LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Receipt of Tobacco Treatment and One-Year Smoking Cessation Rates Following Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

    Heffner, Jaimee L / Coggeshall, Scott / Wheat, Chelle L / Krebs, Paul / Feemster, Laura C / Klein, Deborah E / Nici, Linda / Johnson, Hannah / Zeliadt, Steven B

    Journal of general internal medicine

    2021  Volume 37, Issue 7, Page(s) 1704–1712

    Abstract: Background: Implementation of effective smoking cessation interventions in lung cancer screening has been identified as a high-priority research gap, but knowledge of current practices to guide process improvement is limited due to the slow uptake of ... ...

    Abstract Background: Implementation of effective smoking cessation interventions in lung cancer screening has been identified as a high-priority research gap, but knowledge of current practices to guide process improvement is limited due to the slow uptake of screening and dearth of data to assess cessation-related practices and outcomes under real-world conditions.
    Objective: To evaluate cessation treatment receipt and 1-year post-screening cessation outcomes within the largest integrated healthcare system in the USA-the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Design Observational study using administrative data from electronic medical records (EMR). Patients Currently smoking Veterans who received a first lung cancer screening test using low-dose CT (LDCT) between January 2014 and June 2018. Main Outcomes Tobacco treatment received within the window of 30 days before and 30 days after LDCT; 1-year quit rates based on EMR Smoking Health Factors data 6-18 months after LDCT. Key Results Of the 47,609 current smokers screened (95.3% male), 8702 (18.3%) received pharmacotherapy and/or behavioral treatment for smoking cessation; 531 (1.1%) received both. Of those receiving pharmacotherapy, only one in four received one of the most effective medications: varenicline (12.1%) or combination nicotine replacement therapy (14.3%). Overall, 5400 Veterans quit smoking-a rate of 11.3% (missing=smoking) or 13.5% (complete case analysis). Treatment receipt and cessation were associated with numerous sociodemographic, clinical, and screening-related factors.
    Conclusions: One-year quit rates for Veterans receiving lung cancer screening in VHA are similar to those reported in LDCT clinical trials and cohort studies (i.e., 10-17%). Only 1% of Veterans received the recommended combination of pharmacotherapy and counseling, and the most effective pharmacotherapies were not the most commonly received ones. The value of screening within VHA could be improved by addressing these treatment gaps, as well as the observed disparities in treatment receipt or cessation by race, rurality, and psychiatric conditions.
    MeSH term(s) Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology ; Lung Neoplasms/therapy ; Male ; Smoking Cessation/methods ; Nicotiana ; Tobacco Use Cessation Devices ; Veterans Health
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-19
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Observational Study ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 639008-0
    ISSN 1525-1497 ; 0884-8734
    ISSN (online) 1525-1497
    ISSN 0884-8734
    DOI 10.1007/s11606-021-07011-0
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Challenges to Educating Smokers About Lung Cancer Screening: a Qualitative Study of Decision Making Experiences in Primary Care.

    Greene, Preston A / Sayre, George / Heffner, Jaimee L / Klein, Deborah E / Krebs, Paul / Au, David H / Zeliadt, Steven B

    Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education

    2018  Volume 34, Issue 6, Page(s) 1142–1149

    Abstract: We sought to qualitatively explore how those at highest risk for lung cancer, current smokers, experienced, understood, and made decisions about participation in lung cancer screening (LCS) after being offered in the target setting for implementation, ... ...

    Abstract We sought to qualitatively explore how those at highest risk for lung cancer, current smokers, experienced, understood, and made decisions about participation in lung cancer screening (LCS) after being offered in the target setting for implementation, routine primary care visits. Thirty-seven current smokers were identified within 4 weeks of being offered LCS at seven sites participating in the Veterans Health Administration Clinical Demonstration Project and interviewed via telephone using semi-structured qualitative interviews. Transcripts were coded by two raters and analyzed thematically using iterative inductive content analysis. Five challenges to smokers' decision-making lead to overestimated benefits and minimized risks of LCS: fear of lung cancer fixated focus on inflated screening benefits; shame, regret, and low self-esteem stemming from continued smoking situated screening as less averse and more beneficial; screening was mistakenly believed to provide general evaluation of lungs and reassurance was sought about potential damage caused by smoking; decision-making was deferred to providers; and indifference about numerical educational information that was poorly understood. Biased understanding of risks and benefits was complicated by emotion-driven, uninformed decision-making. Emotional and cognitive biases may interfere with educating and supporting smokers' decision-making and may require interventions tailored for their unique needs.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Decision Making ; Early Detection of Cancer/psychology ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced ; Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms/psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Primary Health Care ; Qualitative Research ; Smokers/education ; Smokers/psychology ; Smoking/adverse effects ; Smoking/psychology ; Smoking Cessation/psychology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-08-30
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 632898-2
    ISSN 1543-0154 ; 0885-8195 ; 1543-1154
    ISSN (online) 1543-0154
    ISSN 0885-8195 ; 1543-1154
    DOI 10.1007/s13187-018-1420-y
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Smokers' Inaccurate Beliefs about the Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening.

    Heffner, Jaimee L / Krebs, Paul / Johnson, Hannah / Greene, Preston A / Klein, Deborah E / Feemster, Laura C / Slatore, Christopher G / Au, David H / Zeliadt, Steven B

    Annals of the American Thoracic Society

    2018  Volume 15, Issue 9, Page(s) 1110–1113

    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Smokers ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; United States ; United States Department of Veterans Affairs
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-06-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 2717461-X
    ISSN 2325-6621 ; 1943-5665 ; 2325-6621
    ISSN (online) 2325-6621 ; 1943-5665
    ISSN 2325-6621
    DOI 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201804-259RL
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Attitudes and Perceptions About Smoking Cessation in the Context of Lung Cancer Screening.

    Zeliadt, Steven B / Heffner, Jaimee L / Sayre, George / Klein, Deborah E / Simons, Carol / Williams, Jennifer / Reinke, Lynn F / Au, David H

    JAMA internal medicine

    2015  Volume 175, Issue 9, Page(s) 1530–1537

    Abstract: Importance: Broad adoption of lung cancer screening may inadvertently lead to negative population health outcomes if it is perceived as a substitute for smoking cessation.: Objective: To understand views on smoking cessation from current smokers in ... ...

    Abstract Importance: Broad adoption of lung cancer screening may inadvertently lead to negative population health outcomes if it is perceived as a substitute for smoking cessation.
    Objective: To understand views on smoking cessation from current smokers in the context of being offered lung cancer screening as a routine service in primary care.
    Design, setting, and participants: As an ancillary study to the launch of a lung cancer screening program at 7 sites in the Veterans Health Administration, 45 in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews about health beliefs related to smoking and lung cancer screening were administered from May 29 to September 22, 2014, by telephone to 37 current smokers offered lung cancer screening by their primary care physician. Analysis was conducted from June 15, 2014, to March 29, 2015.
    Main outcomes and measures: Attitudes and perceptions about the importance of smoking cessation in the context of lung cancer screening.
    Results: Lung cancer screening prompted most current smokers to reflect for the first time on what smoking means for their current and future health. However, 17 of 35 (49%) participants described mechanisms whereby screening lowered their motivation for cessation, including the perception that undergoing an imaging test yields the same health benefits as smoking cessation. Other misperceptions include the belief that everyone who participates in screening will benefit; the belief that screening and being able to return for additional screening offers protection from lung cancer; the perception by some individuals that findings from screenings have saved their lives by catching their cancer early when indeterminate findings are identified that can be monitored rather than immediately treated; and a reinforced belief in some individuals that a cancer-free screening test result indicates that they are among the lucky ones who will avoid the harms of smoking.
    Conclusions and relevance: In this qualitative, lung cancer screening prompted many current smokers to reflect on their health and may serve as a potential opportunity to engage patients in discussions about smoking cessation. However, several concerning pathways were identified in which screening, when offered as part of routine care and described as having proven efficacy, may negatively influence smoking cessation. Health care professionals should be aware that the opportunity for early detection of lung cancer may be interpreted as a way of avoiding the harms of smoking. To promote cessation, discussions should focus on the emotional response to screening rather than clinical details (eg, nodule size) and address misperceptions about the value of early detection so that screening does not lower motivation to quit smoking.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms/psychology ; Male ; Mass Screening/psychology ; Middle Aged ; Smoking Cessation/psychology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2015-09
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 2699338-7
    ISSN 2168-6114 ; 2168-6106
    ISSN (online) 2168-6114
    ISSN 2168-6106
    DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3558
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top