LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Aging Back Clinics-a Geriatric Syndrome Approach to Treating Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults: Results of a Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Weiner, Debra K / Gentili, Angela / Rossi, Michelle / Coffey-Vega, Katherine / Rodriguez, Keri L / Hruska, Kristina L / Hausmann, Leslie / Perera, Subashan

    Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)

    2019  Volume 21, Issue 2, Page(s) 274–290

    Abstract: Objective: Treating chronic low back pain (CLBP) with spine-focused interventions is common, potentially dangerous, and often ineffective. This preliminary trial tests the feasibility and efficacy of caring for CLBP in older adults as a geriatric ... ...

    Abstract Objective: Treating chronic low back pain (CLBP) with spine-focused interventions is common, potentially dangerous, and often ineffective. This preliminary trial tests the feasibility and efficacy of caring for CLBP in older adults as a geriatric syndrome in Aging Back Clinics (ABC).
    Design: Randomized controlled trial.
    Setting: Outpatient clinics of two VA Medical Centers.
    Subjects: Fifty-five English-speaking veterans aged 60-89 with CLBP and no red flags for serious underlying illness, prior back surgery, dementia, impaired communication, or uncontrolled psychiatric illness.
    Methods: Participants were randomized to ABC care or usual care (UC) and followed for six months. ABC care included 1) a structured history and physical examination to identify pain contributors, 2) structured participant education, 3) collaborative decision-making, and 4) care guided by condition-specific algorithms. Primary outcomes were low back pain severity (0-10 current and seven-day average/worst pain) and pain-related disability (Roland Morris). Secondary outcomes included the SF-12 and health care utilization.
    Results: ABC participants experienced significantly greater reduction in seven-day average (-1.22 points, P = 0.023) and worst pain (-1.70 points, P = 0.003) and SF-12 interference with social activities (50.0 vs 11.5%, P = 0.0030) at six months. ABC participants were less likely to take muscle relaxants (16.7 vs 42.3%, P = 0.0481). Descriptively, UC participants were more likely to experience pain-related emergency room visits (45.8% vs 30.8%) and to be exposed to non-COX2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (73.1% vs 54.2%).
    Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that ABC care for older veterans with CLBP is feasible and may reduce pain and exposure to other potential morbidity.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Algorithms ; Chronic Pain/therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain/therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Management/methods ; Patient Education as Topic/methods ; Pilot Projects ; Treatment Outcome ; Veterans
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-10-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 2015903-1
    ISSN 1526-4637 ; 1526-2375
    ISSN (online) 1526-4637
    ISSN 1526-2375
    DOI 10.1093/pm/pnz179
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Quality and Value of Health Care in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Study.

    Segal, Andrea G / Rodriguez, Keri L / Shea, Judy A / Hruska, Kristina L / Walker, Lorrie / Groeneveld, Peter W

    Journal of the American Heart Association

    2019  Volume 8, Issue 9, Page(s) e011672

    Abstract: Background The attitudes of Department of Veterans Affairs ( VA ) cardiovascular clinicians toward the VA 's quality-of-care processes, clinical outcomes measures, and healthcare value are not well understood. Methods and Results Semistructured telephone ...

    Abstract Background The attitudes of Department of Veterans Affairs ( VA ) cardiovascular clinicians toward the VA 's quality-of-care processes, clinical outcomes measures, and healthcare value are not well understood. Methods and Results Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with cardiovascular healthcare providers (n=31) at VA hospitals that were previously identified as high or low performers in terms of healthcare value. The interviews focused on VA providers' experiences with measures of processes, outcomes, and value (ie, costs relative to outcomes) of cardiovascular care. Most providers were aware of process-of-care measurements, received regular feedback generated from those data, and used that feedback to change their practices. Fewer respondents reported clinical outcomes measures influencing their practice, and virtually no participants used value data to inform their practice, although several described administrative barriers limiting high-cost care. Providers also expressed general enthusiasm for the VA 's quality measurement/improvement efforts, with relatively few criticisms about the workload or opportunity costs inherent in clinical performance data collection. There were no material differences in the responses of employees of low-performing versus high-performing VA medical centers. Conclusions Regardless of their medical center's healthcare value performance, most VA cardiovascular providers used feedback from process-of-care data to inform their practice. However, clinical outcomes data were used more rarely, and value-of-care data were almost never used. The limited use of outcomes data to inform healthcare practice raises concern that healthcare outcomes may have insufficient influence, whereas the lack of value data influencing cardiovascular care practices may perpetuate inefficiencies in resource use.
    MeSH term(s) Attitude of Health Personnel ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards ; Health Care Costs/standards ; Health Care Surveys ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/economics ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/standards ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards ; Qualitative Research ; Quality Improvement/economics ; Quality Indicators, Health Care/economics ; Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards ; United States ; Veterans Health Services/economics ; Veterans Health Services/standards
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-04-24
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 2653953-6
    ISSN 2047-9980 ; 2047-9980
    ISSN (online) 2047-9980
    ISSN 2047-9980
    DOI 10.1161/JAHA.118.011672
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Utilization of the Veterans Affairs' Transgender E-consultation Program by Health Care Providers: Mixed-Methods Study.

    Blosnich, John R / Rodriguez, Keri L / Hruska, Kristina L / Kavalieratos, Dio / Gordon, Adam J / Matza, Alexis / Mejia, Susan M / Shipherd, Jillian C / Kauth, Michael R

    JMIR medical informatics

    2019  Volume 7, Issue 1, Page(s) e11695

    Abstract: Background: In 2015, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nationally implemented a transgender e-consultation (e-consult) program with expert clinical guidance for providers.: Objective: This mixed-methods project aimed to describe providers' ... ...

    Abstract Background: In 2015, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nationally implemented a transgender e-consultation (e-consult) program with expert clinical guidance for providers.
    Objective: This mixed-methods project aimed to describe providers' program experiences, reasons for nonuse of the program, and ways to improve the program use.
    Methods: From January to May 2017, 15 urban and rural VA providers who submitted at least one e-consult in the last year participated in semistructured interviews about their program experiences, which were analyzed using content analysis. From November to December 2017, 53 providers who encountered transgender patients but did not utilize the program participated in a brief online survey on the reasons for nonuse of the program and the facilitators encouraging use.
    Results: Qualitative analysis showed that providers learned of the program through email; colleagues; the electronic health record (EHR) system; and participation in the VA Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender committees or educational trainings. Providers used the program to establish care plans, hormone therapy recommendations, sexual and reproductive health education, surgical treatment education, patient-provider communication guidance, and second opinions. The facilitators of program use included understandable recommendations, ease of use through the EHR system, and status as the only transgender resource for rural providers. Barriers to use included time constraints, communication-related problems with the e-consult, impractical recommendations for underresourced sites, and misunderstanding of the e-consult purpose. Suggestions for improvement included addition of concise or sectioned responses, expansion of program awareness among providers or patients, designation of a follow-up contact person, and increase in provider education about transgender veterans and related care. Quantitative analysis showed that the common reasons for nonuse of the program were no knowledge of the program (54%), no need of the program (32%), and receipt of help from a colleague outside of e-consult (24%). Common suggestions to improve the program use in quantitative analyses included provision of more information about where to find e-consult in the chart, guidance on talking with patients about the program, and e-mail announcements to improve provider awareness of the program. Post hoc exploratory analyses showed no differences between urban and rural providers.
    Conclusions: The VA transgender e-consult program is useful for providers, but there are several barriers to implementing recommendations, some of which are especially challenging for rural providers. Addressing the identified barriers and enhancing the facilitators may improve program use and quality care for transgender veterans.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-01-14
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2798261-0
    ISSN 2291-9694
    ISSN 2291-9694
    DOI 10.2196/11695
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: A Program to Support Scholarship During Internal Medicine Residency Training: Impact on Academic Productivity and Resident Experiences.

    Carter, Andrea E / Anderson, Timothy S / Rodriguez, Keri L / Hruska, Kristina L / Zimmer, Shanta M / Spagnoletti, Carla L / Morris, Alison / Kapoor, Wishwa N / Fine, Michael J

    Teaching and learning in medicine

    2019  Volume 31, Issue 5, Page(s) 552–565

    Abstract: Problem: ...

    Abstract Problem:
    MeSH term(s) Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data ; Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration ; Efficiency ; Fellowships and Scholarships/organization & administration ; Humans ; Internship and Residency/organization & administration ; Leadership ; Program Evaluation ; Quality Improvement ; Schools, Medical
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-05-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1038640-3
    ISSN 1532-8015 ; 1040-1334
    ISSN (online) 1532-8015
    ISSN 1040-1334
    DOI 10.1080/10401334.2019.1604355
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top