LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 6 of total 6

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Lower Patient Height and Weight Are Predisposing Factors for Complex Radial Arterial Catheterization

    Kristine Huber / Jan Menzenbach / Markus Velten / Se-Chan Kim / Tobias Hilbert

    Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 12, Iss 2225, p

    2023  Volume 2225

    Abstract: Background: Radial artery (RA) catheterization for invasive blood pressure monitoring is often performed via palpation, and an ultrasound is used secondarily only in case of multiple unsuccessful attempts. Although more elaborate, it has been shown that ... ...

    Abstract Background: Radial artery (RA) catheterization for invasive blood pressure monitoring is often performed via palpation, and an ultrasound is used secondarily only in case of multiple unsuccessful attempts. Although more elaborate, it has been shown that primary ultrasound-guided catheterization may be advantageous compared with palpation. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with difficult RA catheterization. Methods: Left RA ultrasound assessments were performed in patients with indicated invasive blood pressure monitoring the day before surgery. RA catheterization was performed by personnel blinded to the ultrasound results. Based on the number of attempts needed for successful catheter placement, the cohort was divided into uncomplicated (group 1) and difficult (more than one attempt, group 2) catheterization cases. Cases subjected to primary ultrasound were excluded from the analysis. Results: Body weight, height and surface area (BSA) of patients in group 2 ( n = 16) were significantly lower than those of patients in group 1 ( n = 25), and internal RA diameters were significantly smaller in group 2 patients. In the whole cohort, BSA was significantly associated with distal and proximal internal RA diameters. In contrast, no differences were observed in the skin-to-artery distance, the longitudinal axis deviation (kinking) or blood flow velocity. Median time to successful catheterization was 77 (47–179) s. Prolonged time needed for cannulation was significantly associated with lower body weight, BMI and BSA, and with reduced distal and proximal internal RA diameter. Conclusions: RA catheterization performed through pulse palpation may be difficult, especially in adult patients with lower body weight and height, due to reduced arterial diameters. Initial use of ultrasound in these patients may reduce first-attempt failure, preventing procedural delays and patient discomfort.
    Keywords ultrasound ; sonography ; arterial catheterization ; invasive blood pressure monitoring ; Medicine ; R
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher MDPI AG
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: The level of postoperative care influences mortality prediction by the POSPOM score

    Jan Menzenbach / Yannik C Layer / Yonah L Layer / Andreas Mayr / Mark Coburn / Maria Wittmann / Tobias Hilbert

    PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e

    A retrospective cohort analysis.

    2021  Volume 0257829

    Abstract: Background The Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) assesses the patients' individual risk for postsurgical intrahospital death based on preoperative parameters. We hypothesized that mortality predicted by the POSPOM varies ... ...

    Abstract Background The Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) assesses the patients' individual risk for postsurgical intrahospital death based on preoperative parameters. We hypothesized that mortality predicted by the POSPOM varies depending on the level of postoperative care. Methods All patients age over 18 years undergoing inpatient surgery or interventions involving anesthesia at a German university hospital between January 2006, and December 2017, were assessed for eligibility for this retrospective study. Endpoint was death in hospital following surgery. Adaptation of the POSPOM to the German coding system was performed as previously described. The whole cohort was divided according to the level of postoperative care (normal ward vs. intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 24 h vs. later than 24 h, respectively). Results 199,258 patients were finally included. Observed intrahospital mortality was 2.0% (4,053 deaths). 9.6% of patients were transferred to ICU following surgery, and mortality of those patients was increased already at low POSPOM values of 15. 17,165 patients were admitted to ICU within 24 h, and these patients were older, had more comorbidities, or underwent more invasive surgery, reflected by a higher median POSPOM score compared to the normal-ward group (29 vs. 17, p <0.001). Mortality in that cohort was significantly increased to 8.7% (p <0.001). 2,043 patients were admitted to ICU later than 24 h following surgery (therefore denoted unscheduled admission), and the median POSPOM value of that group was 23. Observed mortality in this cohort was highest (13.5%, p <0.001 vs. ICU admission <24 h cohort). Conclusion Increased mortality in patients transferred to high-care wards reflects the significance of, e.g., intra- or early postoperative events for the patients' outcome. Therefore, scoring systems considering only preoperative variables such as the POSPOM reveal limitations to predict the individual benefit of postoperative ICU admission.
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Validation of the Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) in Germany.

    Yannik C Layer / Jan Menzenbach / Yonah L Layer / Andreas Mayr / Tobias Hilbert / Markus Velten / Andreas Hoeft / Maria Wittmann

    PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 1, p e

    2021  Volume 0245841

    Abstract: Background The Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) based on preoperatively available data was presented by Le Manach et al. in 2016. This prognostic model considers the kind of surgical procedure, patients' age and 15 defined ... ...

    Abstract Background The Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM) based on preoperatively available data was presented by Le Manach et al. in 2016. This prognostic model considers the kind of surgical procedure, patients' age and 15 defined comorbidities to predict the risk of postoperative in-hospital mortality. Objective of the present study was to validate POSPOM for the German healthcare coding system (G-POSPOM). Methods and findings All cases involving anaesthesia performed at the University Hospital Bonn between 2006 and 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Procedures codified according to the French Groupes Homogènes de Malades (GHM) were translated and adapted to the German Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel (OPS). Comorbidities were identified by the documented International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) coding. POSPOM was calculated for the analysed patient collective using these data according to the method described by Le Manach et al. Performance of thereby adapted POSPOM was tested using c-statistic, Brier score and a calibration plot. Validation was performed using data from 199,780 surgical cases. With a mean age of 56.33 years (SD 18.59) and a proportion of 49.24% females, the overall cohort had a mean POSPOM value of 18.18 (SD 8.11). There were 4,066 in-hospital deaths, corresponding to an in-hospital mortality rate of 2.04% (95% CI 1.97 to 2.09%) in our sample. POSPOM showed a good performance with a c-statistic of 0.771 and a Brier score of 0.021. Conclusions After adapting POSPOM to the German coding system, we were able to validate the score using patient data of a German university hospital. According to previous demonstration for French patient cohorts, we observed a good correlation of POSPOM with in-hospital mortality. Therefore, further adjustments of POSPOM considering also multicentre and transnational validation should be pursued based on this proof of concept.
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 310
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Perioperative Vascular Biomarker Profiling in Elective Surgery Patients Developing Postoperative Delirium

    Jan Menzenbach / Stilla Frede / Janine Petras / Vera Guttenthaler / Andrea Kirfel / Claudia Neumann / Andreas Mayr / Maria Wittmann / Mark Coburn / Sven Klaschik / Tobias Hilbert

    Biomedicines, Vol 9, Iss 553, p

    A Prospective Cohort Study

    2021  Volume 553

    Abstract: Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) ranks among the most common complications in surgical patients. Blood-based biomarkers might help identify the patient at risk. This study aimed to assess how serum biomarkers with specificity for vascular and ... ...

    Abstract Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) ranks among the most common complications in surgical patients. Blood-based biomarkers might help identify the patient at risk. This study aimed to assess how serum biomarkers with specificity for vascular and endothelial function and for inflammation are altered, prior to or following surgery in patients who subsequently develop POD. Methods: This was a study on a subcohort of consecutively recruited elective non-cardiac as well as cardiac surgery patients (age > 60 years) of the single-center PROPDESC trial at a German tertiary care hospital. Serum was sampled prior to and following surgery, and the samples were subjected to bead-based multiplex analysis of 17 serum proteins (IL-3, IL-8, IL-10, Cripto, CCL2, RAGE, Resistin, ANGPT2, TIE2, Thrombomodulin, Syndecan-1, E-Selectin, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, CXCL5, NSE, and uPAR). Development of POD was assessed during the first five days after surgery, using the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU), the CAM, the 4-‘A’s test (4AT), and the Delirium Observation Scale (DOS). Patients were considered positive if POD was detected at least once during the visitation period by any of the applied methods. Non-parametric testing, as well as propensity score matching were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 118 patients were included in the final analysis; 69% underwent non-cardiac surgery, median overall patient age was 71 years, and 59% of patients were male. In the whole cohort, incidence of POD was 28%. The male gender was significantly associated with the development of POD ( p = 0.0004), as well as a higher ASA status III ( p = 0.04). Incidence of POD was furthermore significantly increased in cardiac surgery patients ( p = 0.002). Surgery induced highly significant changes in serum levels of almost all biomarkers except uPAR. In preoperative serum samples, none of the analyzed parameters was significantly altered in subsequent POD patients. In postoperative samples, CCL2 was significantly increased by a factor ...
    Keywords postoperative delirium ; biomarker ; vascular inflammation ; elective surgery ; cardiac surgery ; glycocalyx ; Biology (General) ; QH301-705.5
    Subject code 616 ; 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher MDPI AG
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Estimating patients’ risk for postoperative delirium from preoperative routine data - Trial design of the PRe-Operative prediction of postoperative DElirium by appropriate SCreening (PROPDESC) study - A monocentre prospective observational trial

    Jan Menzenbach / Vera Guttenthaler / Andrea Kirfel / Arcangelo Ricchiuto / Claudia Neumann / Linda Adler / Marjetka Kieback / Lisa Velten / Rolf Fimmers / Andreas Mayr / Maria Wittmann / Andreas Hoeft / Johanna Feggeler / Stefanie Huber-Petersen / Christine Thudium / Marlene Bottenberg / Jacqueline Fidorra / Merve Güven / Lucy Hida /
    Diane Jossen / Laureen Mundt / Katharina Schaaf / Nina Schwittlinsky / Antolina Toma / Orietta Toma

    Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, Vol 17, Iss , Pp - (2020)

    2020  

    Abstract: Background: Postoperative Delirium (POD) is the most common complication of elderly patients after surgery associated with increased postoperative morbidity, persistent care dependency and even mortality. Prevention of POD requires detection of patients ... ...

    Abstract Background: Postoperative Delirium (POD) is the most common complication of elderly patients after surgery associated with increased postoperative morbidity, persistent care dependency and even mortality. Prevention of POD requires detection of patients at high risk prior to surgery. PROPDESC intends to provide an instrument for preoperative routine screening of patients' risk for POD. Methods: PROPDESC is a monocentric prospective observatory trial including 1000 patients older than 60 years from various disciplines of a university hospital planned for surgery of at least 60 min. To develop a score predicting the risk for POD, anesthesiological stratifications, laboratory values, medication and known risk factors as well as quality of life and cognitive performance are taken into account. POD assessment is performed daily on the first five days after the operation respectively the end of sedation in the intensive care units and normal wards. The score is evaluated from 600 data sets and subsequently validated internally. The most appropriate predictors are determined by a component-wise gradient boosting approach. Discussion: Based on retrospective investigations, etiology of POD is considered multifactorial. By a prospective analysis of various factors, PROPDESC intends to provide an applicable tool to predict the risk for POD from preoperative routine data and assessment of cognitive function. Objective is to establish an automatically generating score in preoperative routine to screen patients for increased risk of POD as starting point for POD reduction and management. Model compilation requires a high significance and enhancement within compound as well as regular availability of the selected predictors. Trial registration: DRKS, DRKS00015715. Registered 13 December 2018 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00015715. Keywords: Postoperative delirium, Risk prediction, Risk score
    Keywords Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Elsevier
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Biomarker-guided intervention to prevent acute kidney injury after major surgery (BigpAK-2 trial)

    Joachim Gerss / Javier Ripollés-Melchor / Emmanuel Futier / Melanie Meersch / Carola Wempe / Detlef Kindgen-Milles / Alexander Zarbock / Markus W Hollmann / Sigismond Lasocki / Thomas Rimmele / Tim Rahmel / Michael Adamzik / Hartmuth Nowak / Ingeborg Welters / Brian Johnston / Ane Abad-motos / Alfredo Abad-gurumeta / Marc Moritz Berger / Davide Ricci /
    Maurizio Cecconi / Gudrun Kunst / Christian Stoppe / Christian Putensen / Marlies Ostermann / Sascha Ott / Brijesh Patel / Gabriele Baldini / Antoine Lamblin / Karen Williams / Elena Mancini / Christian Arndt / Hinnerk Wulf / Marc Irqsusi / Wim Vandenberghe / John Kellum / Raphael Weiss / Jackie Donovan / Lui G Forni / Giacomo Monti / Céline Monard / Markus A Weigand / Thorsten Brenner / Ulrich Jaschinski / Carlos Lopez / Maxime Leger / Emmanuel Rineau / Philipp Simon / María Gómez-Rojo / Lars Bergmann / Alicia Waite / Savino Spadaro / Alexander Wolf / Andrew Spence / Simon Dubler / Alexander PJ Vlaar / Patrick Schober / Ben C Creagh-Brown / Nandor Marczin / Emilio Maseda / Christian Strauss / Stefano Romagnoli / Christian Nusshag / Ulrich Gobel / Ángel Candela-Toha / Jon Silversides / Nuttha Lumlertgul / Khaschayar Saadat-Gilani / Vincent Legros / Timo Brandenburger / Thomas Dimski / Laura Huthmann / Claude Pelletier / Manon Schleß / Peter Rosenberger / Helene Häberle / Jan Gerrit Haaker / Matthias Gründel / Lucia Cattin / Laura Villarino Villa / Juan Victor Lorente / Christine Martin / Jan Larmann / Wolfgang Bauer / Giovanni Borghi / Benjamin O’Brien / Thilo von Groote / Antoine Guillaume Schneider / Silvia De Rosa / Diego Parise / Alice Bernard / Paula Fernández-Valdes-Bango / Irene Romero Bhathal / A Suarez-de-la-Rica / Gianluca Villa / Raquel García-Álvarez / Antonio Siniscalchi / Richard Ellerkmann / Florian Espeter / Christian Porschen / Mahan Sadjadi / Michael Storck / Tobias Brix / Dana Meschede / Wida Amini / Carina Stenger / Julius Freytag / Jens Brands / Matthias Unterberg / Britta Marko / Fabian Dusse / Wolfgang A Wetsch / Sandra E Stoll / Hendrik Drinhaus / Bernd W Böttiger / Onnen Mörer / Lars-Olav Harnisch / Roswitha Lubjuhn / Daniel Heise / Christian Bode / Andrea Sauer / Konrad Peukert / Lennart Wild / Philippe Kruse / Jan Menzenbach / Valbona Mirakaj / Sabine Hermann / Stefanie Decker / Mona Jung-König / Tobias Hölle / Sarah Dehne / Jörg Reutershan / Thomas Prüfer / Stefan Pielmeier / Indra Wimmelmeier / Michaela Scholz / Andrea Paris / Isabel Christina Gallego Zapata / Holger Pohl / Nirmeen Fayed / Kai Dielmann / Evelyn Martin / Tilo Koch / Alexander Mück / Philipp Deetjen / Ngoc Bich Mehlmann / Peter M Spieth / Andreas Güldner / Axel Rand / Maximillian Ragaller / Martin Mirus / Rebecca Bockholt / Marc Herzog / Maren Kleine-Brüggeney / Ant Isabelle Cristiani / Marion Ohl / Monica Vieira Da Silva / Gilda Filipe de Castro Reblo / Matthias Hilty / Katharina Spanaus / Benedetta Mura / Eleonora Terreni / Francesco Magiotti / Lorenzo Turi / Cristiana Laici / Chiara Capozzi / Andrea Castelli / Massimiliano Greco / Antonio Messina / Gianluca Castellani / Romina Aceto / Vinicio Danzi / Alessandro Rigobello / Massimo De Cal / Monica Zanella / Gaetano Scaramuzzo / Riccardo La Rosa / Paolo Priani / Alberto Volta Carlo / Stefano Turi / Martina Baiardo Redaelli / Marilena Marmiere / Kittisak Weerapolchai / Shelley Lorah / Fabiola D’Amato / Aneta Bociek / Rosario Lim / Benjie Cendreda / Reynaldo Dela Cuesta / Eirini Kosifidou / Zoka Milan / Juliana Fernanda / Emma Clarey / Daveena Meeks / Nicholas J Lees / Marco Scaramuzzi / Orinta Kviatkovske / Adam Glass / Christine Turley / Charlotte Quinn / Syeda Haider / Adam Rossiter / Syed Nasser / Ned Gilbert-Kawai / Tatjana Besse-Hammer / Eric Hoste / Hannah Schaubroeck / Jan De Waele / Jenni Breel / Eline de Klerk / Harm-Jan de Grooth / Lothar Schwarte / Alexander Loer / Alicia Ruiz-Escobar / Diana Fernández-García / Nerea Gómez-Pérez / Pascual Crespo-Aliseda / Cristina Cerro-Zaballos / Cristina Fernández-Martín / Eduardo Martín-Montero / Alejandro Suarez de la Rica / Héctor Berges Gutiérrez / Maria del Pino Heredia Pérez / Maria de los Reyes Bellido Fernández / Liena Izquierdo López / Javier Valiente Lourtau / Ma Angeles Ferre Colomer / Ma Azucena Pajares Moncho / Maria Jesús Montero Hernández / Esther Pérez Sancho / Silvia Polo Matínez / Pedro Rivera Soria / Maider Puyada Jáuregui / Hugo Rivera Ramos / Marta Antelo Adrán / Ramón Adalia Bartolomé / Patricia Galán Menéndez / Laura Llinares Espin / Yuri Santiago Loaiza Aldean / Víctor MoralesAriza / Rosalía Navarro-Perez / Luis Santé-Serna / Pedro de la Calle-Elguezabal / Rubén Sánchez-Martín / Inés De Soto / Pau Vallhonrat Alcántara / Laura Perelló Cerdà / Gal·la Rouras Hurtado / Paula Rodriguez Nieto / John Narros Sicluna / Angel Molero Molinero / Juan Pablo Nocete / Elena Murcia Sánchez / Stanislas Abrard / Marie-Luce Parrouffe / Frank Bidar / Lucie Aupetitgendre / Ugo Schiff / Bertille Paquette / Gaëlle Sellier / Nathalie Borgnetta / Benjamin Brochet / Thierry Floch / Julien Coffinet / Marion Leclercq-Rouget

    BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss

    study protocol for an international, prospective, randomised controlled multicentre trial

    2023  Volume 3

    Abstract: Introduction Previous studies demonstrated that the implementation of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline-based bundle, consisting of different supportive measures in patients at high risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), might ... ...

    Abstract Introduction Previous studies demonstrated that the implementation of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline-based bundle, consisting of different supportive measures in patients at high risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), might reduce rate and severity of AKI after surgery. However, the effects of the care bundle in broader population of patients undergoing surgery require confirmation.Methods and analysis The BigpAK-2 trial is an international, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial. The trial aims to enrol 1302 patients undergoing major surgery who are subsequently admitted to the intensive care or high dependency unit and are at high-risk for postoperative AKI as identified by urinary biomarkers (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2*insulin like growth factor binding protein 7 (TIMP-2)*IGFBP7)). Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either standard of care (control) or a KDIGO-based AKI care bundle (intervention). The primary endpoint is the incidence of moderate or severe AKI (stage 2 or 3) within 72 hours after surgery, according to the KDIGO 2012 criteria. Secondary endpoints include adherence to the KDIGO care bundle, occurrence and severity of any stage of AKI, change in biomarker values during 12 hours after initial measurement of (TIMP-2)*(IGFBP7), number of free days of mechanical ventilation and vasopressors, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), duration of RRT, renal recovery, 30-day and 60-day mortality, intensive care unit length-of-stay and hospital length-of-stay and major adverse kidney events. An add-on study will investigate blood and urine samples from recruited patients for immunological functions and kidney damage.Ethics and dissemination The BigpAK-2 trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Münster and subsequently by the corresponding Ethics Committee of the participating sites. A study amendment was approved subsequently. In the UK, the trial was adopted as an NIHR portfolio study. Results will ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R
    Subject code 616 ; 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top