LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Integrating Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into routine nurse-led primary care for patients with multimorbidity

    Ian Porter / Antoinette Davey / Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli / Jonathan Evans / Charlotte Bramwell / Philip Evans / Chris Gibbons / Jose M. Valderas

    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    a feasibility and acceptability study

    2021  Volume 19

    Abstract: Abstract Background The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) in clinical practice has the potential to promote patient-centred care and improve patients’ quality of life. Individualized PROMs may be particularly helpful in identifying, ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Background The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) in clinical practice has the potential to promote patient-centred care and improve patients’ quality of life. Individualized PROMs may be particularly helpful in identifying, prioritizing and monitoring health problems of patients with multimorbidity. We aimed to develop an intervention centred around PROMs feedback as part of Primary Care annual reviews for patients with multimorbidity and evaluate its feasibility and acceptability. Methods We developed a nurse-oriented intervention including (a) training of nurses on PROMs; (b) administration to patients with multimorbidity of individualized and standardized PROMS; and (c) feedback to both patients and nurses of PROMs scores and interpretation guidance. We then tailored the intervention to patients with two or more highly prevalent conditions (asthma, COPD, diabetes, heart failure, depression, and hip/knee osteoarthritis) and designed a non-controlled feasibility and acceptability evaluation in a convenience sample of primary care practices (5). PROMs were administered and scores fed back immediately ahead of scheduled annual reviews with nurses. Patients and nurses rated the acceptability of the intervention using with a brief survey including optional free comments. Thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with a sample of participating patients (10) and nurses (4) and of survey free comments was conducted for further in-depth evaluation of acceptability. Feasibility was estimated based on rates of participation and completion. Results Out of 68 recruited patients (mean age 70; 47% female), 68 completed the PROMs (100%), received feedback (100%) and confirmed nurse awareness of their scores (100%). Most patients (83%) “agreed”/”strongly agreed” that the PROMs feedback had been useful, a view supported by nurses in 89% of reviews. Thematic analysis of rich qualitative data on PROMS administration, feedback and role in annual reviews indicated that both patients and nurses perceived ...
    Keywords Primary health care ; Multimorbidity ; Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) ; Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ; R858-859.7
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: STOPP/START interventions to improve medicines management for people aged 65 years and over

    Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli / Ian Porter / Antoinette Davey / Ignacio Ricci Cabello / Joanne Greenhalgh / Rob Anderson / Simon Briscoe / Carmel Hughes / Rupert Payne / Emma Cockcroft / Jim Harris / Charlotte Bramwell / Jose M Valderas

    Health Services and Delivery Research, Vol 9, Iss

    a realist synthesis

    2021  Volume 23

    Abstract: Background: Drug-related problems and potentially inappropriate prescribing impose a huge burden on patients and the health-care system. The most widely used tools for appropriate prescription in older adults in England and in other European countries ... ...

    Abstract Background: Drug-related problems and potentially inappropriate prescribing impose a huge burden on patients and the health-care system. The most widely used tools for appropriate prescription in older adults in England and in other European countries are the Screening Tool of Older People’s Prescriptions (STOPP)/Screening Tool to Alert to the Right Treatment (START) tools. STOPP/START tools support medicines optimisation for older adults. Objectives: To identify, test and refine the programme theories underlying how interventions based on the STOPP/START tools are intended to work, for whom, in what circumstances and why, as well as the resource use and cost requirements or impacts. Design: A realist synthesis. Setting: Primary care, hospital care and nursing homes. Patients: Patients aged ≥ 65 years. Interventions: Any intervention based on the use of the STOPP/START tools. Review methods: Database and web-searching was carried out to retrieve relevant evidence to identify and test programme theories about how interventions based on the use of the STOPP/START tools work. A project reference group made up of health-care professionals, NHS decision-makers, older people, carers and members of the public was set up. In phase 1 we identified programme theories about STOPP/START interventions on how, for whom, in what contexts and why they are intended to work. We searched the peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify documents relevant to the research questions. We interviewed experts in the field in our reference group to gain input on our list of candidate context–mechanism–outcome configurations, to identify additional context–mechanism–outcome configurations and to identify additional literature and/or relevant concepts. In phase 2 we reviewed and synthesised relevant published and unpublished empirical evidence and tested the programme theories using evidence from a larger set of empirical studies. Results: We developed a single logic model structured around three key mechanisms: (1) personalisation, (2) ...
    Keywords medication review ; medication reconciliation ; inappropriate medication ; older adults ; Public aspects of medicine ; RA1-1270 ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher National Institute for Health Research
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Proceedings of Patient Reported Outcome Measure’s (PROMs) Conference Sheffield 2016

    Tim Croudace / John Brazier / Nils Gutacker / Andrew Street / Dan Robotham / Samantha Waterman / Diana Rose / Safarina Satkunanathan / Til Wykes / Nasrin Nasr / Pamela Enderby / Jill Carlton / Donna Rowen / Jackie Elliott / Katherine Stevens / Hasan Basarir / Alex Labeit / Mairead Murphy / Sandra Hollinghurst /
    Chris Salisbury / Dominic Marley / James Wilson / Amy Barrat / Bibhas Roy / Ines Rombach / Órlaith Burke / Crispin Jenkinson / Alastair Gray / Oliver Rivero-Arias / Ian Porter / Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli / Charlotte Bramwell / Jose M. Valderas / Patricia Holch / Susan Davidson / Jacki Routledge / Ann Henry / Kevin Franks / Alex Gilbert / Kate Absolom / Galina Velikova / Jan R. Boehnke / Andrew Trigg / Ruth Howells / Jeshika Singh / Subhash Pokhrel / Louise Longworth

    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 14, Iss S1, Pp 1-

    advances in patient reported outcomes research

    2016  Volume 6

    Abstract: ... with multimorbidity: a feasibility study Ian Porter, Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli, Charlotte Bramwell, Jose M. Valderas ...

    Abstract Table of contents S1 Using computerized adaptive testing Tim Croudace S2 Well-being: what is it, how does it compare to health and what are the implications of using it to inform health policy John Brazier O1 “Am I going to get better?”—Using PROMs to inform patients about the likely benefit of surgery Nils Gutacker, Andrew Street O2 Identifying Patient Reported Outcome Measures for an electronic Personal Health Record Dan Robotham, Samantha Waterman, Diana Rose, Safarina Satkunanathan, Til Wykes O3 Examining the change process over time qualitatively: transformative learning and response shift Nasrin Nasr, Pamela Enderby O4 Developing a PROM to evaluate self-management in diabetes (HASMID): giving patients a voice Jill Carlton, Donna Rowen, Jackie Elliott, John Brazier, Katherine Stevens, Hasan Basarir, Alex Labeit O5 Development of the Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ) Mairead Murphy, Sandra Hollinghurst, Chris Salisbury O6 Developing the PKEX score- a multimodal assessment tool for patients with shoulder problems Dominic Marley, James Wilson, Amy Barrat, Bibhas Roy O7 Applying multiple imputation to multi-item patient reported outcome measures: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, sub-scale or score level Ines Rombach, Órlaith Burke, Crispin Jenkinson, Alastair Gray, Oliver Rivero-Arias O8 Integrating Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) into routine primary care for patients with multimorbidity: a feasibility study Ian Porter, Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli, Charlotte Bramwell, Jose M. Valderas O9 eRAPID: electronic self-report and management of adverse-events for pelvic radiotherapy (RT) patients Patricia Holch, Susan Davidson, Jacki Routledge, Ann Henry, Kevin Franks, Alex Gilbert, Kate Absolom & Galina Velikova O10 Patient reported outcomes (PROMs) based recommendation in clinical guidance for the management of chronic conditions in the United Kingdom Ian Porter, Jose M.Valderas O11 Cross-sectional and longitudinal parameter shifts in epidemiological data: measurement ...
    Keywords Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ; R858-859.7
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-10-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top