LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 38

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Fighting the infodemic: the 4 i Framework for Advancing Communication and Trust.

    Sundelson, Anne E / Jamison, Amelia M / Huhn, Noelle / Pasquino, Sarah-Louise / Sell, Tara Kirk

    BMC public health

    2023  Volume 23, Issue 1, Page(s) 1662

    Abstract: Background: The proliferation of false and misleading health claims poses a major threat to public health. This ongoing "infodemic" has prompted numerous organizations to develop tools and approaches to manage the spread of falsehoods and communicate ... ...

    Abstract Background: The proliferation of false and misleading health claims poses a major threat to public health. This ongoing "infodemic" has prompted numerous organizations to develop tools and approaches to manage the spread of falsehoods and communicate more effectively in an environment of mistrust and misleading information. However, these tools and approaches have not been systematically characterized, limiting their utility. This analysis provides a characterization of the current ecosystem of infodemic management strategies, allowing public health practitioners, communicators, researchers, and policy makers to gain an understanding of the tools at their disposal.
    Methods: A multi-pronged search strategy was used to identify tools and approaches for combatting health-related misinformation and disinformation. The search strategy included a scoping review of academic literature; a review of gray literature from organizations involved in public health communications and misinformation/disinformation management; and a review of policies and infodemic management approaches from all U.S. state health departments and select local health departments. A team of annotators labelled the main feature(s) of each tool or approach using an iteratively developed list of tags.
    Results: We identified over 350 infodemic management tools and approaches. We introduce the 4 i Framework for Advancing Communication and Trust (4 i FACT), a modified social-ecological model, to characterize different levels of infodemic intervention: informational, individual, interpersonal, and institutional. Information-level strategies included those designed to amplify factual information, fill information voids, debunk false information, track circulating information, and verify, detect, or rate the credibility of information. Individual-level strategies included those designed to enhance information literacy and prebunking/inoculation tools. Strategies at the interpersonal/community level included resources for public health communicators and community engagement approaches. Institutional and structural approaches included resources for journalists and fact checkers, tools for managing academic/scientific literature, resources for infodemic researchers/research, resources for infodemic managers, social media regulation, and policy/legislation.
    Conclusions: The 4 i FACT provides a useful way to characterize the current ecosystem of infodemic management strategies. Recognizing the complex and multifaceted nature of the ongoing infodemic, efforts should be taken to utilize and integrate strategies across all four levels of the modified social-ecological model.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Trust ; Ecosystem ; Health Communication ; Administrative Personnel ; Health Facilities
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-08-30
    Publishing country England
    Document type Review ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 2041338-5
    ISSN 1471-2458 ; 1471-2458
    ISSN (online) 1471-2458
    ISSN 1471-2458
    DOI 10.1186/s12889-023-16612-9
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: The efficacy of Facebook's vaccine misinformation policies and architecture during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Broniatowski, David A / Simons, Joseph R / Gu, Jiayan / Jamison, Amelia M / Abroms, Lorien C

    Science advances

    2023  Volume 9, Issue 37, Page(s) eadh2132

    Abstract: Online misinformation promotes distrust in science, undermines public health, and may drive civil unrest. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, Facebook-the world's largest social media company-began to remove vaccine misinformation as a matter ... ...

    Abstract Online misinformation promotes distrust in science, undermines public health, and may drive civil unrest. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, Facebook-the world's largest social media company-began to remove vaccine misinformation as a matter of policy. We evaluated the efficacy of these policies using a comparative interrupted time-series design. We found that Facebook removed some antivaccine content, but we did not observe decreases in overall engagement with antivaccine content. Provaccine content was also removed, and antivaccine content became more misinformative, more politically polarized, and more likely to be seen in users' newsfeeds. We explain these findings as a consequence of Facebook's system architecture, which provides substantial flexibility to motivated users who wish to disseminate misinformation through multiple channels. Facebook's architecture may therefore afford antivaccine content producers several means to circumvent the intent of misinformation removal policies.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; Social Media ; Policy ; Vaccines
    Chemical Substances Vaccines
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2810933-8
    ISSN 2375-2548 ; 2375-2548
    ISSN (online) 2375-2548
    ISSN 2375-2548
    DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adh2132
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Correction: Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to spread misinformation compared to other health topics.

    Broniatowski, David A / Kerchner, Daniel / Farooq, Fouzia / Huang, Xiaolei / Jamison, Amelia M / Dredze, Mark / Quinn, Sandra Crouse / Ayers, John W

    PloS one

    2024  Volume 19, Issue 2, Page(s) e0298907

    Abstract: This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261768.]. ...

    Abstract [This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261768.].
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-12
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Published Erratum
    ZDB-ID 2267670-3
    ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
    ISSN (online) 1932-6203
    ISSN 1932-6203
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0298907
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Communicating Effectively About Emergency Use Authorization and Vaccines in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Quinn, Sandra Crouse / Jamison, Amelia M / Freimuth, Vicki

    American journal of public health

    2020  Volume 111, Issue 3, Page(s) 355–358

    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; COVID-19 Vaccines/supply & distribution ; Cultural Competency ; Health Communication/methods ; Health Communication/standards ; Humans ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Trust ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration/organization & administration ; United States Food and Drug Administration/standards
    Chemical Substances COVID-19 Vaccines
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-25
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 121100-6
    ISSN 1541-0048 ; 0090-0036 ; 0002-9572
    ISSN (online) 1541-0048
    ISSN 0090-0036 ; 0002-9572
    DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306036
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article: The

    Jamison, Amelia M / Brewer, Janesse / Hamlin, Mary Davis / Forr, Amanda / Roberts, Robin / Carey, Aleen / Fugal, Adriele / Mankel, Magda E / Tovar, Yazmine / Adams, Stephanie / Shapcott, Katie / Salmon, Daniel

    Health promotion practice

    2024  , Page(s) 15248399231218937

    Abstract: Trust plays an integral part in the effective functioning of public health systems. During the COVID-19 pandemic, distrust of public health fueled vaccine hesitancy and created additional barriers to immunization. Although most Americans have received at ...

    Abstract Trust plays an integral part in the effective functioning of public health systems. During the COVID-19 pandemic, distrust of public health fueled vaccine hesitancy and created additional barriers to immunization. Although most Americans have received at least one COVID-19 vaccine, the percentage of fully immunized adults remains suboptimal. To reach vaccine-hesitant communities, it is vital that public health be worthy of trust. As trusted members of their communities, community health workers (CHWs) can serve as ideal messengers and conversation partners for vaccination decision-making. We developed the Be REAL framework and training materials to prepare CHWs to work with vaccine-hesitant communities nationwide. Through the four steps of "Relate," "Explore," "Assist," and "Leave (the door open)," CHWs were taught to prioritize relationship building as a primary goal. In this shift from focusing on adherence to public health recommendations (e.g., get vaccinated) to building relationships, the value of vaccine uptake is secondary to the quality of the relationship being formed. The Be REAL framework facilitates CHWs harnessing the power they already possess. The goal of the Be REAL framework is to foster true partnership between CHWs and community members, which in turn can help increase trust in the broader public health system beyond adherence to a specific recommendation.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2036801-X
    ISSN 1552-6372 ; 1524-8399
    ISSN (online) 1552-6372
    ISSN 1524-8399
    DOI 10.1177/15248399231218937
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Malicious Actors on Twitter: A Guide for Public Health Researchers.

    Jamison, Amelia M / Broniatowski, David A / Quinn, Sandra Crouse

    American journal of public health

    2019  Volume 109, Issue 5, Page(s) 688–692

    Abstract: Social bots and other malicious actors have a significant presence on Twitter. It is increasingly clear that some of their activities can have a negative impact on public health. This guide provides an overview of the types of malicious actors currently ... ...

    Abstract Social bots and other malicious actors have a significant presence on Twitter. It is increasingly clear that some of their activities can have a negative impact on public health. This guide provides an overview of the types of malicious actors currently active on Twitter by highlighting the characteristic behaviors and strategies employed. It covers both automated accounts (including traditional spambots, social spambots, content polluters, and fake followers) and human users (primarily trolls). It also addresses the unique threat of state-sponsored trolls. We utilize examples from our own research on vaccination to illustrate. The diversity of malicious actors and their multifarious goals adds complexity to research efforts that use Twitter. Bots are now part of the social media landscape, and although it may not be possible to stop their influence, it is vital that public health researchers and practitioners recognize the potential harms and develop strategies to address bot- and troll-driven messages.
    MeSH term(s) Attitude to Health ; Humans ; Information Dissemination/methods ; Public Opinion ; Social Media/statistics & numerical data ; United States ; Vaccination/psychology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-03-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 121100-6
    ISSN 1541-0048 ; 0090-0036 ; 0002-9572
    ISSN (online) 1541-0048
    ISSN 0090-0036 ; 0002-9572
    DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304969
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Vaccine Communication as Weaponized Identity Politics.

    Broniatowski, David A / Quinn, Sandra C / Dredze, Mark / Jamison, Amelia M

    American journal of public health

    2020  Volume 110, Issue 5, Page(s) 617–618

    MeSH term(s) Communication ; Humans ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology ; Politics ; Racism ; Vaccines/administration & dosage ; Vaccines/adverse effects
    Chemical Substances Vaccines
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Editorial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 121100-6
    ISSN 1541-0048 ; 0090-0036 ; 0002-9572
    ISSN (online) 1541-0048
    ISSN 0090-0036 ; 0002-9572
    DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305616
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: Using classification and regression tree analysis to explore parental influenza vaccine decisions

    Lama, Yuki / Hancock, Gregory R / Freimuth, Vicki S / Jamison, Amelia M / Quinn, Sandra Crouse

    Vaccine. 2020 Jan. 29, v. 38, no. 5

    2020  

    Abstract: Influenza poses a public health threat for children and adults. The CDC recommends annual influenza vaccination for children <18 years, yet vaccine uptake remains low for children (57.9%) and adults (37.1%). Given that parental decision-making is key in ... ...

    Abstract Influenza poses a public health threat for children and adults. The CDC recommends annual influenza vaccination for children <18 years, yet vaccine uptake remains low for children (57.9%) and adults (37.1%). Given that parental decision-making is key in childhood vaccine uptake, there is a critical need to understand vaccine hesitancy among parents who decide not to vaccinate their children. This study aims to explore predictors of children’s influenza vaccine status given parental vaccination status and examine the factors that contribute to concordance or discordance between parental and children’s vaccine uptake.Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were used to identify drivers of parental decisions to vaccinate their children against influenza. Hierarchy and interactions of these variables in predicting children’s vaccination status were explored.From a nationally representative sample of non-Hispanic Black and White parents who completed an online survey (n = 328), the main factors influencing parents’ decisions to vaccinate their children were vaccine behavior following physician recommendation, knowledge of influenza recommendations for children, influenza vaccine confidence and disease risk. Among unvaccinated parents, the greatest concordance was observed among parents who usually do not get vaccinated following physician recommendation and had lower knowledge of recommendations for influenza vaccination for children. The greatest discordance was observed among unvaccinated parents who had lower hesitancy about recommended vaccines.Understanding drivers of parental decisions to vaccinate themselves and their children can provide insights on health communication and provider approaches to increase influenza vaccine coverage and prevent influenza related mortality.
    Keywords adults ; childhood ; children ; decision making ; influenza ; influenza vaccination ; influenza vaccines ; mortality ; parents ; prediction ; public health ; regression analysis ; risk ; surveys
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2020-0129
    Size p. 1032-1039.
    Publishing place Elsevier Ltd
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 605674-x
    ISSN 1873-2518 ; 0264-410X
    ISSN (online) 1873-2518
    ISSN 0264-410X
    DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.039
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: "You don't trust a government vaccine": Narratives of institutional trust and influenza vaccination among African American and white adults.

    Jamison, Amelia M / Quinn, Sandra Crouse / Freimuth, Vicki S

    Social science & medicine (1982)

    2018  Volume 221, Page(s) 87–94

    Abstract: Vaccine confidence depends on trust in vaccines as products and trust in the system that produces them. In the US, this system consists of a complex network connecting pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, and the healthcare system. We explore ... ...

    Abstract Vaccine confidence depends on trust in vaccines as products and trust in the system that produces them. In the US, this system consists of a complex network connecting pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, and the healthcare system. We explore narratives from White and African American adults describing their trust in these institutions, with a focus on influenza vaccine. Our data were collected between 2012 and 2014 as part of a mixed-methods investigation of racial disparities in influenza immunization. We interviewed 119 adults, primarily in Maryland and Washington, DC, in three stages utilizing semi-structured interviews (12), focus groups (9, n = 91), and in-depth interviews (16). Analysis was guided by grounded theory. Trust in institutions emerged as a significant theme, with marked differences by race. In 2018, we contextualized these findings within the growing scholarship on trust and vaccines. Most participants distrusted pharmaceutical companies, which were viewed to be motivated by profit. Trust in government varied. Whites described implicit trust of federal institutions but questioned their competency. African Americans were less trusting of the government and were more likely to doubt its motives. Trust in institutions may be fragile, and once damaged, may take considerable time and effort to repair.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; African Americans/statistics & numerical data ; Drug Industry ; European Continental Ancestry Group/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Government ; Humans ; Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage ; Influenza, Human/prevention & control ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Narration ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Trust ; Vaccination
    Chemical Substances Influenza Vaccines
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-12-12
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 4766-1
    ISSN 1873-5347 ; 0037-7856 ; 0277-9536
    ISSN (online) 1873-5347
    ISSN 0037-7856 ; 0277-9536
    DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.020
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to spread misinformation compared to other health topics.

    Broniatowski, David A / Kerchner, Daniel / Farooq, Fouzia / Huang, Xiaolei / Jamison, Amelia M / Dredze, Mark / Quinn, Sandra Crouse / Ayers, John W

    PloS one

    2022  Volume 17, Issue 1, Page(s) e0261768

    Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic brought widespread attention to an "infodemic" of potential health misinformation. This claim has not been assessed based on evidence. We evaluated if health misinformation became more common during the pandemic. We gathered about ... ...

    Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic brought widespread attention to an "infodemic" of potential health misinformation. This claim has not been assessed based on evidence. We evaluated if health misinformation became more common during the pandemic. We gathered about 325 million posts sharing URLs from Twitter and Facebook during the beginning of the pandemic (March 8-May 1, 2020) compared to the same period in 2019. We relied on source credibility as an accepted proxy for misinformation across this database. Human annotators also coded a subsample of 3000 posts with URLs for misinformation. Posts about COVID-19 were 0.37 times as likely to link to "not credible" sources and 1.13 times more likely to link to "more credible" sources than prior to the pandemic. Posts linking to "not credible" sources were 3.67 times more likely to include misinformation compared to posts from "more credible" sources. Thus, during the earliest stages of the pandemic, when claims of an infodemic emerged, social media contained proportionally less misinformation than expected based on the prior year. Our results suggest that widespread health misinformation is not unique to COVID-19. Rather, it is a systemic feature of online health communication that can adversely impact public health behaviors and must therefore be addressed.
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/transmission ; COVID-19/virology ; Disinformation ; Humans ; Infodemic ; Public Health ; SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification ; Social Media
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-12
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2267670-3
    ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
    ISSN (online) 1932-6203
    ISSN 1932-6203
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0261768
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top