27
    Publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf
    Document type Conference proceedings
    DOI 10.3205/21dkvf317
    Database German Medical Science

    More links

    Kategorien

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  7. Conference proceedings: Evidenzinformierte Gesundheitspolitik in Deutschland: Ein Mangel an Kommunikation und Koordination zwischen akademischer Forschung und Institutionen des Gesundheitssystems?

    Kugler, Charlotte M / Perleth, Matthias / Mathes, Tim / Goossen, Käthe / Pieper, Dawid

    2023  , Page(s) 23dkvf127

    Event/congress 22. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung (DKVF); Berlin; Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung; 2023
    Keywords Medizin, Gesundheit
    Publishing date 2023-10-02
    Publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf
    Document type Conference proceedings
    DOI 10.3205/23dkvf127
    Database German Medical Science

    More links

    Kategorien

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  8. Conference proceedings: Sportmedizinische Vorsorgeuntersuchungen – eine Synopse internationaler Leitlinien und Konsensuspapiere

    Weise, Alina / Könsgen, Nadja / Schlumberger, Fabian / Joisten, Christine / Hirschmüller, Anja / Breuing, Jessica / Goossen, Käthe

    2023  , Page(s) 23dkvf060

    Event/congress 22. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung (DKVF); Berlin; Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung; 2023
    Keywords Medizin, Gesundheit
    Publishing date 2023-10-02
    Publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf
    Document type Conference proceedings
    DOI 10.3205/23dkvf060
    Database German Medical Science

    More links

    Kategorien

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  9. Conference proceedings: Datenbankkombinationen für die Recherche systematischer Reviews: eine aktualisierte methodische Studie

    Heinen, Lena / Goossen, Käthe / Hirt, Julian / Lunny, Carole / Puljak, Livia / Pieper, Dawid

    2023  , Page(s) 23ebmPSI–6–01

    Event/congress 24. Jahrestagung des Netzwerks Evidenzbasierte Medizin; Gesundheit und Klima – EbM für die Zukunft; Potsdam; Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin e.V.; 2023
    Keywords Medizin, Gesundheit
    Publishing date 2023-03-21
    Publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf
    Document type Conference proceedings
    DOI 10.3205/23ebm059
    Database German Medical Science

    More links

    Kategorien

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  10. Article ; Online: Author queries via email text elicited high response and took less reviewer time than data forms - a randomised study within a review.

    Goossen, Käthe / Rombey, Tanja / Kugler, Charlotte M / De Santis, Karina K / Pieper, Dawid

    Journal of clinical epidemiology

    2021  Volume 135, Page(s) 1–9

    Abstract: Objective: To compare two strategies for requesting additional information for systematic reviews (SR) from study authors.: Study design and setting: Randomised study within a SR of hospital volume-outcome relationships in total knee arthroplasty. We ...

    Abstract Objective: To compare two strategies for requesting additional information for systematic reviews (SR) from study authors.
    Study design and setting: Randomised study within a SR of hospital volume-outcome relationships in total knee arthroplasty. We sent personalized email requests for additional information to study authors as either email text ("Email" group) or attachment with self-developed, personalised data request forms ("Attachment" group). The primary outcome was the response rate, the secondary outcomes were the data completeness rate and the reviewer time invested in author contact.
    Results: Of 57 study authors, 29 were randomised to the Email group and 28 to the Attachment group. The response rate was 93% for Email and 75% for Attachment (odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval [0.9-24.0]). Complete data were provided by 55% (Email) vs. 36% (Attachment) of authors (odds ratio 2.2 [0.8-6.4]). The mean reviewer time was shorter in the Email (mean ± standard deviation of 20.2±14.4 minutes/author) than the Attachment group (31.8±14.4 minutes/author) with a mean difference of 11.6 [4.1-19.1] minutes/author.
    Conclusion: Personalised email requests elicited high response but only moderate data completeness rates regardless of the method (email text or attachment). Email requests as text took less reviewer time than creating attachments.
    MeSH term(s) Authorship ; Documentation/methods ; Electronic Mail/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Publishing ; Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Time
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-02-09
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 639306-8
    ISSN 1878-5921 ; 0895-4356
    ISSN (online) 1878-5921
    ISSN 0895-4356
    DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.006
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Full text online

    More links

    Kategorien

    In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

    Uh III Zs.206: Show issues Location:
    Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
    bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
    ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

To top