LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: How do practitioners characterize land tenure security?

    Yuta J. Masuda / Allison C. Kelly / Brian E. Robinson / Margaret B. Holland / Charles Bedford / Malcolm Childress / Edward T. Game / Chloe Ginsburg / Thea Hilhorst / Steven W. Lawry / Daniela A. Miteva / Jessica Musengezi / Lisa Naughton‐Treves / William D. Sunderlin / Peter Veit

    Conservation Science and Practice, Vol 2, Iss 5, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)

    2020  

    Abstract: Abstract Improving land tenure security (LTS) is a significant challenge for sustainable development. The Sustainable Development Goals and other recent global initiatives have renewed and increased the need to improve LTS to address climate change, ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Improving land tenure security (LTS) is a significant challenge for sustainable development. The Sustainable Development Goals and other recent global initiatives have renewed and increased the need to improve LTS to address climate change, biodiversity loss, food security, poverty reduction, and other challenges. At the same time, policymakers are increasingly interested in evidence‐based policies and decisions, creating urgency for practitioners and researchers to work together. Yet, incongruent characterizations of LTS (identifying the key components of LTS) by practitioners and researchers can limit collaboration and information flows necessary for research and effective policymaking. While there are systematic reviews of how LTS is characterized in the academic literature, no prior study has assessed how practitioners characterize LTS. We address this gap using data from 54 interviews of land tenure practitioners working in 10 countries of global importance for biodiversity and climate change mitigation. Practitioners characterize LTS as complex and multifaceted, and a majority of practitioners refer to de jure terms (e.g., titling) when characterizing it. Notably, in our data just one practitioner characterized LTS in terms of perceptions of the landholder, contrasting the recent emphasis in the academic literature on landholder perceptions in LTS characterizations. Researchers should be aware of incongruence in how LTS is characterized in the academic literature when engaging practitioners.
    Keywords land tenure security ; practitioner ; property rights ; titling ; perceptions ; Ecology ; QH540-549.5 ; General. Including nature conservation ; geographical distribution ; QH1-199.5
    Subject code 333
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Wiley
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Can integrating wildlife and livestock enhance ecosystem services in central Kenya?

    Allan, Brian F / Heather Tallis / Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer / Steven Huckett / Virginia A Kowal / Jessica Musengezi / Sharon Okanga / Richard S Ostfeld / Jennifer Schieltz / Charles M Warui / Spencer A Wood / Felicia Keesing

    Frontiers in ecology and the environment. 2017 Aug., v. 15, no. 6

    2017  

    Abstract: Because wildlife and livestock compete for grazing resources, biodiversity conservation and livestock ranching typically have been portrayed as conflicting uses of African savannas. Here, we offer an alternative perspective by describing a savanna ... ...

    Abstract Because wildlife and livestock compete for grazing resources, biodiversity conservation and livestock ranching typically have been portrayed as conflicting uses of African savannas. Here, we offer an alternative perspective by describing a savanna ecosystem in central Kenya where wildlife and livestock exhibit a suite of potential positive interactions. For example, treating livestock with an acaricide offers the unintended benefit of removing ticks from the landscape, a result that has now been shown to occur at both large and small scales. When humans derive financial benefits both from wildlife (through tourism) and from livestock (through food production), they may achieve greater economic stability than when income is derived solely from one source. The integrated management of wildlife and livestock can simultaneously improve human health and wildlife conservation. Optimization of human and wildlife benefits will require the management of ecological and socioeconomic trade‐offs when conflicts occur between stakeholders.
    Keywords acaricides ; biodiversity conservation ; ecosystem services ; ecosystems ; food production ; grazing ; human health ; humans ; income ; landscapes ; livestock ; ranching ; savannas ; stakeholders ; ticks ; tourism ; wildlife ; wildlife management ; Kenya
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2017-08
    Size p. 328-335.
    Publishing place John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
    Document type Article
    Note JOURNAL ARTICLE
    ZDB-ID 2110853-5
    ISSN 1540-9309 ; 1540-9295
    ISSN (online) 1540-9309
    ISSN 1540-9295
    DOI 10.1002/fee.1501
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Incorporating Land Tenure Security into Conservation

    Robinson, Brian E / Allison Kelly / Charles Bedford / Chloe Ginsburg / Christoph Nolte / Daniela A. Miteva / Diana Fletschner / Edward T. Game / Jessica Musengezi / Lisa Naughton‐Treves / Malcolm Childress / Margaret B. Holland / Peter Veit / Steven Lawry / Thea Hilhorst / William D. Sunderlin / Yuta J. Masuda

    Conservation letters. 2018 Mar., v. 11, no. 2

    2018  

    Abstract: Insecure land tenure plagues many developing and tropical regions, often where conservation concerns are highest. Conservation organizations have long focused on protected areas as tenure interventions, but are now thinking more comprehensively about ... ...

    Abstract Insecure land tenure plagues many developing and tropical regions, often where conservation concerns are highest. Conservation organizations have long focused on protected areas as tenure interventions, but are now thinking more comprehensively about whether and how to incorporate other land tenure strategies into their work, and how to more soundly ground such interventions on evidence of both conservation and human benefits. Through a review of the literature on land tenure security as it relates to conservation practice, predominantly in the tropics, we aim to help conservation practitioners consider and incorporate more appropriate land tenure security interventions into conservation strategies. We present a framework that identifies three common ways in which land tenure security can impact human and conservation outcomes, and suggest practical ways to distill tenure and tenure security issues for a given location. We conclude with steps for considering tenure security issues in the context of conservation projects and identify areas for future research.
    Keywords conservation areas ; humans ; land tenure ; tropics
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2018-03
    Size p. e12383.
    Publishing place John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
    Document type Article
    Note REVIEW
    ISSN 1755-263X
    DOI 10.1111/conl.12383
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top