LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 87

Search options

  1. Book: Ovarian cancer

    Jacobs, Ian J.

    [meetings held by the HHMT ...]

    2002  

    Institution Helene Harris Memorial Trust
    Author's details I. J. Jacobs ... [In collaboration with the Helene Harris Memorial Trust]
    Keywords Ovarian Neoplasms ; Eierstockkrebs
    Subject Ovarialkarzinom ; Ovarialcarcinom ; Ovarialkrebs
    Language English
    Size XIII, 427 S. : Ill., graph. Darst.
    Publisher Oxford Univ. Press
    Publishing place Oxford u.a.
    Publishing country Great Britain
    Document type Book
    HBZ-ID HT013311262
    ISBN 0-19-850826-3 ; 978-0-19-850826-7
    Database Catalogue ZB MED Medicine, Health

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Insights from UKCTOCS for design, conduct and analyses of large randomised controlled trials.

    Menon, Usha / Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra / Burnell, Matthew / Apostolidou, Sophia / Ryan, Andy / Kalsi, Jatinderpal K / Singh, Naveena / Fallowfield, Lesley / McGuire, Alistair J / Campbell, Stuart / Skates, Steven J / Dawnay, Anne / Parmar, Mahesh / Jacobs, Ian J

    Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)

    2023  , Page(s) 1–38

    Abstract: Abstract: Randomised controlled trials are challenging to deliver. There is a constant need to review and refine recruitment and implementation strategies if they are to be completed on time and within budget. We present the strategies adopted in the ... ...

    Abstract Abstract: Randomised controlled trials are challenging to deliver. There is a constant need to review and refine recruitment and implementation strategies if they are to be completed on time and within budget. We present the strategies adopted in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening, one of the largest individually randomised controlled trials in the world. The trial recruited over 202,000 women (2001-5) and delivered over 670,000 annual screens (2001-11) and over 3 million women-years of follow-up (2001-20). Key to the successful completion were the involvement of senior investigators in the day-to-day running of the trial, proactive trial management and willingness to innovate and use technology. Our underlying ethos was that trial participants should always be at the centre of all our processes. We ensured that they were able to contact either the site or the coordinating centre teams for clarifications about their results, for follow-up and for rescheduling of appointments. To facilitate this, we shared personal identifiers (with consent) with both teams and had dedicated reception staff at both site and coordinating centre. Key aspects were a comprehensive online trial management system which included an electronic data capture system (resulting in an almost paperless trial), biobanking, monitoring and project management modules. The automation of algorithms (to ascertain eligibility and classify results and ensuing actions) and processes (scheduling of appointments, printing of letters, etc.) ensured the protocol was closely followed and timelines were met. Significant engagement with participants ensured retention and low rates of complaints. Our solutions to the design, conduct and analyses issues we faced are highly relevant, given the renewed focus on trials for early detection of cancer.
    Future work: There is a pressing need to increase the evidence base to support decision making about all aspects of trial methodology.
    Trial registration: ISRCTN-22488978; ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT00058032.
    Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 16/46/01. The long-term follow-up UKCTOCS (2015 20) was supported by National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR HTA grant 16/46/01), Cancer Research UK, and The Eve Appeal. UKCTOCS (2001-14) was funded by the MRC (G9901012 and G0801228), Cancer Research UK (C1479/A2884), and the UK Department of Health, with additional support from The Eve Appeal. Researchers at UCL were supported by the NIHR UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and by the MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL core funding (MC_UU_00004/09, MC_UU_00004/08, MC_UU_00004/07). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-08-23
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2006765-3
    ISSN 2046-4924 ; 1366-5278
    ISSN (online) 2046-4924
    ISSN 1366-5278
    DOI 10.3310/CLDC7214
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Mortality impact, risks, and benefits of general population screening for ovarian cancer: the UKCTOCS randomised controlled trial.

    Menon, Usha / Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra / Burnell, Matthew / Ryan, Andy / Kalsi, Jatinderpal K / Singh, Naveena / Dawnay, Anne / Fallowfield, Lesley / McGuire, Alistair J / Campbell, Stuart / Skates, Steven J / Parmar, Mahesh / Jacobs, Ian J

    Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)

    2023  , Page(s) 1–81

    Abstract: Background: Ovarian and tubal cancers are lethal gynaecological cancers, with over 50% of the patients diagnosed at advanced stage.: Trial design: Randomised controlled trial involving 27 primary care trusts adjacent to 13 trial centres based at NHS ... ...

    Abstract Background: Ovarian and tubal cancers are lethal gynaecological cancers, with over 50% of the patients diagnosed at advanced stage.
    Trial design: Randomised controlled trial involving 27 primary care trusts adjacent to 13 trial centres based at NHS Trusts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
    Methods: Postmenopausal average-risk women, aged 50-74, with intact ovaries and no previous ovarian or current non-ovarian cancer.
    Interventions: One of two annual screening strategies: (1) multimodal screening (MMS) using a longitudinal CA125 algorithm with repeat CA125 testing and transvaginal scan (TVS) as second line test (2) ultrasound screening (USS) using TVS alone with repeat scan to confirm any abnormality. The control (C) group had no screening. Follow-up was through linkage to national registries, postal follow-up questionnaires and direct communication with trial centres and participants.
    Objective: To assess comprehensively risks and benefits of ovarian cancer screening in the general population.
    Outcome: Primary outcome was death due to ovarian or tubal cancer as assigned by an independent outcomes review committee. Secondary outcomes included incidence and stage at diagnosis of ovarian and tubal cancer, compliance, performance characteristics, harms and cost-effectiveness of the two screening strategies and a bioresource for future research.
    Randomisation: The trial management system confirmed eligibility and randomly allocated participants using computer-generated random numbers to MMS, USS and C groups in a 1:1:2 ratio.
    Blinding: Investigators and participants were unblinded and outcomes review committee was masked to randomisation group.
    Analyses: Primary analyses were by intention to screen, comparing separately MMS and USS with C using the Versatile test.
    Results: 1,243,282 women were invited and 205,090 attended for recruitment between April 2001 and September 2005.
    Randomised: 202,638 women: 50,640 MMS, 50,639 USS and 101,359 C group.
    Numbers analysed for primary outcome: 202,562 (>99.9%): 50,625 (>99.9%) MMS, 50,623 (>99.9%) USS, and 101,314 (>99.9%) C group.
    Outcome: Women in MMS and USS groups underwent 345,570 and 327,775 annual screens between randomisation and 31 December 2011. At median follow-up of 16.3 (IQR 15.1-17.3) years, 2055 women developed ovarian or tubal cancer: 522 (1.0% of 50,625) MMS, 517 (1.0% of 50,623) USS, and 1016 (1.0% of 101314) in C group. Compared to the C group, in the MMS group, the incidence of Stage I/II disease was 39.2% (95% CI 16.1 to 66.9) higher and stage III/IV 10.2% (95% CI -21.3 to 2.4) lower. There was no difference in stage in the USS group. 1206 women died of the disease: 296 (0.6%) MMS, 291 (0.6%) USS, and 619 (0.6%) C group. There was no significant reduction in ovarian and tubal cancer deaths in either MMS (p = 0.580) or USS (p = 0.360) groups compared to the C group. Overall compliance with annual screening episode was 80.8% (345,570/420,047) in the MMS and 78.0% (327,775/420,047) in the USS group. For ovarian and tubal cancers diagnosed within one year of the last test in a screening episode, in the MMS group, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values were 83.8% (95% CI 78.7 to 88.1), 99.8% (95% CI 99.8 to 99.9), and 28.8% (95% CI 25.5 to 32.2) and in the USS group, 72.2% (95% CI 65.9 to 78.0), 99.5% (95% CI 99.5 to 99.5), and 9.1% (95% CI 7.8 to 10.5) respectively. The final within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis was not undertaken as there was no mortality reduction. A bioresource (UKCTOCS Longitudinal Women's Cohort) of longitudinal outcome data and over 0.5 million serum samples including serial annual samples in women in the MMS group was established and to date has been used in many new studies, mainly focused on early detection of cancer.
    Harms: Both screening tests (venepuncture and TVS) were associated with minor complications with low (8.6/100,000 screens MMS; 18.6/100,000 screens USS) complication rates. Screening itself did not cause anxiety unless more intense repeat testing was required following abnormal screens. In the MMS group, for each screen-detected ovarian or tubal cancer, an additional 2.3 (489 false positives; 212 cancers) women in the MMS group had unnecessary false-positive (benign adnexal pathology or normal adnexa) surgery. Overall, 14 (489/345,572 annual screens) underwent unnecessary surgery per 10,000 screens. In the USS group, for each screen-detected ovarian or tubal cancer, an additional 10 (1630 false positives; 164 cancers) underwent unnecessary false-positive surgery. Overall, 50 (1630/327,775 annual screens) women underwent unnecessary surgery per 10,000 screens.
    Conclusions: Population screening for ovarian and tubal cancer for average-risk women using these strategies should not be undertaken. Decreased incidence of Stage III/IV cancers during multimodal screening did not translate to mortality reduction. Researchers should be cautious about using early stage as a surrogate outcome in screening trials. Meanwhile the bioresource provides a unique opportunity to evaluate early cancer detection tests.
    Funding: Long-term follow-up UKCTOCS (2015-2020) - National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR HTA grant 16/46/01), Cancer Research UK, and The Eve Appeal. UKCTOCS (2001-2014) - Medical Research Council (MRC) (G9901012/G0801228), Cancer Research UK (C1479/A2884), and the UK Department of Health, with additional support from The Eve Appeal. Researchers at UCL were supported by the NIHR UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and by MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL core funding (MR_UU_12023).
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-05-11
    Publishing country England
    Document type Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2006765-3
    ISSN 2046-4924 ; 1366-5278
    ISSN (online) 2046-4924
    ISSN 1366-5278
    DOI 10.3310/BHBR5832
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Ovarian cancer screening: UKCTOCS trial - Authors' reply.

    Jacobs, Ian J / Parmar, Mahesh / Skates, Steven J / Menon, Usha

    Lancet (London, England)

    2016  Volume 387, Issue 10038, Page(s) 2603–2604

    MeSH term(s) Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Humans ; Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality
    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-06-25
    Publishing country England
    Document type Comment ; Letter ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 3306-6
    ISSN 1474-547X ; 0023-7507 ; 0140-6736
    ISSN (online) 1474-547X
    ISSN 0023-7507 ; 0140-6736
    DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30849-2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Sexual functioning in 4,418 postmenopausal women participating in UKCTOCS: a qualitative free-text analysis.

    Harder, Helena / Starkings, Rachel M L / Fallowfield, Lesley J / Menon, Usha / Jacobs, Ian J / Jenkins, Valerie A

    Menopause (New York, N.Y.)

    2019  Volume 26, Issue 10, Page(s) 1100–1009

    Abstract: Objective: Sexual well-being can contribute significantly to the overall quality of women's lives. This qualitative study aimed to examine sexual activity, functioning, and satisfaction in a large sample of postmenopausal women from the UK Collaborative ...

    Abstract Objective: Sexual well-being can contribute significantly to the overall quality of women's lives. This qualitative study aimed to examine sexual activity, functioning, and satisfaction in a large sample of postmenopausal women from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) METHODS:: Thematic analysis was used to evaluate the free-text data of the Fallowfield Sexual Activity Questionnaire (FSAQ) completed by UKCTOCS participants at baseline before annual screening.
    Results: A total of 24,305 women completed the baseline FSAQ and 4,525 (19%) provided free-text data, with 4,418 comments eligible for analysis. Median age was 64 years; 65% had a partner and 22.5% were sexually active. Four interrelated themes were derived: partner availability, physical and sexual health, mental well-being, and interpersonal relationships. Primary reason for absence of sexual activity was lack of a partner, mainly due to widowhood (n = 1,000). Women discussed how partner's medical condition (27%) or sexual dysfunction (13.5%), their own physical health (18%) or menopause-related symptoms (12.5%), and prescribed medication (7%) affected sexual activity. Impact of low libido in self (16%) or partner (7%), relationship problems (10.5%) or logistics (6%), and perceptions of ageing (9%) were also mentioned. Few (3%) referred to positive sexual experiences or had sought medical help for sexual problems (6%).
    Conclusions: This qualitative analysis explored postmenopausal women's perspective on their sexual functioning. Having an intimate partner and good physical health are key factors for continuation of sexual activity and satisfaction. Further sexual education for healthcare professionals is needed to raise awareness about sexuality and sexual difficulties in later life. : Video Summary: Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/MENO/A426.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Aging/physiology ; Aging/psychology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Status ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Longitudinal Studies ; Middle Aged ; Postmenopause/physiology ; Postmenopause/psychology ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of Life ; Self Report ; Sexual Behavior/physiology ; Sexual Behavior/psychology ; Sexual Partners ; United Kingdom
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-07-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1205262-0
    ISSN 1530-0374 ; 1072-3714
    ISSN (online) 1530-0374
    ISSN 1072-3714
    DOI 10.1097/GME.0000000000001377
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Tumour stage, treatment, and survival of women with high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer in UKCTOCS: an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

    Menon, Usha / Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra / Burnell, Matthew / Ryan, Andy / Singh, Naveena / Manchanda, Ranjit / Kalsi, Jatinderpal K / Woolas, Robert / Arora, Rupali / Casey, Laura / Dawnay, Anne / Sharma, Aarti / Williamson, Karin / Apostolidou, Sophia / Fallowfield, Lesley / McGuire, Alistair J / Campbell, Stuart / Skates, Steven J / Jacobs, Ian J /
    Parmar, Mahesh K B

    The Lancet. Oncology

    2023  Volume 24, Issue 9, Page(s) 1018–1028

    Abstract: Background: In UKCTOCS, there was a decrease in the diagnosis of advanced stage tubo-ovarian cancer but no reduction in deaths in the multimodal screening group compared with the no screening group. Therefore, we did exploratory analyses of patients ... ...

    Abstract Background: In UKCTOCS, there was a decrease in the diagnosis of advanced stage tubo-ovarian cancer but no reduction in deaths in the multimodal screening group compared with the no screening group. Therefore, we did exploratory analyses of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer to understand the reason for the discrepancy.
    Methods: UKCTOCS was a 13-centre randomised controlled trial of screening postmenopausal women from the general population, aged 50-74 years, with intact ovaries. The trial management system randomly allocated (2:1:1) eligible participants (recruited from April 17, 2001, to Sept 29, 2005) in blocks of 32 using computer generated random numbers to no screening or annual screening (multimodal screening or ultrasound screening) until Dec 31, 2011. Follow-up was through national registries until June 30, 2020. An outcome review committee, masked to randomisation group, adjudicated on ovarian cancer diagnosis, histotype, stage, and cause of death. In this study, analyses were intention-to-screen comparisons of women with high-grade serous cancer at censorship (Dec 31, 2014) in multimodal screening versus no screening, using descriptive statistics for stage and treatment endpoints, and the Versatile test for survival from randomisation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, 22488978, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00058032.
    Findings: 202 562 eligible women were recruited (50 625 multimodal screening; 50 623 ultrasound screening; 101 314 no screening). 259 (0·5%) of 50 625 participants in the multimodal screening group and 520 (0·5%) of 101 314 in the no screening group were diagnosed with high-grade serous cancer. In the multimodal screening group compared with the no screening group, fewer were diagnosed with advanced stage disease (195 [75%] of 259 vs 446 [86%] of 520; p=0·0003), more had primary surgery (158 [61%] vs 219 [42%]; p<0·0001), more had zero residual disease following debulking surgery (119 [46%] vs 157 [30%]; p<0·0001), and more received treatment including both surgery and chemotherapy (192 [74%] vs 331 [64%]; p=0·0032). There was no difference in the first-line combination chemotherapy rate (142 [55%] vs 293 [56%]; p=0·69). Median follow-up from randomisation of 779 women with high-grade serous cancer in the multimodal and no screening groups was 9·51 years (IQR 6·04-13·00). At censorship (June 30, 2020), survival from randomisation was longer in women with high-grade serous cancer in the multimodal screening group than in the no screening group with absolute difference in survival of 6·9% (95% CI 0·4-13·0; p=0·042) at 18 years (21% [95% CI 15·6-26·2] vs 14% [95% CI 10·5-17·4]).
    Interpretation: To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that screening can detect high-grade serous cancer earlier and lead to improved short-term treatment outcomes compared with no screening. The potential survival benefit for women with high-grade serous cancer was small, most likely due to only modest gains in early detection and treatment improvement, and tumour biology. The cumulative results of the trial suggest that surrogate endpoints for disease-specific mortality should not currently be used in screening trials for ovarian cancer.
    Funding: National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK, The Eve Appeal.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Female ; Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Mass Screening ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-08-31
    Publishing country England
    Document type Randomized Controlled Trial ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2049730-1
    ISSN 1474-5488 ; 1470-2045
    ISSN (online) 1474-5488
    ISSN 1470-2045
    DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00335-2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Genetic and cellular mechanisms regulating anterior foregut and esophageal development.

    Jacobs, Ian J / Ku, Wei-Yao / Que, Jianwen

    Developmental biology

    2012  Volume 369, Issue 1, Page(s) 54–64

    Abstract: Separation of the single anterior foregut tube into the esophagus and trachea involves cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as dynamic changes in cell-cell adhesion and migration. These biological processes are regulated and coordinated at ... ...

    Abstract Separation of the single anterior foregut tube into the esophagus and trachea involves cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as dynamic changes in cell-cell adhesion and migration. These biological processes are regulated and coordinated at multiple levels through the interplay of the epithelium and mesenchyme. Genetic studies and in vitro modeling have shed light on relevant regulatory networks that include a number of transcription factors and signaling pathways. These signaling molecules exhibit unique expression patterns and play specific functions in their respective territories before the separation process occurs. Disruption of regulatory networks inevitably leads to defective separation and malformation of the trachea and esophagus and results in the formation of a relatively common birth defect, esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). Significantly, some of the signaling pathways and transcription factors involved in anterior foregut separation continue to play important roles in the morphogenesis of the individual organs. In this review, we will focus on new findings related to these different developmental processes and discuss them in the context of developmental disorders or birth defects commonly seen in clinics.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Body Patterning/genetics ; Esophagus/cytology ; Esophagus/growth & development ; Esophagus/metabolism ; Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental ; Humans ; Signal Transduction/genetics ; Trachea/growth & development ; Trachea/metabolism ; Transcription Factors/metabolism
    Chemical Substances Transcription Factors
    Language English
    Publishing date 2012-06-27
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1114-9
    ISSN 1095-564X ; 0012-1606
    ISSN (online) 1095-564X
    ISSN 0012-1606
    DOI 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.06.016
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: UKCTOCS update: applying insights of delayed effects in cancer screening trials to the long-term follow-up mortality analysis.

    Burnell, Matthew / Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra / Skates, Steven J / Ryan, Andy / Karpinskyj, Chloe / Kalsi, Jatinderpal / Apostolidou, Sophia / Singh, Naveena / Dawnay, Anne / Woolas, Robert / Fallowfield, Lesley / Campbell, Stuart / McGuire, Alistair / Jacobs, Ian J / Parmar, Mahesh / Menon, Usha

    Trials

    2021  Volume 22, Issue 1, Page(s) 173

    Abstract: Background: During trials that span decades, new evidence including progress in statistical methodology, may require revision of original assumptions. An example is the continued use of a constant-effect approach to analyse the mortality reduction which ...

    Abstract Background: During trials that span decades, new evidence including progress in statistical methodology, may require revision of original assumptions. An example is the continued use of a constant-effect approach to analyse the mortality reduction which is often delayed in cancer-screening trials. The latter led us to re-examine our approach for the upcoming primary mortality analysis (2020) of long-term follow-up of the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (LTFU UKCTOCS), having initially (2014) used the proportional hazards (PH) Cox model.
    Methods: We wrote to 12 experts in statistics/epidemiology/screening trials, setting out current evidence, the importance of pre-specification, our previous mortality analysis (2014) and three possible choices for the follow-up analysis (2020) of the mortality outcome: (A) all data (2001-2020) using the Cox model (2014), (B) new data (2015-2020) only and (C) all data (2001-2020) using a test that allows for delayed effects.
    Results: Of 11 respondents, eight supported changing the 2014 approach to allow for a potential delayed effect (option C), suggesting various tests while three favoured retaining the Cox model (option A). Consequently, we opted for the Versatile test introduced in 2016 which maintains good power for early, constant or delayed effects. We retained the Royston-Parmar model to estimate absolute differences in disease-specific mortality at 5, 10, 15 and 18 years.
    Conclusions: The decision to alter the follow-up analysis for the primary outcome on the basis of new evidence and using new statistical methodology for long-term follow-up is novel and has implications beyond UKCTOCS. There is an urgent need for consensus building on how best to design, test, estimate and report mortality outcomes from long-term randomised cancer screening trials.
    Trial registration: ISRCTN22488978 . Registered on 6 April 2000.
    MeSH term(s) Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; United Kingdom
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-03-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 2040523-6
    ISSN 1745-6215 ; 1468-6694 ; 1745-6215
    ISSN (online) 1745-6215
    ISSN 1468-6694 ; 1745-6215
    DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05125-8
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer.

    Jacobs, Ian J / Menon, Usha

    Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP

    2004  Volume 3, Issue 4, Page(s) 355–366

    Abstract: Ovarian cancer is characterize by few early symptoms, presentation at an advanced stage, and poor survival. As a result, it is the most frequent cause of death from gynecological cancer. During the last decade, a research effort has been directed toward ... ...

    Abstract Ovarian cancer is characterize by few early symptoms, presentation at an advanced stage, and poor survival. As a result, it is the most frequent cause of death from gynecological cancer. During the last decade, a research effort has been directed toward improving outcomes for ovarian cancer by screening for preclinical, early stage disease using both imaging techniques and serum markers. Numerous biomarkers have shown potential in samples from clinically diagnosed ovarian cancer patients, but few have been thoroughly assessed in preclinical disease and screening. The most thoroughly investigated biomarker in ovarian cancer screening is CA125. Prospective studies have demonstrated that both CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound can detect a significant proportion of preclinical ovarian cancers, and refinements in interpretation of results have improved sensitivity and reduced the false-positive rate of screening. There is preliminary evidence that screening can improve survival, but the impact of screening on mortality from ovarian cancer is still unclear. Prospective studies of screening are in progress in both the general population and high-risk population, including the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), a randomized trial involving 200,000 postmenopausal women designed to document the impact of screening on mortality. Recent advances in technology for the study of the serum proteome offer exciting opportunities for the identification of novel biomarkers or patterns of markers that will have greater sensitivity and lead time for preclinical disease than CA125. Considerable interest and controversy has been generated by initial results utilizing surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) in ovarian cancer. There are challenging issues related to the design of studies to evaluate SELDI and other proteomic technology, as well as the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of this new technology. Large serum banks such as that assembled in UKCTOCS, which contain preclinical samples from patients who later developed ovarian cancer and other disorders, provide a unique resource for carefully designed studies of proteomic technology. There is a sound basis for optimism that further developments in serum proteomic analysis will provide powerful methods for screening in ovarian cancer and many other diseases.
    MeSH term(s) Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Proteome/isolation & purification
    Chemical Substances Biomarkers, Tumor ; Proteome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2004-02-05
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2075924-1
    ISSN 1535-9484 ; 1535-9476
    ISSN (online) 1535-9484
    ISSN 1535-9476
    DOI 10.1074/mcp.R400006-MCP200
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Screening for ovarian cancer.

    Rosenthal, Adam N / Menon, Usha / Jacobs, Ian J

    Clinical obstetrics and gynecology

    2006  Volume 49, Issue 3, Page(s) 433–447

    Abstract: The efficacy of ovarian cancer screening remains to be proven. Advances in ultrasound and tumor marker technology, combined with complex statistical analysis have facilitated 2 large ongoing randomized controlled trials of screening which are powered to ... ...

    Abstract The efficacy of ovarian cancer screening remains to be proven. Advances in ultrasound and tumor marker technology, combined with complex statistical analysis have facilitated 2 large ongoing randomized controlled trials of screening which are powered to determine the impact on mortality. Serum proteomics seems to be a promising area for biomarker discovery, but requires more rigorous validation before it can be used in clinical trials. Current screening tests, clinical trials in the general and high-risk populations, screening acceptability and costs are reviewed in this article.
    MeSH term(s) Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening/economics ; Mass Screening/methods ; Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology ; Physical Examination ; Ultrasonography ; Uterus/diagnostic imaging
    Chemical Substances Biomarkers, Tumor
    Language English
    Publishing date 2006-07-19
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 391207-3
    ISSN 1532-5520 ; 0009-9201
    ISSN (online) 1532-5520
    ISSN 0009-9201
    DOI 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00004
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top