LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Safety of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Early Removal: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

    Di Martino, Marcello / Miguel Mesa, Diana / Lopesino González, José María / de la Hoz Rodríguez, Ángela / Martín-Pérez, Elena

    Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques

    2020  Volume 30, Issue 5, Page(s) 410–415

    Abstract: Introduction: There are no strong recommendations regarding the management of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC). The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early PC removal in terms of complications and recurrent disease.: Materials and methods! ...

    Abstract Introduction: There are no strong recommendations regarding the management of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC). The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early PC removal in terms of complications and recurrent disease.
    Materials and methods: Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients who underwent PC for acute cholecystitis from January 2012 to December 2017. We first evaluated PC-related complications and recurrent disease in patients whose drainage was removed as inpatients (IPR) or as outpatients (OPR). Patients were then divided into 2 groups according to the timing of PC removal: G1 with the PC removed within the first 7 days after its collocation and G2 with the PC removed after 7 days.
    Results: We included 151 patients. Patients in the OPR group had their catheters removed after 52 days (26 to 67 d) while the IPR group after 8 days (6 to 11 d); P<0.001. No difference was seen regarding complications, recurrent disease rate, or readmissions.G1 was comprised of 56 patients (37.1%), whereas G2 had 95 (62.9%). When G1 was compared with G2, no differences were seen in terms of complications. However, G1 presented a shorter duration of antibiotic treatment with 11 days (8 to 14 d) versus 15 days (12 to 23 d) in G2; P<0.001, but had a higher rate of recurrent disease 32.1% versus 14.7% in G2; P=0.014 and a higher rate of readmission 30.3% versus 13.6% in G2; P=0.019.
    Conclusions: Removal of the PC during the index admission was not associated with a higher risk of complications. However, the PC removal before 7 days could be related to an increase in recurrent disease and readmissions.
    MeSH term(s) Cholecystitis, Acute/surgery ; Cholecystostomy ; Drainage ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-12
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Observational Study
    ZDB-ID 1475108-2
    ISSN 1534-4908 ; 1530-4515 ; 1051-7200
    ISSN (online) 1534-4908
    ISSN 1530-4515 ; 1051-7200
    DOI 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000799
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Patients' Perceived Satisfaction Through Telephone-Assisted Tele-Consultation During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Period: Observational Single-Centre Study at a Tertiary-Referral Colorectal Surgery Department.

    Blanco Terés, Lara / Cerdán Santacruz, Carlos / García Septiem, Javier / Maqueda González, Rocío / Lopesino González, José María / Correa Bonito, Alba / Martín-Pérez, Elena

    Surgical innovation

    2021  Volume 29, Issue 1, Page(s) 35–43

    Abstract: Introduction: ...

    Abstract Introduction:
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/epidemiology ; Colorectal Surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pandemics ; Patient Satisfaction ; Personal Satisfaction ; Remote Consultation ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Telemedicine ; Telephone
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-04-13
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Observational Study
    ZDB-ID 2182571-3
    ISSN 1553-3514 ; 1553-3506
    ISSN (online) 1553-3514
    ISSN 1553-3506
    DOI 10.1177/15533506211008053
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Proctologic emergency consultation during COVID-19: Comparative cross-sectional cohort study.

    Maqueda Gonzalez, Rocío / Cerdán Santacruz, Carlos / García Septiem, Javier / Blanco Terés, Lara / Lopesino González, Jose María / Fernández Jiménez, Guillermo / Martín-Pérez, Elena

    Cirugia espanola

    2021  Volume 99, Issue 9, Page(s) 660–665

    Abstract: Introduction: Proctologic issues entail a frequent reason for consultation in the emergency department (ED). We aim to analyze how the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has impacted in the demand for proctological consultations.: Material and method: Descriptive ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Proctologic issues entail a frequent reason for consultation in the emergency department (ED). We aim to analyze how the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has impacted in the demand for proctological consultations.
    Material and method: Descriptive comparative retrospective study of cross-sectional cohorts of patients attending the ED for proctological complaints from March to April in 2020 and 2019. Demographic variables, comorbidities, reasons for consultation and diagnosis, treatment and readmission were included. Four periods were analyzed according to the different stages of the pandemic derived limitations.
    Results: A total of 191 patients were reviewed, 58 in 2020 and 133 in 2019 with an average age of 48 years (SD 20.1) and 112 (58.6%) males. The average number of daily consultations was 2.18 patients in 2019 versus 0.95 in 2020 (p=0.025) meaning a 56% reduction in consultations for proctological reasons. This difference in average consultations was significant in both periods of lockout (p=0.001) and previous de-escalation (p=0.014). The diagnosis distribution was similar between both periods; however, perianal abscesses doubled their rate in 2020, 22.4% versus 11.3% (p=0.045). There was an increasing need for surgery, 31% vs 15% (p=0.011) with no difference in outpatients regimen after emergency surgery (12.5% vs 7.5%, p=0.201). Three patients in 2020 required readmission to the ED (5.2% vs 12.9%, p=0.086).
    Conclusion: There was a decrease of a 56% in proctologic emergency consultation, however, the need for surgery was twice more frequent during the study period. Reflection on the use of emergencies for proctological reasons is warranted.
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19 ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Referral and Consultation ; Retrospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-02-13
    Publishing country Spain
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2173-5077
    ISSN (online) 2173-5077
    DOI 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.10.003
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Proctologic emergency consultation during COVID-19: Comparative cross-sectional cohort study.

    Maqueda Gonzalez, Rocío / Cerdán Santacruz, Carlos / García Septiem, Javier / Blanco Terés, Lara / Lopesino González, Jose María / Fernández Jiménez, Guillermo / Martín-Pérez, Elena

    Cirugia espanola

    2020  

    Abstract: Introduction: Proctologic issues entail a frequent reason for consultation in the emergency department (ED). We aim to analyze how the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has impacted in the demand for proctological consultations.: Material and method: Descriptive ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Proctologic issues entail a frequent reason for consultation in the emergency department (ED). We aim to analyze how the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has impacted in the demand for proctological consultations.
    Material and method: Descriptive comparative retrospective study of cross-sectional cohorts of patients attending the ED for proctological complaints from March to April in 2020 and 2019. Demographic variables, comorbidities, reasons for consultation and diagnosis, treatment and readmission were included. Four periods were analyzed according to the different stages of the pandemic derived limitations.
    Results: A total of 191 patients were reviewed, 58 in 2020 and 133 in 2019 with an average age of 48 years (SD 20.1) and 112 (58.6%) males. The average number of daily consultations was 2.18 patients in 2019 versus 0.95 in 2020 (p=0.025) meaning a 56% reduction in consultations for proctological reasons. This difference in average consultations was significant in both periods of lockout (p=0.001) and previous de-escalation (p=0.014). The diagnosis distribution was similar between both periods; however, perianal abscesses doubled their rate in 2020, 22.4% versus 11.3% (p=0.045). There was an increasing need for surgery, 31% vs 15% (p=0.011) with no difference in outpatients regimen after emergency surgery (12.5% vs 7.5%, p=0.201). Three patients in 2020 required readmission to the ED (5.2% vs 12.9%, p=0.086).
    Conclusion: There was a decrease of a 56% in proctologic emergency consultation, however, the need for surgery was twice more frequent during the study period. Reflection on the use of emergencies for proctological reasons is warranted.
    Keywords covid19
    Language Spanish
    Publishing date 2020-10-23
    Publishing country Spain
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2173-5077
    ISSN (online) 2173-5077
    DOI 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.10.002
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Obstructive uropathy in a patient with double district ureter.

    Miguel Mesa, Diana / de la Hoz Rodríguez, Ángela / Lopesino González, Jose María / Muñoz de Nova, Jose Luis

    Cirugia espanola

    2017  Volume 96, Issue 6, Page(s) 376

    Title translation Uropatía obstructiva en paciente con doble sistema colector.
    MeSH term(s) Aged, 80 and over ; Humans ; Kidney Tubules, Collecting/abnormalities ; Kidney Tubules, Collecting/diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Ureter/abnormalities ; Ureter/diagnostic imaging ; Ureteral Obstruction/complications ; Ureteral Obstruction/diagnostic imaging ; Ureteral Obstruction/etiology
    Language Spanish
    Publishing date 2017-12-08
    Publishing country Spain
    Document type Case Reports ; Journal Article
    ISSN 2173-5077
    ISSN (online) 2173-5077
    DOI 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.11.002
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top