LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: The accuracy of the double-K adjustment for third-generation intraocular lens calculation formulas in previous keratorefractive surgery eyes.

Awwad, Shady T / Kilby, Ann / Bowman, R Wayne / Verity, Steven M / Cavanagh, H Dwight / Pessach, Yuval / McCulley, James P

Eye & contact lens

2013  Volume 39, Issue 3, Page(s) 220–227

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the double-K (DK) modification on third-generation formulas.: Methods: Thirty-eight previously myopic and 24 previously hyperopic eyes that underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) insertion after ... ...

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the double-K (DK) modification on third-generation formulas.
Methods: Thirty-eight previously myopic and 24 previously hyperopic eyes that underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) insertion after Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) were evaluated. Pre-LASIK refraction and keratometry, post-LASIK topography, axial length (AL), IOL type and power, and 1-month postphacoemulsification refraction were recorded spherical equivalent after phacoemulsification (SE(postphaco)). Measured corneal power was adjusted using published and validated methods for postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK. For each eye, and using SE(postphaco), different DK-IOL formulas were used to calculate the corresponding IOL power, the outcome measure, which was compared with the implanted IOL.
Results: DK-Holladay 1 yielded the highest Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), 0.955 for myopes and 0.943 for high myopes (AL>26 mm). Mean error (ME) and mean absolute error (MAE) for myopes for DK Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff theoretical formula [DK-SRK/T] were 0.44±0.84 D and 0.75±0.61 D for DK-SRK/T compared with -0.04±0.67 D and 0.52±0.40 D for DK-Holladay 1 (P<0.001 and P=0.016, respectively), and 0.03±0.88 and 0.64±0.58 for DK-Hoffer Q. For high myopes, ME and MAE were 0.75±0.81 D and 0.84±0.69 D for DK-SRK/T, and -0.05±0.74 D (P<0.0001) and 0.57±0.45 D (P=0.019) for DK-Holladay 1. About 29% of DK-SRK/T eyes with large AL had MAE>1.5 D, compared with 0% for DK-Holladay 1 and 14% for DK-Hoffer-Q. Eyes with previous hyperopic LASIK faired similarly for all formulas, with similar PCCs, and only 8% in each category with MAE>1.5 D.
Conclusions: DK-SRK/T overestimates IOL power in eyes with large AL, especially with concomitant steep pre-lasik keratometry. Among third-generation formulas, DK-Holladay 1 seems more accurate to use in postmyopic LASIK eyes.
MeSH term(s) Aged ; Axial Length, Eye ; Corneal Topography ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperopia/physiopathology ; Hyperopia/surgery ; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia/physiopathology ; Myopia/surgery ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Phacoemulsification/methods ; Refraction, Ocular ; Retrospective Studies
Language English
Publishing date 2013-05
Publishing country United States
Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ZDB-ID 2103049-2
ISSN 1542-233X ; 1542-2321
ISSN (online) 1542-233X
ISSN 1542-2321
DOI 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31828af126
Shelf mark
Zs.B 1724: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top