LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease: a conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive disease.

Roofeh, David / Brown, Kevin K / Kazerooni, Ella A / Tashkin, Donald / Assassi, Shervin / Martinez, Fernando / Wells, Athol U / Raghu, Ganesh / Denton, Christopher P / Chung, Lorinda / Hoffmann-Vold, Anna-Maria / Distler, Oliver / Johannson, Kerri A / Allanore, Yannick / Matteson, Eric L / Kawano-Dourado, Leticia / Pauling, John D / Seibold, James R / Volkmann, Elizabeth R /
Walsh, Simon L F / Oddis, Chester V / White, Eric S / Barratt, Shaney L / Bernstein, Elana J / Domsic, Robyn T / Dellaripa, Paul F / Conway, Richard / Rosas, Ivan / Bhatt, Nitin / Hsu, Vivien / Ingegnoli, Francesca / Kahaleh, Bashar / Garcha, Puneet / Gupta, Nishant / Khanna, Surabhi / Korsten, Peter / Lin, Celia / Mathai, Stephen C / Strand, Vibeke / Doyle, Tracy J / Steen, Virginia / Zoz, Donald F / Ovalles-Bonilla, Juan / Rodriguez-Pinto, Ignasi / Shenoy, Padmanabha D / Lewandoski, Andrew / Belloli, Elizabeth / Lescoat, Alain / Nagaraja, Vivek / Ye, Wen / Huang, Suiyuan / Maher, Toby / Khanna, Dinesh

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)

2022  Volume 62, Issue 5, Page(s) 1877–1886

Abstract: Objectives: To establish a framework by which experts define disease subsets in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).: Methods: A conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive ILD was provided to 83 ... ...

Abstract Objectives: To establish a framework by which experts define disease subsets in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).
Methods: A conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive ILD was provided to 83 experts, asking them to use the framework and classify actual SSc-ILD patients. Each patient profile was designed to be classified by at least four experts in terms of severity and risk of progression at baseline; progression was based on 1-year follow-up data. A consensus was reached if ≥75% of experts agreed. Experts provided information on which items were important in determining classification.
Results: Forty-four experts (53%) completed the survey. Consensus was achieved on the dimensions of severity (75%, 60 of 80 profiles), risk of progression (71%, 57 of 80 profiles) and progressive ILD (60%, 24 of 40 profiles). For profiles achieving consensus, most were classified as clinical ILD (92%), low risk (54%) and stable (71%). Severity and disease progression overlapped in terms of framework items that were most influential in classifying patients (forced vital capacity, extent of lung involvement on high resolution chest CT [HRCT]); risk of progression was influenced primarily by disease duration.
Conclusions: Using our proposed conceptual framework, international experts were able to achieve a consensus on classifying SSc-ILD patients along the dimensions of disease severity, risk of progression and progression over time. Experts rely on similar items when classifying disease severity and progression: a combination of spirometry and gas exchange and quantitative HRCT.
MeSH term(s) Humans ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications ; Scleroderma, Systemic/complications ; Vital Capacity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods ; Severity of Illness Index ; Lung
Language English
Publishing date 2022-09-29
Publishing country England
Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
ZDB-ID 1464822-2
ISSN 1462-0332 ; 1462-0324
ISSN (online) 1462-0332
ISSN 1462-0324
DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/keac557
Shelf mark
Zs.B 240: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Zs.MO 497: Show issues
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top