LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="Jovanovski, Sara D"
  2. AU="Navarro, M"
  3. AU="Raetz, Jaqueline"
  4. AU="Staudenmayer, Kristan"
  5. AU="Ferreyra-Reyes, Leticia Dolores"
  6. AU="Das, Papita"
  7. AU="Napoletano, Brian M"
  8. AU="Georgia Paxton"
  9. AU="Hepworth, L R"
  10. AU="Loghmani, Mary Terry"
  11. AU="Sykes, Craig"
  12. AU="Mes, S D"
  13. AU="Dragojevic, Irena"
  14. AU="Berti, Aldo F"
  15. AU="Kähne, Thilo"
  16. AU="Díaz Díaz, Domingo"
  17. AU=Aziz Monowar
  18. AU=Zaki Ahmed A
  19. AU="Pandey, Shalini"
  20. AU="Goversen, Birgit"
  21. AU="Caicedo, Carlos"
  22. AU=Fribley Andrew AU=Fribley Andrew
  23. AU="Boffelli, Stefano"
  24. AU="Draper, Evan W"
  25. AU="Rosenblum, Shira T"
  26. AU=Kavousi Javid
  27. AU="Mukram, Mohd Azeemuddin"
  28. AU="Farzana Yasmin"
  29. AU=Epel Elissa S
  30. AU="Voet, W"
  31. AU="Jay Patel"
  32. AU="Iacob, Nicusor"
  33. AU="Guo, Dengyang"
  34. AU="Galacho-Harriero, Ana María"
  35. AU="Awoyelu, E H"
  36. AU="Tinajero, Jose"
  37. AU=Vashishtha Vipin M AU=Vashishtha Vipin M
  38. AU="D'Agostino, Nicole"
  39. AU="Lunetta, Kathryn L"
  40. AU="Tirschmann, Felix"
  41. AU="Adetuyi, B.O."

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 1 von insgesamt 1

Suchoptionen

Artikel ; Online: Nonadiabatic transition probabilities for quantum systems in electromagnetic fields: Dephasing and population relaxation due to contact with a bath.

Jovanovski, Sara D / Mandal, Anirban / Hunt, Katharine L C

The Journal of chemical physics

2023  Band 158, Heft 16

Abstract: We contrast Dirac's theory of transition probabilities and the theory of nonadiabatic transition probabilities, applied to a perturbed system that is coupled to a bath. In Dirac's analysis, the presence of an excited state |k0⟩ in the time-dependent wave ...

Abstract We contrast Dirac's theory of transition probabilities and the theory of nonadiabatic transition probabilities, applied to a perturbed system that is coupled to a bath. In Dirac's analysis, the presence of an excited state |k0⟩ in the time-dependent wave function constitutes a transition. In the nonadiabatic theory, a transition occurs when the wave function develops a term that is not adiabatically connected to the initial state. Landau and Lifshitz separated Dirac's excited-state coefficients into a term that follows the adiabatic theorem of Born and Fock and a nonadiabatic term that represents excitation across an energy gap. If the system remains coherent, the two approaches are equivalent. However, differences between the two approaches arise when coupling to a bath causes dephasing, a situation that was not treated by Dirac. For two-level model systems in static electric fields, we add relaxation terms to the Liouville equation for the time derivative of the density matrix. We contrast the results obtained from the two theories. In the analysis based on Dirac's transition probabilities, the steady state of the system is not an equilibrium state; also, the steady-state population ρkk,s increases with increasing strength of the perturbation and its value depends on the dephasing time T2. In the nonadiabatic theory, the system evolves to the thermal equilibrium with the bath. The difference is not simply due to the choice of basis because the difference remains when the results are transformed to a common basis.
Sprache Englisch
Erscheinungsdatum 2023-04-26
Erscheinungsland United States
Dokumenttyp Journal Article
ZDB-ID 3113-6
ISSN 1089-7690 ; 0021-9606
ISSN (online) 1089-7690
ISSN 0021-9606
DOI 10.1063/5.0138817
Signatur
Z 4' 49/16: Hefte anzeigen
Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Zusatzmaterialien

Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang