Article: Key Factors for Improving Rigor and Reproducibility: Guidelines, Peer Reviews, and Journal Technical Reviews.
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
2022 Volume 9, Page(s) 856102
Abstract: To respond to the NIH's policy for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical research, many journals have implemented guidelines and checklists to guide authors in improving the rigor and reproducibility of their research. Transparency in developing ... ...
Abstract | To respond to the NIH's policy for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical research, many journals have implemented guidelines and checklists to guide authors in improving the rigor and reproducibility of their research. Transparency in developing detailed prospective experimental designs and providing raw data are essential premises of rigor and reproducibility. Standard peer reviews and journal-specific technical and statistical reviews are critical factors for enhancing rigor and reproducibility. This brief review also shares some experience from |
---|---|
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2022-03-09 |
Publishing country | Switzerland |
Document type | Journal Article ; Review |
ZDB-ID | 2781496-8 |
ISSN | 2297-055X |
ISSN | 2297-055X |
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.856102 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.