LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (CLEAR): extended follow-up from the phase 3, randomised, open-label study.

    Choueiri, Toni K / Eto, Masatoshi / Motzer, Robert / De Giorgi, Ugo / Buchler, Tomas / Basappa, Naveen S / Méndez-Vidal, María José / Tjulandin, Sergei / Hoon Park, Se / Melichar, Bohuslav / Hutson, Thomas / Alemany, Carlos / McGregor, Bradley / Powles, Thomas / Grünwald, Viktor / Alekseev, Boris / Rha, Sun Young / Kopyltsov, Evgeny / Kapoor, Anil /
    Alonso Gordoa, Teresa / Goh, Jeffrey C / Staehler, Michael / Merchan, Jaime R / Xie, Ran / Perini, Rodolfo F / Mody, Kalgi / McKenzie, Jodi / Porta, Camillo G

    The Lancet. Oncology

    2023  Volume 24, Issue 3, Page(s) 228–238

    Abstract: Background: In the primary analysis of the CLEAR study, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (data cutoff Aug 28, 2020). We ... ...

    Abstract Background: In the primary analysis of the CLEAR study, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (data cutoff Aug 28, 2020). We aimed to assess overall survival based on 7 months of additional follow-up.
    Methods: This is a protocol-prespecified updated overall survival analysis (data cutoff March 31, 2021) of the open-label, phase 3, randomised CLEAR trial. Patients with clear-cell advanced renal cell carcinoma who had not received any systemic anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer drug, were eligible for inclusion from 200 sites (hospitals and cancer centres) across 20 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive lenvatinib (20 mg per day orally in 21-day cycles) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 21 days; lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group), lenvatinib (18 mg per day orally) plus everolimus (5 mg per day orally; lenvatinib plus everolimus group [not reported in this updated analysis]) in 21-day cycles, or sunitinib (50 mg per day orally, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off; sunitinib group). Eligible patients were at least 18 years old with a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or higher. A computer-generated randomisation scheme was used, and stratification factors were geographical region and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center prognostic groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent imaging review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). In this Article, extended follow-up analyses for progression-free survival and protocol-specified updated overall survival data are reported for the intention-to-treat population. No safety analyses were done at this follow-up. This study is closed to new participants and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02811861.
    Findings: Between Oct 13, 2016, and July 24, 2019, 1417 patients were screened for inclusion in the CLEAR trial, of whom 1069 (75%; 273 [26%] female, 796 [74%] male; median age 62 years [IQR 55-69]) were randomly assigned: 355 (33%) patients (255 [72%] male and 100 [28%] female) to the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group, 357 (33%) patients (275 [77%] male and 82 [23%] female) to the sunitinib group, and 357 (33%) patients to the lenvatinib plus everolimus group (not reported in this updated analysis). Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 27·8 months (IQR 20·3-33·8) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 19·4 months (5·5-32·5) in the sunitinib group. Median progression-free survival was 23·3 months (95% CI 20·8-27·7) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 9·2 months (6·0-11·0) in the sunitinib group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·42 [95% CI 0·34-0·52]). Median overall survival follow-up was 33·7 months (IQR 27·4-36·9) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 33·4 months (26·7-36·8) in the sunitinib group. Overall survival was improved with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (median not reached [95% CI 41·5-not estimable]) versus sunitinib (median not reached [38·4-not estimable]; HR 0·72 [95% CI 0·55-0·93]).
    Interpretation: Efficacy benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib were durable and clinically meaningful with extended follow-up. These results support the use of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
    Funding: Eisai and Merck Sharp & Dohme.
    MeSH term(s) Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell ; Everolimus ; Follow-Up Studies ; Kidney Neoplasms ; Sunitinib
    Chemical Substances Everolimus (9HW64Q8G6G) ; lenvatinib (EE083865G2) ; pembrolizumab (DPT0O3T46P) ; Sunitinib (V99T50803M)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-02-28
    Publishing country England
    Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2049730-1
    ISSN 1474-5488 ; 1470-2045
    ISSN (online) 1474-5488
    ISSN 1470-2045
    DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00049-9
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Enfortumab vedotin after PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (EV‑201): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

    Yu, Evan Y / Petrylak, Daniel P / O'Donnell, Peter H / Lee, Jae-Lyun / van der Heijden, Michiel S / Loriot, Yohann / Stein, Mark N / Necchi, Andrea / Kojima, Takahiro / Harrison, Michael R / Hoon Park, Se / Quinn, David I / Heath, Elisabeth I / Rosenberg, Jonathan E / Steinberg, Joyce / Liang, Shang-Ying / Trowbridge, Janet / Campbell, Mary / McGregor, Bradley /
    Balar, Arjun V

    The Lancet. Oncology

    2021  Volume 22, Issue 6, Page(s) 872–882

    Abstract: Background: Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is generally incurable and has scarce treatment options, especially for cisplatin-ineligible patients previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy. Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug ... ...

    Abstract Background: Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is generally incurable and has scarce treatment options, especially for cisplatin-ineligible patients previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy. Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate directed at Nectin-4, a protein highly expressed in urothelial carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in the post-immunotherapy setting in cisplatin-ineligible patients.
    Methods: EV-201 is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study of enfortumab vedotin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Cohort 2 included adults (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less who were considered ineligible for cisplatin at enrolment and who had not received platinum-containing chemotherapy in the locally advanced or metastatic setting. Enfortumab vedotin was given intravenously at a dose of 1·25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 assessed by blinded independent central review. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of enfortumab vedotin. EV-201 is an ongoing study and the primary analysis is complete. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03219333.
    Findings: Between Oct 8, 2017, and Feb 11, 2020, 91 patients were enrolled at 40 sites globally, of whom 89 received treatment. Median follow-up was 13·4 months (IQR 11·3-18·9). At data cutoff (Sept 8, 2020), the confirmed objective response rate was 52% (46 of 89 patients; 95% CI 41-62), with 18 (20%) of 89 patients achieving a complete response and 28 (31%) achieving a partial response. 49 (55%) of 89 patients had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (eight [9%] patients), maculopapular rash (seven [8%] patients), and fatigue (six [7%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 15 (17%) patients. Three (3%) patients died due to acute kidney injury, metabolic acidosis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (one [1%] each) within 30 days of first dose and these deaths were considered by the investigator to be related to treatment; a fourth death from pneumonitis occurred more than 30 days after the last dose and was also considered to be related to treatment.
    Interpretation: Treatment with enfortumab vedotin was tolerable and confirmed responses were seen in 52% of cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. These patients have few treatment options, and enfortumab vedotin could be a promising new therapy for a patient population with a high unmet need.
    Funding: Astellas Pharma Global Development and Seagen.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects ; B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors ; B7-H1 Antigen/genetics ; Carcinoma/drug therapy ; Carcinoma/genetics ; Carcinoma/pathology ; Cell Adhesion Molecules/genetics ; Cisplatin/adverse effects ; Disease-Free Survival ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects ; Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/genetics ; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors ; Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Urologic Neoplasms/genetics ; Urologic Neoplasms/pathology ; Urothelium/drug effects ; Urothelium/pathology
    Chemical Substances Antibodies, Monoclonal ; B7-H1 Antigen ; CD274 protein, human ; Cell Adhesion Molecules ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ; PDCD1 protein, human ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor ; NECTIN4 protein, human ; enfortumab vedotin (DLE8519RWM) ; Cisplatin (Q20Q21Q62J)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-12
    Publishing country England
    Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2049730-1
    ISSN 1474-5488 ; 1470-2045
    ISSN (online) 1474-5488
    ISSN 1470-2045
    DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00094-2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top