Article ; Online: Clinical importance in Alzheimer's disease: effects of anchor agreement and disease severity.
Aging clinical and experimental research
2024 Volume 36, Issue 1, Page(s) 5
Abstract: Objectives: Methods of evaluating clinically meaningful decline are critical in research on Alzheimer's disease. A common method of quantifying clinically meaningful change is to calculate an anchor-based minimal clinically important difference (MCID) ... ...
Abstract | Objectives: Methods of evaluating clinically meaningful decline are critical in research on Alzheimer's disease. A common method of quantifying clinically meaningful change is to calculate an anchor-based minimal clinically important difference (MCID) score. In this approach, individuals who report a meaningful change serve as the "anchors", and the mean level of change for this group serves as the MCID. In research on Alzheimer's disease, there are several possible anchors, including patients, knowledgeable observers (e.g., a family member), and clinicians. The goal of this study was to examine the extent to which agreement among anchors impacts MCID estimation and whether this relationship is moderated by cognitive severity status. Methods: Analyses were completed on a longitudinal sample of 2247 adults, aged 50-103, from the Uniform Data Set. Outcome measures included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, and Functional Activities Questionnaire. Results: For all of the outcomes, the MCID estimate was significantly higher when meaningful decline was endorsed by all of the anchors compared to when there was disagreement among the anchors. In addition, the MCID estimate was higher with increasing severity of cognitive impairment. Finally, cognitive severity status moderated the influence of agreement among anchors on MCID estimation; as disease severity increased, anchor agreement demonstrated less influence on the MCID. Conclusions: MCID estimates based on one anchor may underestimate meaningful change, and researchers should consider the viewpoints of multiple anchors in constructing MCIDs, particularly in the early stages of cognitive decline. |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Humans ; Clinical Relevance ; Alzheimer Disease ; Patient Acuity ; Cognitive Dysfunction ; Family |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2024-01-24 |
Publishing country | Germany |
Document type | Journal Article |
ZDB-ID | 2104785-6 |
ISSN | 1720-8319 ; 1594-0667 |
ISSN (online) | 1720-8319 |
ISSN | 1594-0667 |
DOI | 10.1007/s40520-023-02643-0 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
Zs.A 3343: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.