LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Eligibility and Radiologic Assessment for Adjuvant Clinical Trials in Kidney Cancer.

    Agrawal, Sundeep / Haas, Naomi B / Bagheri, Mohammadhadi / Lane, Brian R / Coleman, Jonathan / Hammers, Hans / Bratslavsky, Gennady / Chauhan, Cynthia / Kim, Lauren / Krishnasamy, Venkatesh P / Marko, Jamie / Maher, Virginia Ellen / Ibrahim, Amna / Cross, Frank / Liu, Ke / Beaver, Julia A / Pazdur, Richard / Blumenthal, Gideon M / Singh, Harpreet /
    Plimack, Elizabeth R / Choueiri, Toni K / Uzzo, Robert / Apolo, Andrea B

    JAMA oncology

    2019  Volume 6, Issue 1, Page(s) 133–141

    Abstract: Purpose: To harmonize the eligibility criteria and radiologic disease assessment definitions in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).: Method: On November 28, 2017, US-based experts in RCC clinical trials, including ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: To harmonize the eligibility criteria and radiologic disease assessment definitions in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
    Method: On November 28, 2017, US-based experts in RCC clinical trials, including medical oncologists, urologic oncologists, regulators, biostatisticians, radiologists, and patient advocates, convened at a public workshop to discuss eligibility for trial entry and radiologic criteria for assessing disease recurrence in adjuvant trials in RCC. Multiple virtual meetings were conducted to address the issues identified at the workshop.
    Results: The key workshop conclusions for adjuvant RCC therapy clinical trials were as follows. First, patients with non-clear cell RCC could be routinely included, preferably in an independent cohort. Second, patients with T3-4, N+M0, and microscopic R1 RCC tumors may gain the greatest advantages from adjuvant therapy. Third, trials of agents not excreted by the kidney should not exclude patients with severe renal insufficiency. Fourth, therapy can begin 4 to 16 weeks after the surgical procedure. Fifth, patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy should be equally eligible. Sixth, patients with microscopically positive soft tissue or vascular margins without gross residual or radiologic disease may be included in trials. Seventh, all suspicious regional lymph nodes should be fully resected. Eighth, computed tomography should be performed within 4 weeks before trial enrollment; for patients with renal insufficiency who cannot undergo computed tomography with contrast, noncontrast chest computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis with gadolinium should be performed. Ninth, when feasible, biopsy should be undertaken to identify any malignant disease. Tenth, when biopsy is not feasible, a uniform approach should be used to evaluate indeterminate radiologic findings to identify what constitutes no evidence of disease at trial entry and what constitutes radiologic evidence of disease. Eleventh, a uniform approach for establishing the date of recurrence should be included in any trial design. Twelfth, patient perspectives on the use of placebo, conditions for unblinding, and research biopsies should be considered carefully during the conduct of an adjuvant trial.
    Conclusions and relevance: The discussions suggested that a uniform approach to eligibility criteria and radiologic disease assessment will lead to more consistently interpretable trial results in the adjuvant RCC therapy setting.
    MeSH term(s) Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Kidney Neoplasms/therapy ; Margins of Excision ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery ; Nephrectomy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-12-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
    ISSN 2374-2445
    ISSN (online) 2374-2445
    DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4117
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Eligibility and Radiologic Assessment in Adjuvant Clinical Trials in Bladder Cancer.

    Apolo, Andrea B / Milowsky, Matthew I / Kim, Lauren / Inman, Brant A / Kamat, Ashish M / Steinberg, Gary / Bagheri, Mohammadhadi / Krishnasamy, Venkatesh P / Marko, Jamie / Dinney, Colin P / Bangs, Rick / Sweis, Randy F / Maher, Virginia Ellen / Ibrahim, Amna / Liu, Ke / Werntz, Ryan / Cross, Frank / Beaver, Julia A / Singh, Harpreet /
    Pazdur, Richard / Blumenthal, Gideon M / Lerner, Seth P / Bajorin, Dean F / Rosenberg, Jonathan E / Agrawal, Sundeep

    JAMA oncology

    2019  Volume 5, Issue 12, Page(s) 1790–1798

    Abstract: Objective: To harmonize eligibility criteria and radiographic disease assessments in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).: Methods: National experts in bladder cancer clinical trial research, including ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To harmonize eligibility criteria and radiographic disease assessments in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
    Methods: National experts in bladder cancer clinical trial research, including medical and urologic oncologists, radiologists, biostatisticians, and patient advocates, convened at a public workshop on November 28, 2017, to discuss eligibility, radiographic entry criteria, and assessment of disease recurrence in adjuvant clinical trials in patients with MIBC.
    Results: The key workshop conclusions for adjuvant MIBC clinical trials included the following points: (1) patients with urothelial carcinoma with divergent histologic differentiation should be allowed to enroll; (2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy is defined as at least 3 cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy; (3) patients with muscle-invasive, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma should be included in adjuvant trials of MIBC; (4) patients with severe renal insufficiency can enroll into trials using agents that are not renally excreted; (5) patients with microscopic surgical margins can be included; (6) patients should undergo a standard bilateral lymph node dissection prior to enrollment; (7) computed tomographic (CT) imaging should be performed within 4 weeks prior to enrollment. For patients with renal insufficiency who cannot undergo CT imaging with contrast, noncontrast chest CT and magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis with gadolinium should be done; (8) biopsy of indeterminate lesions to evaluate for malignant disease should be done when feasible; (9) a uniform approach to evaluate indeterminate radiographic lesions when biopsy is not feasible should be included in any trial design; (10) a uniform approach to determining the date of recurrence is important in interpreting adjuvant trial results; and (11) new high-grade, upper-tract primary tumors and new MIBC tumors should be considered recurrence events.
    Conclusions and relevance: A uniform approach to eligibility criteria, definitions of no evidence of disease, and definitions of disease recurrence may lead to more consistent interpretations of adjuvant trial results in MIBC.
    MeSH term(s) Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy ; Cisplatin/therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials as Topic/standards ; Consensus Development Conferences as Topic ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Margins of Excision ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Patient Advocacy ; Patient Selection ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy
    Chemical Substances Cisplatin (Q20Q21Q62J)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-10-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2374-2445
    ISSN (online) 2374-2445
    DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4114
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval: crizotinib for treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer that is anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive.

    Malik, Shakun M / Maher, Virginia Ellen / Bijwaard, Karen E / Becker, Robert L / Zhang, Lijun / Tang, Shenghui W / Song, Pengfei / Liu, Qi / Marathe, Anshu / Gehrke, Brenda / Helms, Whitney / Hanner, Diane / Justice, Robert / Pazdur, Richard

    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research

    2014  Volume 20, Issue 8, Page(s) 2029–2034

    Abstract: On August 26, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved crizotinib (XALKORI Capsules, Pfizer Inc.) for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) ... ...

    Abstract On August 26, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved crizotinib (XALKORI Capsules, Pfizer Inc.) for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive as detected by an FDA-approved test. The Vysis ALK Break-Apart FISH Probe Kit (Abbott Molecular, Inc.) was approved concurrently. In two multicenter, single-arm trials, patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC previously treated with one or more systemic therapies received crizotinib orally at a dose of 250 mg twice daily. In 119 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC by local trial assay, the objective response rate (ORR) was 61% [95% confidence intervals (CI), 52%-70%] with a median response duration of 48 weeks. In 136 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC by the to-be-marketed test, the ORR was 50% (95% CI, 42%-59%) with a median response duration of 42 weeks. The most common adverse reactions (≥25%) were vision disorder, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, edema, and constipation. Accelerated approval was granted on the basis of the high ORRs and durable responses. On November 20, 2013, crizotinib received full approval based on an improvement in progression-free survival in patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC previously treated with one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen.
    MeSH term(s) Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/enzymology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics ; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic ; Diarrhea/chemically induced ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Approval ; Female ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Lung Neoplasms/enzymology ; Lung Neoplasms/genetics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Nausea/chemically induced ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Pyrazoles/administration & dosage ; Pyrazoles/adverse effects ; Pyrazoles/therapeutic use ; Pyridines/administration & dosage ; Pyridines/adverse effects ; Pyridines/therapeutic use ; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors ; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics ; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration ; Vision Disorders/chemically induced ; Vomiting/chemically induced
    Chemical Substances Protein Kinase Inhibitors ; Pyrazoles ; Pyridines ; crizotinib (53AH36668S) ; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases (EC 2.7.10.1) ; anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EC 2.7.10.1)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2014-04-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1225457-5
    ISSN 1557-3265 ; 1078-0432
    ISSN (online) 1557-3265
    ISSN 1078-0432
    DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3077
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top