Article ; Online: The redesign of an advanced practice registered nurse professional evaluation process and tool at a midwest academic medical center: A pilot project.
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
2021 Volume 33, Issue 12, Page(s) 1300–1306
Abstract: Background: Inconsistency and a lack of clarity exist regarding the advanced practice registered nurse peer review process in hospitals throughout the country.: Local problem: The current APRN peer review process in place for over a decade at an ... ...
| Abstract | Background: Inconsistency and a lack of clarity exist regarding the advanced practice registered nurse peer review process in hospitals throughout the country. Local problem: The current APRN peer review process in place for over a decade at an academic medical center has never been evaluated, and neither fulfills ongoing professional practice evaluation requirements nor meets the expectations of peer review. Methods: Pre-post intervention quality improvement project (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence checklist). Interventions: Using current professional standards and guidelines that meet the requirements for ongoing professional practice evaluation and nursing peer review, a redesigned process and tool was created and piloted in three specialty groups of nurse practitioners (NPs) at the medical center. Satisfaction before and after the pilot survey was measured using a Likert-type scale, and results were compared and analyzed following the completion of the pilot survey. Results: The posttest measure revealed a statistically significant improvement in satisfaction with the redesigned professional evaluation tool compared with the prepilot peer review tool. Conclusions: The redesign project demonstrated that using current professional standards and guidelines, a comprehensive process and tool for professional evaluation and peer review is achievable across NP specialties. |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeSH term(s) | Academic Medical Centers ; Advanced Practice Nursing ; Humans ; Nurse Practitioners ; Pilot Projects ; Process Assessment, Health Care | |||||
| Language | English | |||||
| Publishing date | 2021-02-03 | |||||
| Publishing country | United States | |||||
| Document type | Journal Article | |||||
| ZDB-ID | 2716317-9 | |||||
| ISSN | 2327-6924 ; 1745-7599 ; 2327-6886 ; 1041-2972 | |||||
| ISSN (online) | 2327-6924 ; 1745-7599 | |||||
| ISSN | 2327-6886 ; 1041-2972 | |||||
| DOI | 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000554 | |||||
| Shelf mark |
|
|||||
| Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
| Zs.A 2909: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.